Department of Gender Studies, Queen's University, Robert Sutherland Hall, Room 419 138 Union Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 2P1, Canada.
Department of Global Health, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 3;24(1):1174. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11489-9.
Indigenous Peoples living on the land known as Canada are comprised of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis people and because of the Government of Canada's mandatory evacuation policy, those living in rural and remote regions of Ontario are required to travel to urban, tertiary care centres to give birth. When evaluating the risk of travelling for birth, Indigenous Peoples understand, evaluate, and conceptualise health risks differently than Eurocentric biomedical models of health. Also, the global COVID-19 pandemic changed how people perceived risks to their health. Our research goal was to better understand how Indigenous parturients living in rural and remote communities conceptualised the risks associated with evacuation for birth before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
To achieve this goal, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 11 parturients who travelled for birth during the pandemic and with 5 family members of those who were evacuated for birth.
Participants conceptualised evacuation for birth as riskier during the COVID-19 pandemic and identified how the pandemic exacerbated existing risks of travelling for birth. In fact, Indigenous parturients noted the increased risk of contracting COVID-19 when travelling to urban centres for perinatal care, the impact of public health restrictions on increased isolation from family and community, the emotional impact of fear during the pandemic, and the decreased availability of quality healthcare.
Using Indigenous Feminist Methodology and Indigenous Feminist Theory, we critically analysed how mandatory evacuation for birth functions as a colonial tool and how conceptualizations of risk empowered Indigenous Peoples to make decisions that reduced risks to their health during the pandemic. With the results of this study, policy makers and governments can better understand how Indigenous Peoples conceptualise risks related to evacuation for birth before and during the pandemic, and prioritise further consultation with Indigenous Peoples to collaborate in the delivery of the health and care they need and desire.
生活在被称为加拿大的这片土地上的原住民由第一民族、因纽特人和梅蒂斯人组成。由于加拿大政府的强制疏散政策,安大略省农村和偏远地区的居民需要前往城市的三级保健中心分娩。在评估分娩旅行的风险时,原住民对健康风险的理解、评估和概念化方式与以欧洲为中心的生物医学健康模式不同。此外,全球 COVID-19 大流行改变了人们对健康风险的看法。我们的研究目标是更好地了解生活在农村和偏远社区的原住民产妇在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间如何概念化与疏散分娩相关的风险。
为了实现这一目标,我们对 11 名在大流行期间旅行分娩的产妇和 5 名被疏散分娩的产妇的家庭成员进行了半结构化访谈。
参与者认为在 COVID-19 大流行期间,疏散分娩的风险更大,并确定了大流行如何加剧了分娩旅行的现有风险。事实上,原住民产妇指出,在前往城市中心接受围产期护理时感染 COVID-19 的风险增加,公共卫生限制对与家人和社区隔离增加的影响,大流行期间的恐惧情绪的影响,以及医疗质量下降。
使用原住民女权主义方法论和原住民女权主义理论,我们批判性地分析了强制疏散分娩如何作为一种殖民工具运作,以及风险概念如何使原住民有权做出决策,以降低大流行期间对其健康的风险。通过这项研究的结果,政策制定者和政府可以更好地了解原住民在大流行之前和期间如何概念化与疏散分娩相关的风险,并优先与原住民进一步协商,以合作提供他们所需和期望的健康和护理。