The Novo Nordisk Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Søltofts Plads, Bygning 220, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Loschmidt Laboratories, Department of Experimental Biology and RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic; International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Pekarska 53, 656 91 Brno, Czech Republic.
Biotechnol Adv. 2024 Dec;77:108459. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2024.108459. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
Enzymes offer a more environmentally friendly and low-impact solution to conventional chemistry, but they often require additional engineering for their application in industrial settings, an endeavour that is challenging and laborious. To address this issue, the power of machine learning can be harnessed to produce predictive models that enable the in silico study and engineering of improved enzymatic properties. Such machine learning models, however, require the conversion of the complex biological information to a numerical input, also called protein representations. These inputs demand special attention to ensure the training of accurate and precise models, and, in this review, we therefore examine the critical step of encoding protein information to numeric representations for use in machine learning. We selected the most important approaches for encoding the three distinct biological protein representations - primary sequence, 3D structure, and dynamics - to explore their requirements for employment and inductive biases. Combined representations of proteins and substrates are also introduced as emergent tools in biocatalysis. We propose the division of fixed representations, a collection of rule-based encoding strategies, and learned representations extracted from the latent spaces of large neural networks. To select the most suitable protein representation, we propose two main factors to consider. The first one is the model setup, which is influenced by the size of the training dataset and the choice of architecture. The second factor is the model objectives such as consideration about the assayed property, the difference between wild-type models and mutant predictors, and requirements for explainability. This review is aimed at serving as a source of information and guidance for properly representing enzymes in future machine learning models for biocatalysis.
酶为传统化学提供了一种更环保、低影响的解决方案,但它们通常需要额外的工程设计才能在工业环境中应用,这是一项具有挑战性和繁琐的工作。为了解决这个问题,可以利用机器学习的力量来生成预测模型,从而实现对改进酶性质的计算机研究和工程设计。然而,这种机器学习模型需要将复杂的生物学信息转换为数值输入,也称为蛋白质表示。这些输入需要特别注意,以确保训练出准确和精确的模型,因此在本综述中,我们检查了将蛋白质信息编码为数值表示以供机器学习使用的关键步骤。我们选择了用于编码三种不同生物学蛋白质表示(一级序列、3D 结构和动力学)的最重要方法,以探索它们在使用和归纳偏差方面的要求。蛋白质和底物的组合表示也被引入作为生物催化中的新兴工具。我们提出了固定表示的划分、基于规则的编码策略集和从大型神经网络的潜在空间中提取的学习表示。为了选择最合适的蛋白质表示,我们提出了两个需要考虑的主要因素。第一个因素是模型设置,它受训练数据集大小和架构选择的影响。第二个因素是模型目标,例如考虑测定的性质、野生型模型和突变预测器之间的差异,以及可解释性的要求。本综述旨在为未来生物催化中的机器学习模型中正确表示酶提供信息和指导。