Tartari Ermira, Storr Julie, Bellare Nita, Kilpatrick Claire, McGuckin Maryanne, Schwaber Mitchell J, Pittet Didier, Allegranzi Benedetta
Infection Prevention and Control Technical and Clinical Hub, Department of Integrated Health Services, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Oct 4. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017162.
Creating and sustaining an institutional climate conducive to patient and health worker safety is a critical element of successful multimodal hand hygiene improvement strategies aimed at achieving best practices. Repeated WHO global surveys indicate that the institutional safety climate consistently ranks the lowest among various interventions.
To develop an international expert consensus on research agenda priorities related to the role of institutional safety climate within the context of a multimodal hand hygiene improvement strategy, we conducted a structured consensus process involving a purposive sample of international experts. A preliminary list of research priorities was formulated following evidence mapping, and subsequently refined through a modified Delphi consensus process involving two rounds. In round 1, survey respondents were asked to rate the importance of each research priority. In round 2, experts reviewed round 1 ratings to reach a consensus (defined as ≥70% agreement) on the final prioritised items to be included in the research agenda. The research priorities were then reviewed and finalised by members of the WHO Technical Advisory Group on Hand Hygiene Research in Healthcare.
Of the 57 invited participants, 50 completed Delphi round 1 (88%), and 48 completed round 2 (96%). Thirty-six research priority statements were included in round 1 across five thematic categories: (1) safety climate; (2) personal accountability for hand hygiene; (3) leadership; (4) patient participation and empowerment and (5) religion and traditions. In round 1, 75% of the items achieved consensus, with 9 statements carried forward to round 2, leading to a final set of 31 prioritised research statements.
This research agenda can be used by researchers, clinicians, policy-makers and funding bodies to address gaps in hand hygiene improvement within the context of an institutional safety climate, thereby enhancing patient and health worker safety globally.
营造并维持有利于患者及医护人员安全的机构氛围,是旨在实现最佳实践的多模式手卫生改善策略取得成功的关键要素。世界卫生组织(WHO)多次全球调查表明,在各项干预措施中,机构安全氛围的排名一直最低。
为就与多模式手卫生改善策略背景下机构安全氛围的作用相关的研究议程重点达成国际专家共识,我们开展了一个结构化的共识达成过程,涉及一组经过 purposive 抽样的国际专家。在进行证据映射后制定了一份研究重点初步清单,随后通过两轮的改良德尔菲共识达成过程对其进行完善。在第一轮中,要求调查受访者对每个研究重点的重要性进行评分。在第二轮中,专家们审查第一轮评分,以就纳入研究议程的最终优先项目达成共识(定义为≥70%的一致意见)。然后,WHO 医疗保健手卫生研究技术咨询小组的成员对研究重点进行了审查并最终确定。
在 57 名受邀参与者中,50 人完成了第一轮德尔菲调查(88%),48 人完成了第二轮(96%)。第一轮纳入了五个主题类别的 36 条研究重点陈述:(1)安全氛围;(2)手卫生的个人责任;(3)领导力;(4)患者参与和赋权;(5)宗教与传统。在第一轮中,75%的项目达成了共识,9 条陈述进入第二轮,最终形成了一组 31 条优先研究陈述。
研究人员、临床医生、政策制定者和资助机构可利用本研究议程,弥补机构安全氛围背景下手卫生改善方面的差距,从而在全球范围内提高患者及医护人员的安全。