• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国西南地区景观生态风险评估及驱动因素分析。

Landscape ecological risk assessment and driving factor analysis in southwest china.

机构信息

College of Agricultural, Guizhou University, 550025, Guiyang, People's Republic of China.

Institute of New Rural Development, Guizhou University, 550025, Guiyang, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 5;14(1):23208. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74506-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-74506-1
PMID:39369067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11455917/
Abstract

Landscape ecological risk assessment and ecological network construction are of great significance for optimizing territorial functions and reducing regional ecological risks. Based on the production-living-ecological space perspective, this study evaluated the spatiotemporal differentiation characteristics of landscape ecological risk and its driving mechanism in Southwest China and constructed a landscape ecological network. The results showed that the proportions of ecological space, production space and living space to the total space in 2020 were 74.35%, 24.55% and 1.10%, respectively. The industrial production space had the highest growth rate, increasing by 9.8 times from 2000 to 2020. During the study period, the average value of the ecological risk index ranged from 0.2 to 0.21 for the whole landscape. The geographical distribution of ecological risk zones showed significant differences, with risk zones showing a transition from high-risk and low-risk to medium-risk zones. A total of 105 ecological corridors and 156 ecological nodes have been constructed in the 2020 ecological network. The northeastern part of the study area needs better landscape connectivity and should be focused on ecological protection. Random Forest (RF) and Geodetector modeling showed that anthropogenic disturbance and land use levels have strong explanatory power for the evolution of ecological risk in the landscape. The interactions between anthropogenic disturbance, natural climate and regional economy are essential factors in the spatiotemporal differentiation of ecological risk. This study provides scientific references for ecological risk research and the promotion of high-quality development in Southwest China.

摘要

景观生态风险评估和生态网络建设对于优化国土功能和降低区域生态风险具有重要意义。本研究基于生产-生活-生态空间视角,评估了中国西南地区景观生态风险的时空分异特征及其驱动机制,并构建了景观生态网络。结果表明,2020 年生态空间、生产空间和生活空间分别占总空间的 74.35%、24.55%和 1.10%。工业生产空间增长最快,从 2000 年到 2020 年增长了 9.8 倍。研究期间,整个景观的生态风险指数平均值在 0.2 到 0.21 之间。生态风险区的地理分布差异显著,风险区从高风险和低风险向中风险区过渡。在 2020 年的生态网络中,共构建了 105 条生态廊道和 156 个生态节点。研究区东北部需要更好的景观连通性,应重点进行生态保护。随机森林(RF)和地理探测器模型表明,人为干扰和土地利用水平对景观生态风险的演变具有较强的解释能力。人为干扰、自然气候和区域经济之间的相互作用是生态风险时空分异的重要因素。本研究为生态风险研究和中国西南地区高质量发展提供了科学参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/cce96156cb8c/41598_2024_74506_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/da326a006ed1/41598_2024_74506_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/f8ef0ffa2653/41598_2024_74506_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/0905293d2772/41598_2024_74506_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/f687b590599f/41598_2024_74506_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/546a21469cc8/41598_2024_74506_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/b10ef0cf3a26/41598_2024_74506_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/f1a0f8b95bcd/41598_2024_74506_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/beaca92bfe46/41598_2024_74506_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/ceebe69adf46/41598_2024_74506_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/cce96156cb8c/41598_2024_74506_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/da326a006ed1/41598_2024_74506_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/f8ef0ffa2653/41598_2024_74506_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/0905293d2772/41598_2024_74506_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/f687b590599f/41598_2024_74506_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/546a21469cc8/41598_2024_74506_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/b10ef0cf3a26/41598_2024_74506_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/f1a0f8b95bcd/41598_2024_74506_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/beaca92bfe46/41598_2024_74506_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/ceebe69adf46/41598_2024_74506_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a87/11455917/cce96156cb8c/41598_2024_74506_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Landscape ecological risk assessment and driving factor analysis in southwest china.中国西南地区景观生态风险评估及驱动因素分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 5;14(1):23208. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74506-1.
2
[Landscape ecological risk assessment and influencing factors in ecological conservation area in Sichuan-Yunnan provinces, China.].[中国川滇生态保护区景观生态风险评估及影响因素]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 May;32(5):1603-1613. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202105.018.
3
Integrating ecosystem services and landscape connectivity to construct and optimize ecological security patterns: a case study in the central urban area Chongqing municipality, China.将生态系统服务和景观连通性相结合,构建和优化生态安全格局:以中国重庆市中心城区为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(28):43138-43154. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16281-4. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
4
Optimization of landscape pattern in the main river basin of Liao River in China based on ecological network.基于生态网络的中国辽河主要流域景观格局优化
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(24):65587-65601. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26963-w. Epub 2023 Apr 22.
5
Construction and Optimization Strategy of an Ecological Network in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study in Southwestern Hubei Province, China.山区生态网络构建与优化策略:以中国鄂西南为例
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 4;19(15):9582. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159582.
6
Construction of ecological security pattern of arid area based on landscape ecological risk assessment: a case study of the Wu-Chang-Shi urban agglomeration.基于景观生态风险评估的干旱区生态安全格局构建——以吴昌石城市群为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jul;31(33):45622-45635. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-34204-x. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
7
[Spatial and temporal variations of landscape ecological risk in the dry and hot valley of the Jinsha River during 2000-2020].2000—2020年金沙江干热河谷景观生态风险的时空变化
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2023 Oct;34(10):2767-2776. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202310.026.
8
The Construction of Ecological Security Patterns in Coastal Areas Based on Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment-A Case Study of Jiaodong Peninsula, China.基于景观生态风险评估的沿海地区生态安全格局构建——以中国胶东半岛为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 22;18(22):12249. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212249.
9
Construction of urban landscape ecological security pattern based on circuit theory: A case study of Hengyang City, Hunan Province, China.基于电路理论的城市景观生态安全格局构建——以湖南省衡阳市为例。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Jul;32(7):2555-2564. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202107.020.
10
A novel quantity assessment of landscape ecological risk using human-nature driving mechanism for sustainable society.利用人类-自然驱动机制进行景观生态风险的新型量化评估,以实现可持续社会。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Oct 15;947:173892. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173892. Epub 2024 Jun 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the environmental destruction in forest ecosystems using landscape metrics and spatial analysis.利用景观指标和空间分析评估森林生态系统中的环境破坏。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 13;13(1):15165. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42251-6.
2
Spatial-temporal distribution of global production-living-ecological space during the period 2000-2020.2000-2020 年全球生产-生活-生态空间的时空分布。
Sci Data. 2023 Sep 7;10(1):589. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02497-1.
3
Land use and land cover changes influence the land surface temperature and vegetation in Penang Island, Peninsular Malaysia.
土地利用和土地覆盖变化影响马来西亚半岛槟城岛的地表温度和植被。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 8;12(1):21250. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25560-0.
4
The role of land use change in affecting ecosystem services and the ecological security pattern of the Hexi Regions, Northwest China.土地利用变化在影响中国西北地区河西地区生态系统服务和生态安全格局中的作用。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jan 10;855:158940. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158940. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
5
Landscape ecological risk assessment and driving factor analysis in Dongjiang river watershed.东江流域景观生态风险评价及驱动因子分析。
Chemosphere. 2022 Nov;307(Pt 3):135835. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135835. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
6
Integrating potential ecosystem services losses into ecological risk assessment of land use changes: A case study on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.将潜在生态系统服务损失纳入土地利用变化生态风险评估:以青藏高原为例。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Sep 15;318:115607. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115607. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
7
Response of Ecosystem Health to Land Use Changes and Landscape Patterns in the Karst Mountainous Regions of Southwest China.中国西南喀斯特山区生态系统健康对土地利用变化和景观格局的响应
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 10;19(6):3273. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063273.
8
Urban ecological land and natural-anthropogenic environment interactively drive surface urban heat island: An urban agglomeration-level study in China.城市生态用地与自然-人为环境交互驱动城市地表热岛效应:基于中国城市群尺度的研究
Environ Int. 2021 Dec;157:106857. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106857. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
9
Study on landscape ecological risk assessment of Hooded Crane breeding and overwintering habitat.白头鹤繁殖与越冬栖息地景观生态风险评估研究。
Environ Res. 2020 Aug;187:109649. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109649. Epub 2020 May 19.
10
Spatial quantitative analysis of the potential driving factors of land surface temperature in different "Centers" of polycentric cities: A case study in Tianjin, China.多中心城市不同“中心”土地表面温度潜在驱动因素的空间定量分析:以中国天津为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Mar 1;706:135244. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135244. Epub 2019 Nov 29.