The Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences, Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing, China; State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of All Materials Flux in River Ecosystems, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China; Institute of Carbon Neutrality, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
The Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences, Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing, China; State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of All Materials Flux in River Ecosystems, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China; Institute of Carbon Neutrality, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Water Res. 2024 Dec 1;267:122568. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.122568. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
International food trade reshapes regional water scarcity through virtual water transfers (VWT), influencing water use equality and equity. This study examines eight populous yet impoverished countries in Africa and Asia, representing 30 % of the global poor population and contributing 20 % to agricultural VWT. Despite their significant role, these countries have been understudied due to a lack of data or attention. By integrating multiple datasets and models, we assess how international food trade impacts water scarcity, inequality, and inequity within these countries and identify the driving factors. Our findings reveal varied outcomes: Uganda and Ethiopia benefit from reduced water scarcity (∼40 % and ∼7 %) and improved equality and equity (∼90 % and ∼68 %), while India and Pakistan face exacerbated scarcity (∼4 % and ∼2 %) and widening inequality and inequity (∼4 % and ∼7 %). The effects are largely driven by critical trade flows of staple and cash crops like rice, sugar cane, and cotton among developing countries, propelled by comparative advantages in agricultural production, econo-geography, food demand, and water endowment between importers and exporters. Addressing these water challenges involves diversifying import channels to reduce reliance on detrimental trade flows, such as India's rice exports to Iran, while promoting beneficial flows, like Bangladesh's cotton imports from India, through trade agreements. Additionally, implementing pro-poor water policies (e.g., providing water subsidies) and water-saving techniques (e.g., adopting drip irrigation) is crucial, though caution is needed to avoid unintendedly marginalizing vulnerable groups through large-scale water projects.
国际食品贸易通过虚拟水转移(VWT)重塑区域水资源短缺,影响用水平等和公平。本研究考察了非洲和亚洲的 8 个人口众多但贫困的国家,这些国家占全球贫困人口的 30%,对农业 VWT 的贡献为 20%。尽管它们发挥了重要作用,但由于缺乏数据或关注,这些国家的研究较少。通过整合多个数据集和模型,我们评估了国际食品贸易如何影响这些国家的水资源短缺、不平等和不公平,并确定了驱动因素。我们的研究结果显示出不同的结果:乌干达和埃塞俄比亚受益于水资源短缺的减少(约 40%和 7%)以及平等和公平的改善(约 90%和 68%),而印度和巴基斯坦则面临着水资源短缺的加剧(约 4%和 2%)以及不平等和不公平的扩大(约 4%和 7%)。这些影响主要是由发展中国家之间的主食和经济作物(如水稻、甘蔗和棉花)的关键贸易流动驱动的,这些流动是由进口国和出口国之间的农业生产、经济地理、粮食需求和水资源禀赋的比较优势推动的。解决这些水挑战需要通过多样化进口渠道来减少对有害贸易流动的依赖,例如印度向伊朗出口大米,同时通过贸易协定促进有利的流动,如孟加拉国从印度进口棉花。此外,实施扶贫水政策(例如提供水补贴)和节水技术(例如采用滴灌)至关重要,但需要谨慎,避免通过大规模水项目无意中使弱势群体边缘化。