• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健领域人工智能中的公平性。

Fairness in AI for healthcare.

作者信息

Carey Siân, Pang Allan, Kamps Marc de

机构信息

UKRI CDT for AI in Medical Care and Diagnosis, University of Leeds, UK.

Leeds NHS Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Future Healthc J. 2024 Sep 19;11(3):100177. doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100177. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100177
PMID:39371535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11452831/
Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a technology that enables computers to simulate human intelligence and has the potential to improve healthcare in a multitude of ways. However, there are also possibilities that it may continue, or exacerbate, current disparities. We discuss the problem of bias in healthcare and AI, and go on to highlight some of the ongoing and future solutions that are being researched in the area.

摘要

人工智能(AI)是一种使计算机能够模拟人类智能的技术,有潜力在诸多方面改善医疗保健。然而,它也有可能延续或加剧当前的不平等现象。我们讨论了医疗保健和人工智能中的偏见问题,并继续强调该领域正在研究的一些当前和未来的解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af76/11452831/9f93ce09bfab/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af76/11452831/9f93ce09bfab/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af76/11452831/9f93ce09bfab/ga1.jpg

相似文献

1
Fairness in AI for healthcare.医疗保健领域人工智能中的公平性。
Future Healthc J. 2024 Sep 19;11(3):100177. doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100177. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations.人工智能在医疗保健中的公平性:综述与建议。
Jpn J Radiol. 2024 Jan;42(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01474-3. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
3
Addressing Fairness, Bias, and Appropriate Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Global Health.解决全球卫生领域中人工智能和机器学习的公平性、偏见及合理使用问题。
Front Artif Intell. 2021 Apr 15;3:561802. doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.561802. eCollection 2020.
4
Beyond bias and discrimination: redefining the AI ethics principle of fairness in healthcare machine-learning algorithms.超越偏见与歧视:重新定义医疗保健机器学习算法中公平性的人工智能伦理原则。
AI Soc. 2023;38(2):549-563. doi: 10.1007/s00146-022-01455-6. Epub 2022 May 21.
5
Call for algorithmic fairness to mitigate amplification of racial biases in artificial intelligence models used in orthodontics and craniofacial health.呼吁算法公平性以减轻在口腔正畸学和颅面健康中使用的人工智能模型中种族偏见的放大。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023 Dec;26 Suppl 1:124-130. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12721. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
6
A scoping review of fair machine learning techniques when using real-world data.使用真实世界数据时公平机器学习技术的范围综述。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Mar;151:104622. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104622. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
7
Multidisciplinary considerations of fairness in medical AI: A scoping review.医疗人工智能公平性的多学科思考:范围综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Oct;178:105175. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105175. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
8
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICAL PRACTICE: REGULATIVE ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVES.人工智能在医学实践中的应用:监管问题与展望。
Wiad Lek. 2020;73(12 cz 2):2722-2727.
9
"Shortcuts" Causing Bias in Radiology Artificial Intelligence: Causes, Evaluation, and Mitigation.“捷径”导致放射科人工智能产生偏见:原因、评估和缓解。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2023 Sep;20(9):842-851. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.06.025. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
10
Algorithmic fairness in artificial intelligence for medicine and healthcare.人工智能在医学和医疗保健中的算法公平性。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2023 Jun;7(6):719-742. doi: 10.1038/s41551-023-01056-8. Epub 2023 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
"How can we involve Patients?" - Students' perspectives on embedding PPIE into a doctoral training centre for AI in medical diagnosis and care.“我们如何让患者参与进来?”——学生对将患者与公众参与、介入和赋权(PPIE)融入医学诊断与护理人工智能博士培训中心的看法。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 7;11(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00750-y.
2
A new generation of patient-reported outcome measures with large language models.新一代基于大语言模型的患者报告结局测量方法。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Mar 24;9(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00867-4.
3
Bioethics Artificial Intelligence Advisory (BAIA): An Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI) Framework for Bioethical Clinical Decision Support.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying and reducing inequity in average treatment effect estimation.量化和减少平均处理效应估计中的不公平性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Dec 15;23(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02104-2.
2
Artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer histopathology: a systematic review.人工智能在卵巢癌组织病理学中的应用:一项系统综述
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2023 Aug 31;7(1):83. doi: 10.1038/s41698-023-00432-6.
3
Multidisciplinary considerations of fairness in medical AI: A scoping review.医疗人工智能公平性的多学科思考:范围综述。
生物伦理人工智能咨询(BAIA):用于生物伦理临床决策支持的智能人工智能(AI)框架。
Cureus. 2025 Mar 12;17(3):e80494. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80494. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Oct;178:105175. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105175. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
4
Effects of Cuff Size on the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Readings: The Cuff(SZ) Randomized Crossover Trial.袖带尺寸对血压测量准确性的影响:袖带(SZ)随机交叉试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Oct 1;183(10):1061-1068. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.3264.
5
Improving pulse oximetry accuracy in dark-skinned patients: technical aspects and current regulations.提高深色皮肤患者脉搏血氧仪测量精度:技术方面和现行法规。
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Oct;131(4):640-644. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.07.005. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
6
Ethnic minority representation in UK COVID-19 trials: systematic review and meta-analysis.英国 COVID-19 试验中的少数民族代表性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2023 Mar 29;21(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02809-7.
7
Sex, Racial, and Ethnic Representation in COVID-19 Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.COVID-19 临床试验中的性别、种族和民族代表性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Jan 1;183(1):50-60. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.5600.
8
Racial bias and reproducibility in pulse oximetry among medical and surgical inpatients in general care in the Veterans Health Administration 2013-19: multicenter, retrospective cohort study.种族偏见与退伍军人健康管理局普通内科住院患者中脉搏血氧饱和度测定的可重复性:2013-2019 年多中心回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2022 Jul 6;378:e069775. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069775.
9
Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records.借助电子健康记录实现可扩展且准确的深度学习。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 May 8;1:18. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0029-1. eCollection 2018.
10
The Artificial Intelligence Clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care.人工智能临床医生学习重症监护中脓毒症的最佳治疗策略。
Nat Med. 2018 Nov;24(11):1716-1720. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0213-5. Epub 2018 Oct 22.