Gaur Utkarsh, Gadkari Charuta, Pundkar Aditya
Emergency Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Orthopedics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 4;16(9):e68645. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68645. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Cardiac arrhythmias represent a major concern in the emergency department (ED), particularly given their association with significant morbidity and mortality. This narrative review examines the various factors influencing arrhythmias and their impact on patient outcomes in emergency settings. Managing complex supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) during acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and severe cardiovascular conditions remains challenging, despite advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Ventricular arrhythmias frequently forecast worse outcomes during hospital stays and heighten the chances of sudden cardiac death and cardiac arrest, especially within the initial 30 days after a heart attack. The incidence of arrhythmias in ED is increasing due to demographic changes and higher rates of chronic illnesses such as diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. These comorbidities, coupled with lifestyle factors such as smoking and alcohol consumption, complicate arrhythmia management, especially among older adults and males. Rapid and precise ECG interpretation in the ED is crucial for identifying specific arrhythmia types and initiating appropriate treatments. Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most prevalent form of rapid heart rhythm originating above the ventricles, notably impacts patient outcomes, particularly in cases of AMI and heart failure. In the ED, managing AF focuses on preventing strokes with thromboprophylaxis and employing risk assessment tools such as CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores. The analysis highlights how risk factors like hypertension, obesity, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and diabetes intricately influence the development and worsening of AF. Optimizing AF treatment outcomes requires a multidisciplinary approach involving cardiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care specialists. Future research should prioritize evaluating the effectiveness of preventive and therapeutic interventions for AF, integrating new risk factors and genetic insights to enhance prediction and management strategies. Understanding the factors contributing to arrhythmias and mortality in the ED underscores the importance of timely and accurate diagnostic and therapeutic measures to improve patient care and outcomes.
心律失常是急诊科的一个主要问题,特别是考虑到它们与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。这篇叙述性综述探讨了影响心律失常的各种因素及其在急诊环境中对患者预后的影响。尽管诊断和治疗技术有所进步,但在急性心肌梗死(AMI)和严重心血管疾病期间管理复杂的室上性和室性心律失常(VA)仍然具有挑战性。室性心律失常经常预示着住院期间的预后较差,并增加心脏性猝死和心脏骤停的几率,尤其是在心脏病发作后的最初30天内。由于人口结构变化以及糖尿病、高血压和慢性肾病等慢性病发病率的上升,急诊科心律失常的发病率正在增加。这些合并症,再加上吸烟和饮酒等生活方式因素,使心律失常的管理变得复杂,尤其是在老年人和男性中。在急诊科快速准确地解读心电图对于识别特定的心律失常类型和启动适当的治疗至关重要。心房颤动(AF)是起源于心室上方最常见的快速心律形式,对患者预后有显著影响,尤其是在AMI和心力衰竭病例中。在急诊科,管理AF的重点是通过血栓预防来预防中风,并使用CHA2DS2-VASc和HAS-BLED评分等风险评估工具。分析强调了高血压、肥胖、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)和糖尿病等风险因素如何复杂地影响AF的发生和恶化。优化AF治疗结果需要心脏病专家、急诊科医生和重症监护专家的多学科方法。未来的研究应优先评估AF预防和治疗干预措施的有效性,整合新的风险因素和基因见解,以加强预测和管理策略。了解急诊科心律失常和死亡率的影响因素强调了及时准确的诊断和治疗措施对于改善患者护理和预后的重要性。