Rajput Sandip, Raul Sneha, Dhopte Ashwini, Kavitha Chavadapu, Hegde Pauravi, Bhatt Sumit
Prosthodontics and Implantology, Guru Gobind Singh Dental College and Research Centre, Burhanpur, IND.
Prosthodontics, Guru Gobind Singh Dental College and Research Centre, Burhanpur, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 4;16(9):e68678. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68678. eCollection 2024 Sep.
This research aims to assess the impact of oxidation heat treatment (OHT) and dual opaquing techniques on enhancing the bond strength between metal and ceramic.
Eighty rectangular patterns with dimensions of 0.5x3x25 mm (according to ISO 9693-2012) were fabricated in a custom-made silicon mold by using auto-polymerized pattern resin material. These rectangular patterns were cast using base metal alloys. The samples were split into two primary groups: group A, subjected to OHT, and group B, without oxidation treatment. Each primary group was then split up into subgroups according to the application of single layers (group A1, B1) or double layers (group A2, B2) of opaque porcelain. After pre-surface treatment and Ceramco 3 paste opaque application, dentin porcelain (Ceramco 3) was applied to the mid-region of the samples, followed by firing to achieve a standardized thickness. Flexural strength determination was conducted via a three-point bend test performed on the universal testing machine (UTM) (Instron Corp., Model 2519-107, USA), adhering to ISO standard 9693. Post-testing failure types were analyzed by morphological assessment of debonding surfaces via a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 16, incorporating ANOVA for intergroup analysis and independent t-tests for intragroup comparisons.
Group A2 exhibited the highest mean flexural bond strength (P<0.05) at 41.85 MPa when compared to group A1 at 37.60 MPa, group B2 at 35.47 MPa, and group B1 with the least mean flexural bond strength at 30.41 MPa. SEM observations revealed cohesive bond failure for groups A1, A2, and B2 and adhesive bond failure for groups B1.
It is evident that OHT and opaquing technique are important factors in determining the bond strength of ceramo-metal restorations. When combined, these techniques greatly increase the overall success and durability of metal-ceramic restorations, underscoring their significance in contemporary dental prostheses.
本研究旨在评估氧化热处理(OHT)和双重遮色技术对增强金属与陶瓷之间结合强度的影响。
使用自凝模型树脂材料在定制的硅模具中制作80个尺寸为0.5×3×25mm(根据ISO 9693 - 2012)的矩形模型。这些矩形模型采用贱金属合金铸造。样本被分为两个主要组:A组,进行氧化热处理;B组,不进行氧化处理。然后根据单层(A1组、B1组)或双层(A2组、B2组)遮色瓷的应用将每个主要组再分为亚组。在进行预表面处理和应用Ceramco 3糊剂遮色后,将牙本质瓷(Ceramco 3)应用于样本的中部区域,随后进行烧制以达到标准化厚度。通过在万能试验机(UTM)(美国Instron公司,型号2519 - 107)上进行三点弯曲试验来测定弯曲强度,遵循ISO标准9693。测试后,通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对脱粘表面进行形态学评估来分析失效类型。使用SPSS 16版进行统计分析,组间分析采用方差分析,组内比较采用独立t检验。
与A1组(37.60MPa)、B2组(35.47MPa)和弯曲粘结强度均值最低的B1组(30.41MPa)相比,A2组的平均弯曲粘结强度最高(P<0.05),为41.85MPa。SEM观察显示,A1组、A2组和B2组为内聚粘结失效,B1组为粘结失效。
显然,氧化热处理和遮色技术是决定金属烤瓷修复体结合强度的重要因素。当这些技术结合使用时,可大大提高金属陶瓷修复体的整体成功率和耐久性,凸显了它们在当代牙科修复中的重要性。