Todorovski Izabela, Tsang Mary-Jane, Feran Breon, Fan Zheng, Gadipally Sreeja, Yoannidis David, Kong Isabella Y, Bjelosevic Stefan, Rivera Sarahi, Voulgaris Olivia, Zethoven Magnus, Hawkins Edwin D, Simpson Kaylene J, Arnau Gisela Mir, Papenfuss Anthony T, Johnstone Ricky W, Vervoort Stephin J
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
NAR Cancer. 2024 Oct 3;6(4):zcae039. doi: 10.1093/narcan/zcae039. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Therapeutic targeting of dysregulated transcription has emerged as a promising strategy for the treatment of cancers, such as leukaemias. The therapeutic response to small molecule inhibitors of Bromodomain-Containing Proteins (BRD), such as BRD2 and BRD4, P300/cAMP-response element binding protein (CBP) and Cyclin Dependent Kinases (CDKs), is generally attributed to the selective disruption of oncogenic gene expression driven by enhancers, super-enhancers (SEs) and lineage-specific transcription factors (TFs), including the oncogene. The selectivity of compounds targeting the transcriptional machinery may be further shaped by post-transcriptional processes. To quantitatively assess the contribution of post-transcriptional regulation in responses to transcription inhibition, we performed multi-omics analyses to accurately measure mRNA production and decay kinetics. We demonstrate that it is not only the selective disruption of mRNA production, but rather mRNA decay rates that largely influence the selectivity associated with transcriptional inhibition. Accordingly, genes down-regulated with transcriptional inhibitors are largely characterized by extremely rapid mRNA production and turnover. In line with this notion, stabilization of the transcript through swapping of its 3' untranslated region (UTR) rendered insensitive to transcriptional targeting. This failed to negate the impact on downstream targets and did not abrogate therapeutic responses. Finally, we provide evidence that modulating post-transcriptional pathways, such as through ELAVL1 targeting, can sensitize long-lived mRNAs to transcriptional inhibition and be considered as a combination therapy approach in leukaemia. Taken together, these data demonstrate that mRNA kinetics influence the therapeutic response to transcriptional perturbation and can be modulated for novel therapeutic outcomes using transcriptional agents in leukaemia.
针对转录失调进行治疗性靶向已成为治疗癌症(如白血病)的一种有前景的策略。对含溴结构域蛋白(BRD)的小分子抑制剂(如BRD2和BRD4)、p300/环磷酸腺苷反应元件结合蛋白(CBP)和细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶(CDK)的治疗反应,通常归因于由增强子、超级增强子(SE)和谱系特异性转录因子(TF)(包括癌基因)驱动的致癌基因表达的选择性破坏。靶向转录机制的化合物的选择性可能会受到转录后过程的进一步影响。为了定量评估转录后调控在转录抑制反应中的作用,我们进行了多组学分析,以准确测量mRNA的产生和衰减动力学。我们证明,不仅mRNA产生的选择性破坏,而且mRNA衰减率在很大程度上影响与转录抑制相关的选择性。因此,用转录抑制剂下调的基因在很大程度上具有极其快速的mRNA产生和周转的特征。与此概念一致,通过交换其3'非翻译区(UTR)使转录本稳定,使其对转录靶向不敏感。这未能消除对下游靶点的影响,也没有消除治疗反应。最后,我们提供证据表明,调节转录后途径,如通过靶向ELAVL1,可以使长寿命mRNA对转录抑制敏感,并可被视为白血病的一种联合治疗方法。综上所述,这些数据表明mRNA动力学影响对转录扰动的治疗反应,并且可以通过在白血病中使用转录药物来调节以获得新的治疗效果。