Suppr超能文献

评估补充剂治疗变应性鼻炎疗效的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of supplementation for allergic rhinitis treatment.

作者信息

He Yuxiao, Hu Xiaoyan, Chang Lanyin, Liu Shuang, Lv Liangge, Qin Gang, Jiang Liang

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Yanjiang District People's Hospital of Ziyang City, Ziyang, Sichuan, China.

Department of Pathogen Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 20;15:1417013. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1417013. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Demonstrating the positive effects of supplementation ( spp) on Allergic Rhinitis (AR) treatment is challenging. To investigate the role of spp in managing AR, a comprehensive review through systematic reviews and meta-analyses was conducted.

PURPOSE

To carry out a meta-analysis of clinical trials that used in treating AR based on current data.

STUDY DESIGN

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed.

METHODS

Various databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Science Direct, Springer Link and the Cochrane Library, were searched until October 2023 to obtain RCTs assessing impact of spp in the control of AR. The current meta-analysis was carried out with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

There were 8 studies enrolled, and our meta-analysis findings revealed that, relative to the control group, observation group exhibited the markedly increased total effective rate for allergic rhinitis treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 4.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] (2.57, 7.27), and < 0.00001); three studies showed that the effect of spp for nasal symptoms treatment among patients with allergic rhinitis was superior in observation group to control group [mean difference = -2.60, 95% CI (-2.82, -2.38), < 0.00001]; adverse effects occurred in five studies, all of which were transient, did not require medical intervention, and were not statistically significant between the two groups [OR = 1.01, 95% CI (0.59, 1.73), = 0.98].

CONCLUSION

The observation group demonstrated relative safety and had an enhanced effect on allergic rhinitis treatment and total nasal symptom improvement than the control group. The inclusion of fewer studies and the lower quality of trial design might affect the stability of the results. However, the evidence-based findings that spp for allergic rhinitis treatment is more accurate should be validated in future large-scale, multicenter, and well-designed RCTs.

摘要

背景

证明补充剂(spp)对变应性鼻炎(AR)治疗的积极作用具有挑战性。为了研究spp在管理AR中的作用,通过系统评价和荟萃分析进行了全面综述。

目的

基于当前数据对使用spp治疗AR的临床试验进行荟萃分析。

研究设计

对随机对照试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析。

方法

检索了包括PubMed、科学网、Embase、科学Direct、Springer Link和Cochrane图书馆在内的各种数据库,直至2023年10月,以获取评估spp对AR控制影响的RCT。当前的荟萃分析采用随机效应模型进行。

结果

纳入8项研究,我们的荟萃分析结果显示,相对于对照组,观察组变应性鼻炎治疗的总有效率显著提高(优势比[OR]=4.24,95%置信区间[CI](2.57,7.27),P<0.00001);三项研究表明,观察组中spp对变应性鼻炎患者鼻症状治疗的效果优于对照组[平均差=-2.60,95%CI(-2.82,-2.38),P<0.00001];五项研究中出现了不良反应,所有不良反应均为短暂性,无需医疗干预,两组之间无统计学意义[OR=1.01,95%CI(0.59,1.73),P=0.98]。

结论

观察组显示出相对安全性,并且与对照组相比,对变应性鼻炎治疗和总体鼻症状改善有增强作用。纳入的研究较少以及试验设计质量较低可能会影响结果的稳定性。然而,spp治疗变应性鼻炎更准确这一基于证据的发现应在未来大规模、多中心且设计良好的RCT中得到验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fca/11449843/afa54b755c9b/fphar-15-1417013-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验