• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较和评估旋转技术与手动技术在乳磨牙生物力学预备中的应用,以了解它们在清洁和成形效果方面的作用。

To Compare and Evaluate Rotary and Manual Techniques in Biomechanical Preparation of Primary Molars to Know Their Effects in Terms of Cleaning and Shaping Efficacy.

作者信息

Moudgalya M Srinivas, Tyagi Parimala, Tiwari Shilpi, Tiwari Tanu, Umarekar Poorva, Shrivastava Shubhrata

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, People's College of Dental Sciences & Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Department of Pedodontics, People's College of Dental Sciences & Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Aug;17(8):864-870. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2949.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2949
PMID:39372346
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11451875/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The introduction of the rotary file system for children was a revolution in the field of pediatric endodontics. These files are cost-effective and help in consistent obturations with shorter instrumentation time.

AIM

The present randomized controlled trial (RCT) was planned for a comparative evaluation of rotary and manual techniques in biomechanical preparation of primary molars to determine their effect in terms of cleaning and shaping efficacy, working time, quality of obturation, and postoperative pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized clinical trial study was conducted in 75 children aged 5-9 years requiring pulpectomy. Each tooth was randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups: Kedo-S files, rotary K-Flex files, and hand instruments group.

RESULTS

It was observed that Kedo-S files and rotary K-Flex files were more effective in cleaning and shaping of root canals compared to hand H/K files. The postbacterial count for hand files was higher compared to rotary files. Shorter working time was seen with rotary files (3.88-5.04 minutes) compared to hand files (15.68 minutes). Rotary files showed a reduced number of voids, with Kedo-S files in 92% of cases and rotary K-Flex files in 80% of cases. Apical seal and extent of fill were maximum with rotary files, having a grade C rating in 92% of cases. Kedo-S files and rotary K-Flex files showed a significant reduction in postoperative pain compared to hand files.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed a significant reduction in bacterial count, working time, quality of obturation, and postoperative pain with rotary files.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Moudgalya MS, Tyagi P, Tiwari S, To Compare and Evaluate Rotary and Manual Techniques in Biomechanical Preparation of Primary Molars to Know Their Effects in Terms of Cleaning and Shaping Efficacy. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(8):864-870.

摘要

背景

儿童旋转锉系统的引入是儿童牙髓病学领域的一次革命。这些锉具性价比高,有助于在更短的预备时间内实现一致的根管充填。

目的

本随机对照试验(RCT)旨在对乳牙生物力学预备中的旋转技术和手动技术进行比较评估,以确定它们在清洁和成形效果、工作时间、充填质量及术后疼痛方面的效果。

材料与方法

对75名年龄在5至9岁需要进行牙髓摘除术的儿童进行了一项随机临床试验研究。每颗牙齿被随机分配到三个治疗组之一:Kedo-S锉组、旋转K-Flex锉组和手动器械组。

结果

观察到,与手动H/K锉相比,Kedo-S锉和旋转K-Flex锉在根管清洁和成形方面更有效。与旋转锉相比,手动锉的细菌计数更高。与手动锉(15.68分钟)相比,旋转锉的工作时间更短(3.88 - 5.04分钟)。旋转锉的空隙数量减少,Kedo-S锉在92%的病例中如此,旋转K-Flex锉在80%的病例中如此。旋转锉的根尖封闭和充填程度最大,92%的病例评级为C级。与手动锉相比,Kedo-S锉和旋转K-Flex锉术后疼痛明显减轻。

结论

本研究表明,旋转锉在细菌计数、工作时间、充填质量和术后疼痛方面有显著降低。

如何引用本文

Moudgalya MS, Tyagi P, Tiwari S, 比较和评估乳牙生物力学预备中的旋转技术和手动技术以了解它们在清洁和成形效果方面的作用。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2024;17(8):864 - 870。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c72/11451875/4f4b3f96109d/ijcpd-17-864-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c72/11451875/4d915d0b5b7e/ijcpd-17-864-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c72/11451875/07d1365c8a59/ijcpd-17-864-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c72/11451875/4f4b3f96109d/ijcpd-17-864-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c72/11451875/4d915d0b5b7e/ijcpd-17-864-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c72/11451875/07d1365c8a59/ijcpd-17-864-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c72/11451875/4f4b3f96109d/ijcpd-17-864-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
To Compare and Evaluate Rotary and Manual Techniques in Biomechanical Preparation of Primary Molars to Know Their Effects in Terms of Cleaning and Shaping Efficacy.比较和评估旋转技术与手动技术在乳磨牙生物力学预备中的应用,以了解它们在清洁和成形效果方面的作用。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Aug;17(8):864-870. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2949.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Capacity and Efficiency of Kedo-S Pediatric Rotary Files, Rotary ProTaper, and Hand K Files in Primary Molar Pulpectomy.Kedo-S儿童旋转锉、旋转ProTaper锉和手动K锉在乳牙牙髓摘除术中的清洁能力和效率的比较评估
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 May-Jun;14(3):383-387. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1958.
3
Evaluation of the Efficiency to Remove the Infected Dentin Bacterial Count and to Adequately Shape the Canal Using Hand Kedo-SH Files, Rotary Kedo-SG (Blue) and Pro AF Baby Gold Files in Primary Molars: An Study.使用手动Kedo-SH锉、旋转Kedo-SG(蓝色)锉和Pro AF Baby Gold锉对乳牙感染牙本质细菌计数的清除效率及根管适当塑形的评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Sep;16(Suppl 2):142-148. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2652.
4
Clinical evaluation of instrumentation time and quality of obturation using paediatric hand and rotary file systems with conventional hand K-files for pulpectomy in primary mandibular molars: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.使用儿童手动和旋转锉系统与传统手动K锉进行下颌乳磨牙牙髓摘除术时的操作时间及根管充填质量的临床评估:一项双盲随机对照试验
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Dec;21(6):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s40368-020-00518-w. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
5
Assessment of Quality of Obturation, Instrumentation Time and Intensity of Pain with Pediatric Rotary File (Kedo-S) in Primary Anterior Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.使用儿童旋转锉(Kedo-S)对乳前牙根管充填质量、预备时间及疼痛强度的评估:一项随机对照临床试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018 Nov-Dec;11(6):462-467. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1558.
6
Comparison of quality of obturation and post-operative pain using manual vs rotary files in primary teeth - A randomised clinical trial.使用手动锉与旋转锉对乳牙进行根管充填的质量及术后疼痛比较——一项随机临床试验
Indian J Dent Res. 2019 Nov-Dec;30(6):904-908. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_37_18.
7
Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描对乳牙中手用K锉、ProTaper旋转锉和Kedo S旋转锉进行根管预备时的牙本质去除和锥度的比较评估。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Jul-Aug;13(4):332-336. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1787.
8
Postoperative Pain with Hand, Reciprocating, and Rotary Instrumentation Techniques after Root Canal Preparation in Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial.乳牙根管预备后使用手动、往复和旋转器械技术的术后疼痛:一项随机临床试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Jan-Feb;13(1):21-26. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1709.
9
Evaluation and Comparison of Effectiveness of Kedo-S Pediatric Rotary Files vs Manual Instrumentation for Root Canal Treatment in Primary Molars.Kedo-S儿童旋转锉与手动器械用于乳磨牙根管治疗的有效性评估与比较
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Jan-Feb;16(1):22-29. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2511.
10
Microbial Evaluation of Root Canals after Biomechanical Preparation with Manual K-files, Manual H-files, and Kedo-SG Blue Rotary Files: An Study.使用手动K锉、手动H锉和Kedo-SG Blue旋转锉进行根管生物力学预备后根管的微生物学评估:一项研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Nov-Dec;15(6):687-690. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2457.

引用本文的文献

1
Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Preparation With Different Instruments in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.乳牙使用不同器械进行根管预备后的术后疼痛:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Aug;11(4):e70180. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70180.
2
Comparing the use of pediatric files and conventional files in primary teeth: a systematic review.比较乳牙中儿童专用锉和传统锉的使用:一项系统评价。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1007/s40368-025-01084-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of instrumentation timing and cleaning efficacy in extracted primary molars using manual and NiTi rotary technique - Invitro study.使用手动和镍钛旋转技术对拔除的乳磨牙进行器械操作时机和清洁效果的比较评估——体外研究。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;9(2):151-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
2
Clinical Evaluation of Quality of Obturation and Instrumentation Time using Two Modified Rotary File Systems with Manual Instrumentation in Primary Teeth.使用两种改良旋转锉系统与手动器械对乳牙进行根管充填质量和器械操作时间的临床评估
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Sep;11(9):ZC55-ZC58. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/30069.10602. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
3
Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Preparation with Hand and Rotary Files in Primary Molar Teeth.
乳牙使用手动和旋转锉进行根管预备后的术后疼痛
Pediatr Dent. 2017 May 15;39(3):192-196.
4
Effects of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex instruments on crack formation in dentin.ProTaper通用型、ProTaper Next和HyFlex器械对牙本质中裂纹形成的影响。
J Endod. 2014 Sep;40(9):1482-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.026. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
5
Radiographic assessment and chair time of rotary instruments in the pulpectomy of primary second molar teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial.乳牙第二磨牙牙髓摘除术中旋转器械的影像学评估及椅旁操作时间:一项随机对照临床试验
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014 Spring;8(2):84-9. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2014.015. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
6
Prevalence of and factors affecting post-obturation pain following single visit root canal treatment in Indian population: A prospective, randomized clinical trial.印度人群单次就诊根管治疗后根管充填后疼痛的患病率及影响因素:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2012 Oct;3(4):459-63. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.107440.
7
Efficacy of reciprocating and rotary techniques for removing filling material during root canal retreatment.根管再治疗期间使用往复式和旋转式技术去除充填材料的疗效。
Int Endod J. 2013 Oct;46(10):947-53. doi: 10.1111/iej.12085. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
8
Comparison between rotary and manual techniques on duration of instrumentation and obturation times in primary teeth.乳牙根管预备和充填时间的旋转技术与手动技术比较。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 Summer;35(4):359-63. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.35.4.8k013k21t39245n8.
9
K-file vs ProFiles in cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in primary molar root canals: an in vitro study.K锉与Profile锉在乳磨牙根管清理能力及预备时间方面的比较:一项体外研究
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011 Jan-Mar;29(1):2-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.79907.
10
Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth.乳牙旋转器械与手动器械的比较。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008 Summer;32(4):295-8. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.32.4.l57l36355u606576.