• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新墨西哥州“不设行为健康共付额”法律的实施:一项定性研究。

Implementation Of New Mexico's 'No Behavioral Health Cost Sharing' Law: A Qualitative Study.

机构信息

Samantha J. Harris (

Ezra Golberstein, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Oct;43(10):1448-1454. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00101.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00101
PMID:39374463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11884875/
Abstract

Out-of-pocket spending is a long-standing challenge for privately insured people. New Mexico passed the first US law prohibiting private insurers from applying cost sharing to behavioral health treatment, effective January 1, 2022. We examined the perceptions of key informants, including clinicians, insurers, and state officials, about implementing the No Behavioral Health Cost Sharing law to explore how it might affect downstream outcomes such as spending and access. The law was viewed favorably and implemented without much difficulty. Clinicians noted widespread positive impacts, particularly for those needing intensive treatment. However, they worried about workforce capacity and the exclusion of people covered under self-insured employer plans, which are exempt from state regulation under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974. Insurers found the law to be in alignment with their organizational goals, but they expressed concern about the administrative burden caused by increased reviews of claims, and some were monitoring for unintended consequences (for example, waste and fraud) that could lead to increased premiums. Engagement strategies were needed to inform eligible members and facilitate enrollment in eligible plans. The law provides a potential model for states to improve access to behavioral health care, but impacts may be limited by factors such as workforce, awareness, and federal ERISA constraints.

摘要

自付费用一直是私人保险人群面临的挑战。新墨西哥州通过了美国第一部禁止私人保险公司将自付费用用于行为健康治疗的法律,该法律于 2022 年 1 月 1 日生效。我们研究了关键信息提供者(包括临床医生、保险公司和州官员)对实施《无行为健康自付费用法》的看法,以探讨其可能如何影响下游结果,如支出和获得。该法律受到了欢迎,并且在没有太多困难的情况下得到了实施。临床医生注意到了广泛的积极影响,特别是对那些需要强化治疗的人。然而,他们担心劳动力能力和自我保险雇主计划所涵盖的人的排斥,这些人根据 1974 年《雇员退休收入保障法案》(ERISA)豁免了州监管。保险公司认为该法律符合其组织目标,但他们对增加索赔审查所带来的行政负担表示担忧,一些人正在监测可能导致保费增加的意外后果(例如浪费和欺诈)。需要制定参与策略,通知符合条件的成员并促进其加入符合条件的计划。该法律为各州改善行为健康护理的获得提供了一个潜在的模式,但可能受到劳动力、意识和联邦 ERISA 限制等因素的限制。

相似文献

1
Implementation Of New Mexico's 'No Behavioral Health Cost Sharing' Law: A Qualitative Study.新墨西哥州“不设行为健康共付额”法律的实施:一项定性研究。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Oct;43(10):1448-1454. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00101.
2
Out-of-Pocket and Health Care Spending Changes for Patients Using Orally Administered Anticancer Therapy After Adoption of State Parity Laws.州平价法实施后口服抗癌治疗患者自付费用和医疗支出变化。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jun 14;4(6):e173598. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3598.
3
Shared responsibility payment for not maintaining minimum essential coverage. Final regulations.未维持最低基本医保覆盖范围的分担费用支付。最终规定。
Fed Regist. 2013 Aug 30;78(169):53646-64.
4
Five-year examination of utilization and drug cost outcomes associated with benefit design changes including reference pricing for proton pump inhibitors in a state employee health plan.对一项州雇员健康计划中与福利设计变更(包括质子泵抑制剂参考定价)相关的使用情况和药品成本结果进行的五年审查。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Apr;17(3):200-12. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.3.200.
5
Proposed regulations could limit access to affordable health coverage for workers' children and family members.拟议的法规可能会限制工人子女及家庭成员获得经济适用的医保。
Policy Brief UCLA Cent Health Policy Res. 2011 Dec:1-11.
6
Group health plans and health insurance issuers relating to coverage of preventive services under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Final rules.与《患者保护与平价医疗法案》下预防性服务覆盖范围相关的团体健康计划和健康保险发行人。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2012 Feb 15;77(31):8725-30.
7
Recent proposals to limit Medigap coverage and modify Medicare cost sharing.近期关于限制补充医疗保险覆盖范围及调整医疗保险费用分担的提议。
Issue Brief George Wash Univ Natl Health Policy Forum. 2012 Feb 24(845):1-19.
8
National trends in the cost of employer health insurance coverage, 2003-2013.2003 - 2013年雇主医疗保险覆盖成本的全国趋势。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2014 Dec;32:1-9.
9
Behavioral health services in separate CHIP programs on the eve of parity.单独的儿童健康保险计划中的行为健康服务在平价法案前夕。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 May;39(3):147-57. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0340-5.
10
Issues in mental health care benefits: the costs of mental health parity.心理健康护理福利问题:心理健康平权法案的成本
EBRI Issue Brief. 1997 Feb(182):1-14.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Implementation of Fertility Preservation Benefit Mandates.提高生育力保存福利规定的实施水平。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Sep 5;6(9):e253166. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3166.

本文引用的文献

1
How policymakers innovate around behavioral health: adoption of the New Mexico "No Behavioral Health Cost-Sharing" law.政策制定者如何围绕行为健康进行创新:新墨西哥州“无行为健康费用分担”法的采用。
Health Aff Sch. 2023 Dec 6;2(1):qxad081. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad081. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
3
Terminating Cost-Sharing Reduction Subsidy Payments: The Impact Of Marketplace Zero-Dollar Premium Plans On Enrollment.终止成本分担削减补贴支付:市场零保费计划对参保的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jan;39(1):41-49. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00345.
4
Association of Federal Mental Health Parity Legislation With Health Care Use and Spending Among High Utilizers of Services.联邦精神健康平权立法与服务高利用率者的医疗保健使用和支出的关联。
Med Care. 2019 Apr;57(4):245-255. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001076.
5
The Effects of Federal Parity on Mental Health Services Use and Spending: Evidence From the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.联邦平价法案对精神健康服务使用和支出的影响:来自医疗支出面板调查的证据。
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Apr 1;70(4):287-293. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800313. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
6
Federal Parity and Spending for Mental Illness.联邦精神疾病平等待遇与支出。
Pediatrics. 2018 Aug;142(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-2618.
7
The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act evaluation study: Impact on specialty behavioral health utilization and expenditures among "carve-out" enrollees.《精神健康平等与成瘾公平法案》评估研究:对“分拆”参保者专科行为健康服务利用及支出的影响
J Health Econ. 2016 Dec;50:131-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
8
The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act Evaluation Study: Impact on Specialty Behavioral Health Care Utilization and Spending Among Carve-In Enrollees.《精神健康平等与成瘾公平法案》评估研究:对纳入医保的参保者专科行为健康护理利用情况及支出的影响
Med Care. 2017 Feb;55(2):164-172. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000635.
9
Behavioral Health Services in the Changing Landscape of Private Health Plans.私人健康保险格局变化中的行为健康服务
Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Jun 1;67(6):622-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500235. Epub 2016 Feb 14.
10
Access and cost barriers to mental health care, by insurance status, 1999-2010.1999-2010 年,按保险状况划分的精神卫生保健的可及性和费用障碍。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Oct;32(10):1723-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0133.