Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Lancet Microbe. 2024 Nov;5(11):100926. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00168-X. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) has been shown to be efficacious for the prevention of bacterial sexually transmitted infections, but resistance implications for Neisseria gonorrhoeae remain unknown. We aimed to use a mathematical model to investigate the anticipated impact of doxycycline PEP on the burden of gonorrhoea and antimicrobial resistance dynamics in men who have sex with men (MSM) in the USA.
Using a deterministic compartmental model, characterising gonorrhoea transmission in a US MSM population comprising three sexual activity groups defined by annual partner turnover rates, we introduced doxycycline PEP at various uptake levels (10-90%) among those with high sexual activity. Infections were stratified by symptom status and resistance profile (ie, susceptible, ceftriaxone-resistant, tetracycline-resistant, or dual-resistant), with ceftriaxone the treatment for active infection. As resistance to tetracycline, not doxycycline, is monitored and reported nationally, we used this as a proxy for doxycycline PEP resistance. We compared the 20-year prevalence, incidence rates, and cumulative incidence of gonococcal infection, resistance dynamics (time to 5% prevalence of ceftriaxone resistance, 5% prevalence of dual resistance, and 84% prevalence of tetracycline resistance), and antibiotic consumption with baseline (ie, no doxycycline PEP).
Uptake of doxycycline PEP resulted in substantial reductions in the prevalence and incidence of gonorrhoea, but accelerated the spread of tetracycline resistance. The maximum reduction in prevalence over 20 years compared with no uptake ranged from 40·3% (IQR 15·3-83·4) with 10% doxycycline PEP uptake to 77·4% (68·4-84·9) with 90% uptake. Similarly, the maximum reduction in the incidence rate ranged from 38·6% (14·1-83·6) with 10% uptake to 77·6% (68·1-84·7) with 90% uptake. Cumulative gonococcal infections were reduced by a median of 14·5% (IQR 8·4-21·6) with 10% uptake and up to 46·2% (26·5-59·9) with 90% uptake after 5 years, and by 6·5% (3·4-13·0) with 10% uptake and 8·7% (4·3-36·2) with 90% uptake by 20 years. In almost all scenarios explored, doxycycline PEP lost clinical effectiveness (defined as 84% prevalence of tetracycline resistance) within the 20-year period, but its lifespan ranged from a median of 12·1 years (IQR 9·9-15·7) with 10% uptake to 1·6 years (1·3-1·9) with 90% uptake. Doxycycline PEP implementation had minimal impact on extending the clinical lifespan of ceftriaxone monotherapy (5·0 years [IQR 4·0-6·2]), with the median time to 5% prevalence of resistance ranging from 4·8 years (3·9-6·0) for 90% uptake to 5·0 years (4·1-6·2) for 10% uptake. Similarly, the median time to 5% prevalence of dual resistance to ceftriaxone and tetracycline ranged from 4·8 years (3·9-6·0) for 90% uptake to 5·8 years (4·8-7·4) for 10% uptake. Median decrease in ceftriaxone consumption for high doxycycline PEP uptake levels compared with baseline ranged from 41·7% (27·0-54·3) for 50% uptake to 50·2% (29·3-62·7) for 90% uptake at 5 years, but dropped to 11·8% (6·9-32·0) for 50% uptake and 12·1% (7·0-41·6) for 90% uptake after 20 years.
Notwithstanding the clear benefits of doxycycline PEP for other sexually transmitted infections, for N gonorrhoeae, model findings suggest that doxycycline PEP is an effective but impermanent solution for reducing infection burden, given eventual selection for resistant strains. This finding presents a challenge for policy makers considering strategies for doxycycline PEP implementation and oversight: the need to balance the clear, short-term clinical benefits with the risk of harm via antimicrobial resistance.
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
多西环素暴露后预防(PEP)已被证明可有效预防细菌性性传播感染,但淋病奈瑟菌的耐药性影响尚不清楚。我们旨在使用数学模型来研究多西环素 PEP 对美国男男性行为者(MSM)中淋病负担和抗菌药物耐药性动态的预期影响。
我们使用了一个确定性的房室模型,该模型描述了由年度性伴侣更替率定义的三个性活动组的美国 MSM 人群中的淋病传播。在性活动较高的人群中,我们以 10-90%的不同水平引入了多西环素 PEP。感染根据症状状态和耐药谱(即敏感、头孢曲松耐药、四环素耐药或双重耐药)分层,头孢曲松是治疗活动性感染的药物。由于对四环素的耐药性,而不是多西环素,被监测和报告,因此我们将其用作多西环素 PEP 耐药性的替代品。我们比较了基线(即没有多西环素 PEP)情况下 20 年内淋病感染的流行率、发病率和累积发病率、耐药性动态(头孢曲松耐药率达到 5%的时间、双重耐药率达到 5%的时间和 84%的四环素耐药率)以及抗生素的使用情况。
多西环素 PEP 的使用导致淋病的流行率和发病率显著降低,但加速了四环素耐药性的传播。与没有使用多西环素 PEP 相比,在 20 年内,最大的流行率降低幅度从 10%的 PEP 使用率的 40.3%(15.3-83.4)到 90%的 PEP 使用率的 77.4%(68.4-84.9)。同样,发病率最大降低幅度从 10%的 PEP 使用率的 38.6%(14.1-83.6)到 90%的 PEP 使用率的 77.6%(68.1-84.7)。在 5 年内,多西环素 PEP 的中位累积淋病感染减少了 14.5%(8.4-21.6),最高可减少 46.2%(26.5-59.9),而在 20 年内,多西环素 PEP 的中位累积淋病感染减少了 6.5%(3.4-13.0),最高可减少 8.7%(4.3-36.2)。在几乎所有探索的情况下,多西环素 PEP 在 20 年内失去了临床有效性(定义为四环素耐药率达到 84%),但其寿命范围从 10%的 PEP 使用率的中位 12.1 年(9.9-15.7)到 90%的 PEP 使用率的 1.6 年(1.3-1.9)。多西环素 PEP 的实施对延长头孢曲松单药治疗的临床寿命几乎没有影响(5.0 年[4.0-6.2]),耐药率达到 5%的中位时间范围从 90%的 PEP 使用率的 4.8 年(3.9-6.0)到 10%的 PEP 使用率的 5.0 年(4.1-6.2)。同样,头孢曲松和四环素双重耐药率达到 5%的中位时间范围从 90%的 PEP 使用率的 4.8 年(3.9-6.0)到 10%的 PEP 使用率的 5.8 年(4.8-7.4)。与基线相比,高剂量多西环素 PEP 使用率下头孢曲松的中位消耗量减少了 41.7%(27.0-54.3),最高可达 50%的 PEP 使用率的 50.2%(29.3-62.7),但在 20 年内降至 50%的 PEP 使用率的 11.8%(6.9-32.0)和 90%的 PEP 使用率的 12.1%(7.0-41.6)。
尽管多西环素 PEP 对其他性传播感染具有明显的益处,但对于淋病奈瑟菌,模型结果表明,多西环素 PEP 是减少感染负担的有效但暂时的解决方案,因为最终会选择耐药菌株。这一发现为考虑多西环素 PEP 实施和监督策略的政策制定者提出了挑战:需要平衡明确的短期临床益处与通过抗微生物药物耐药性造成的危害风险。
美国疾病控制与预防中心,美国国家过敏和传染病研究所。