Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Oct;33(10):e70026. doi: 10.1002/pds.70026.
Pharmacoepidemiological studies provide important information on the safety and effectiveness of medications, but the validity of study findings can be threatened by residual bias. Ideally, biases would be minimized through appropriate study design and statistical analysis methods. However, residual biases can remain, for example, due to unmeasured confounders, measurement error, or selection into the study. A group of sensitivity analysis methods, termed quantitative bias analyses, are available to assess, quantitatively and transparently, the robustness of study results to these residual biases. These approaches include methods to quantify how the estimated effect would be altered under specified assumptions about the potential bias, and methods to calculate bounds on effect estimates. This article introduces quantitative bias analyses for unmeasured confounding, misclassification, and selection bias, with a focus on their relevance and application to pharmacoepidemiological studies.
药物流行病学研究为药物的安全性和有效性提供了重要信息,但研究结果的有效性可能会受到残留偏倚的威胁。理想情况下,可以通过适当的研究设计和统计分析方法来最小化偏差。然而,由于未测量的混杂因素、测量误差或选择进入研究等原因,残留偏倚仍然存在。一组敏感性分析方法,称为定量偏倚分析,可用于评估研究结果对这些残留偏倚的稳健性,定量且透明。这些方法包括量化在特定潜在偏倚假设下估计效果会如何改变的方法,以及计算效果估计值界限的方法。本文介绍了针对未测量混杂、分类错误和选择偏倚的定量偏倚分析,重点介绍了它们与药物流行病学研究的相关性和应用。