Piovesana Marco, Boscolo Nata Francesca, Gardenal Nicoletta, Tofanelli Margherita, Boscolo-Rizzo Paolo, Bussani Rossana, Tirelli Giancarlo
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, ULSS 4 Veneto Orientale, Via Piemonte 1, Portogruaro, VE 30026 Italy.
Head and Neck Department, ENT Clinic, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume 447, Trieste, Italy.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Oct;76(5):5001-5007. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04943-x. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
In the 2nd century AD, Galen argued that the failure to remove any single 'root' of a malignant tumor could result in a local relapse. After nearly 2 millennia, this problem appears to be even more challenging due to our increased understanding of the complexity of tumor formation and spread. Pathological analysis of tumor margins under a microscope remains the primary and only accepted method for confirming the complete tumor removal. However, this method is not an all-or-nothing test, and it can be compromised by various intrinsic and extrinsic limitations. Among the intrinsic limitations of pathological analysis we recall the pathologist handling, tissue shrinkage, the detection of minimal residual disease and the persistence of a precancerous field. Extrinsic limitations relate to surgical tools and their thermal damage, the different kinds of surgical resections and frozen sections collection. Surgeons, as well as oncologists and radiotherapists, should be well aware of and deeply understand these limitations to avoid misinterpretation of margin status, which can have serious consequences. Meanwhile, new technologies such as Narrow band imaging have shown promising results in assisting with the achievement of clear superficial resection margins. More recently, emerging techniques like Raman spectroscopy and near-infrared fluorescence have shown potential as real-time guides for surgical resection. The aim of this narrative review is to provide valuable insights into the complex process of margin analysis and underscore the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration between pathologists, surgeons, oncologists, and radiotherapists to optimize patient outcomes in oral cancer surgery.
公元2世纪,盖伦认为未能切除恶性肿瘤的任何一个“根源”都可能导致局部复发。经过近两千年,由于我们对肿瘤形成和扩散的复杂性有了更多了解,这个问题似乎变得更具挑战性。在显微镜下对肿瘤边缘进行病理分析仍然是确认肿瘤完全切除的主要且唯一被认可的方法。然而,这种方法并非是一个非黑即白的测试,它可能会受到各种内在和外在限制的影响。在病理分析的内在限制中,我们提到病理学家的操作、组织收缩、微小残留疾病的检测以及癌前病变区域的持续存在。外在限制则涉及手术工具及其热损伤、不同类型的手术切除和冰冻切片采集。外科医生以及肿瘤学家和放射肿瘤学家都应该充分了解并深刻理解这些限制,以避免对切缘状态的错误解读,这可能会产生严重后果。与此同时,诸如窄带成像等新技术在协助实现清晰的浅表切除切缘方面已显示出有前景的结果。最近,拉曼光谱和近红外荧光等新兴技术已显示出作为手术切除实时指导的潜力。本叙述性综述的目的是为切缘分析的复杂过程提供有价值的见解,并强调病理学家、外科医生、肿瘤学家和放射肿瘤学家之间跨学科合作对于优化口腔癌手术患者预后的重要性。