Elghobashy Ahmed, Scribante Juan, Perrie Helen, Nel Dorinka
Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
S Afr J Infect Dis. 2022 May 30;37(1):351. doi: 10.4102/sajid.v37i1.351. eCollection 2022.
Anaesthetists need to be knowledgeable regarding the control of airborne infection to ensure safe practice. The aim of this study was to determine anaesthetists' knowledge regarding airborne infections in the perioperative period in the Department of Anaesthesiology at the University of the Witwatersrand.
A cross-sectional research design was followed using an anonymous self-administered questionnaire. Data were collected at academic departmental meetings by convenience sampling. Returning the questionnaire implied consent. A score of 65% was considered adequate knowledge.
Of the 150 questionnaires distributed, 137 (91.3%) questionnaires were returned. An overall mean (standard deviation [s.d.]) score of 58.8% (4.252) was achieved, and only 11 (8.1%) of anaesthetists had adequate knowledge. There was no statistically significant association between seniority and passing or failing ( = 0.327). The highest mean (s.d.) score, 67.4% (6.979), was reported in the section pertaining to patients, followed by the section regarding operating theatre staff at 58.1% (11.899) and the lowest mark, 53.5% (5.553), for the environment section. Anaesthetists scored significantly better in the knowledge regarding patients' section than in other sections ( < 0.0005).
Knowledge of airborne infections in this study was poor, with only 8.1% achieving a pass, and no difference in knowledge between junior and senior anaesthetists was observed. Considering the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic at the time of the study, this was a surprising finding. Urgent action needs to be taken to ensure the safety of anaesthetists, other operating theatre staff and patients.
麻醉医生需要了解空气传播感染的控制方法,以确保安全操作。本研究的目的是确定威特沃特斯兰德大学麻醉学系麻醉医生对围手术期空气传播感染的了解情况。
采用匿名自填式问卷进行横断面研究设计。通过便利抽样在学术部门会议上收集数据。返回问卷即表示同意。65%的分数被认为是足够的知识水平。
在分发的150份问卷中,有137份(91.3%)被收回。总体平均(标准差[s.d.])得分为58.8%(4.252),只有11名(8.1%)麻醉医生有足够的知识。资历与及格或不及格之间没有统计学上的显著关联(P = 0.327)。在与患者相关的部分,平均(标准差)得分最高,为67.4%(6.979),其次是与手术室工作人员相关的部分,为58.1%(11.899),环境部分得分最低,为53.5%(5.553)。麻醉医生在患者相关部分的知识得分明显高于其他部分(P < 0.0005)。
本研究中对空气传播感染的了解情况较差,只有8.1%的人及格,未观察到初级和高级麻醉医生在知识方面的差异。考虑到研究时正在发生的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行,这是一个令人惊讶的发现。需要立即采取行动,以确保麻醉医生、其他手术室工作人员和患者的安全。