Suppr超能文献

基层医疗中用于管理急性呼吸道感染的即时检验:对医疗专业人员和患者观点的系统评价与定性综合分析

Point-of-care tests to manage acute respiratory tract infections in primary care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of healthcare professional and patient views.

作者信息

Hoste Melanie E, Borek Aleksandra J, Santillo Marta, Roberts Nia, Tonkin-Crine Sarah, Anthierens Sibyl

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 Jan 3;80(1):29-46. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae349.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence on healthcare professionals' (HCPs) and patients' views of the use of point-of-care tests (POCTs) in the management of acute respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in primary care settings.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of studies up to 28 April 2023. We included studies that included qualitative methods and results; focused on HCPs' and/or patients' views/experiences of POCTs for acute RTIs; and were conducted in primary care settings. We conducted a thematic synthesis to identify how their views on POCTs and interventions can support test use (PROSPERO registration: CRD42019150347).

RESULTS

We included 33 studies, developing 9 categories each for HCP and patient data. We identified 38 factors affecting POCT use: 28 from HCPs and 10 from patients. Factors exist outside and within consultations, and post-consultations, illustrating that some cannot be addressed by HCPs alone. Fourteen interventions were identified that could address factors and support POCT use, with 7 interventions appearing to address the most factors. Some interventions were beyond the scope of HCPs and patients and needed to be addressed at system and organizational levels. Both groups had mixed views on the use of POCTs and highlighted implementation challenges.

DISCUSSION

This review highlights numerous factors affecting POCT use in primary care. Policy-makers planning to implement POCTs are likely to achieve more by providing multi-faceted interventions that target factors outside, within, and post-consultation. Some interventions may need to be already established before POCT introduction. Whilst evidence beyond general practice is limited, similar factors suggest that similar context-tailored interventions would be appropriate.

摘要

目的

回顾关于医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)和患者对在基层医疗环境中使用即时检验(POCTs)管理急性呼吸道感染(RTIs)的观点的证据。

方法

我们对截至2023年4月28日的研究进行了系统综述。我们纳入了包括定性方法和结果的研究;关注HCPs和/或患者对用于急性RTIs的POCTs的观点/经验;并在基层医疗环境中进行。我们进行了主题综合分析,以确定他们对POCTs和干预措施的观点如何支持检验的使用(PROSPERO注册编号:CRD42019150347)。

结果

我们纳入了33项研究,分别为HCP和患者数据形成了9个类别。我们确定了38个影响POCT使用的因素:28个来自HCPs,10个来自患者。这些因素存在于会诊之外、会诊期间和会诊之后,表明有些因素不能仅由HCPs解决。确定了14项可以解决这些因素并支持POCT使用的干预措施,其中7项干预措施似乎解决了最多的因素。一些干预措施超出了HCPs和患者的范围,需要在系统和组织层面解决。两组对POCT的使用都有不同的看法,并强调了实施方面的挑战。

讨论

本综述强调了影响基层医疗中POCT使用的众多因素。计划实施POCT的政策制定者通过提供针对会诊之外、会诊期间和会诊之后因素的多方面干预措施可能会取得更多成效。一些干预措施可能需要在引入POCT之前就已确立。虽然全科医疗之外的证据有限,但类似的因素表明类似的因地制宜的干预措施是合适的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验