Suppr超能文献

动机与决策的神经与计算机制。

Neural and Computational Mechanisms of Motivation and Decision-making.

机构信息

Brown University.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Dec 1;36(12):2822-2830. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02258.

Abstract

Motivation is often thought to enhance adaptive decision-making by biasing actions toward rewards and away from punishment. Emerging evidence, however, points to a more nuanced view whereby motivation can both enhance and impair different aspects of decision-making. Model-based approaches have gained prominence over the past decade for developing more precise mechanistic explanations for how incentives impact goal-directed behavior. In this Special Focus, we highlight three studies that demonstrate how computational frameworks help decompose decision processes into constituent cognitive components, as well as formalize when and how motivational factors (e.g., monetary rewards) influence specific cognitive processes, decision-making strategies, and self-report measures. Finally, I conclude with a provocative suggestion based on recent advances in the field: that organisms do not merely seek to maximize the expected value of extrinsic incentives. Instead, they may be optimizing decision-making to achieve a desired internal state (e.g., homeostasis, effort, affect). Future investigation into such internal processes will be a fruitful endeavor for unlocking the cognitive, computational, and neural mechanisms of motivated decision-making.

摘要

动机通常被认为通过使行为偏向于奖励而远离惩罚来增强适应性决策。然而,新出现的证据表明,动机可以增强和损害决策的不同方面,这是一种更为微妙的观点。在过去的十年中,基于模型的方法因其能够为激励如何影响目标导向行为提供更精确的机械解释而受到关注。在本期特刊中,我们强调了三项研究,这些研究表明计算框架如何将决策过程分解为组成认知成分,以及形式化激励因素(例如,金钱奖励)何时以及如何影响特定认知过程、决策策略和自我报告措施。最后,我根据该领域的最新进展提出了一个有争议的建议:生物体不仅仅是为了最大化外在激励的预期价值而寻求。相反,它们可能会优化决策以达到期望的内部状态(例如,体内平衡、努力、情感)。未来对这些内部过程的研究将是揭示动机决策的认知、计算和神经机制的富有成效的努力。

相似文献

3
Age-Related Differences in Motivational Integration and Cognitive Control.年龄相关的动机整合和认知控制差异。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Jun;19(3):692-714. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00713-3.
10
Effort-based decision making varies by smoking status.基于努力的决策因吸烟状况而异。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Apr;237(4):1081-1090. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05437-3. Epub 2020 Jan 3.

本文引用的文献

9
The Human Affectome.人类情感组
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024 Mar;158:105450. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105450. Epub 2023 Nov 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验