• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠病毒与非新冠病毒感染后嗅觉功能障碍的比较分析。

Comparative analyses of post-infectious olfactory dysfunction between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.

The Airway Mucus Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 9;14(1):23511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74629-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-74629-5
PMID:39379543
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11461854/
Abstract

To identify the differences between COVID-19-associated and non-COVID-19-associated olfactory dysfunction (OD), we analyzed demographic and clinical characteristics based on the causative virus (COVID versus non-COVID groups) in patients with post-infectious olfactory dysfunction (PIOD) who underwent the olfactory questionnaire and olfactory function test. Out of 169 patients with PIOD, 99 were diagnosed with COVID-19 (COVID group), while 70 were not (non-COVID group). The COVID group was younger and had a higher percentage of male patients as well as patients with parosmia than the non-COVID group. In the initial olfactory function tests, the TDI, discrimination and identification scores were significantly higher in the COVID group than in the non-COVID group. TDI scores were significantly increased in patients with PIOD after treatment, regardless of the group. The threshold score was significantly increased by 1.38 in the COVID group while the identification score was significantly increased by 2.67 in the non-COVID group. Patients with COVID-19-associated OD were younger in age, tended to be male, had a higher incidence of parosmia, and had better initial olfactory function test results compared to those with non-COVID-19-associated OD. Following treatment, odor detection threshold improved in the COVID group, whereas odor identification improved in the non-COVID group.

摘要

为了识别 COVID-19 相关和非 COVID-19 相关嗅觉功能障碍(OD)之间的差异,我们根据导致病毒(COVID 与非 COVID 组)分析了感染后嗅觉功能障碍(PIOD)患者的人口统计学和临床特征,这些患者接受了嗅觉问卷和嗅觉功能测试。在 169 名 PIOD 患者中,99 名被诊断为 COVID-19(COVID 组),而 70 名未被诊断为 COVID-19(非 COVID 组)。COVID 组的年龄较小,男性患者和嗅觉异常患者的比例较高。在初始嗅觉功能测试中,COVID 组的 TDI、辨别和识别评分明显高于非 COVID 组。无论组如何,PIOD 患者在治疗后 TDI 评分均显著升高。COVID 组的阈值评分显著增加了 1.38,而非 COVID 组的识别评分显著增加了 2.67。与非 COVID-19 相关 OD 患者相比,COVID-19 相关 OD 患者年龄较小,男性患者较多,嗅觉异常发生率较高,初始嗅觉功能测试结果较好。治疗后,COVID 组的气味检测阈值改善,而非 COVID 组的气味识别改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea7c/11461854/99f389d72296/41598_2024_74629_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea7c/11461854/ae2a0d42993e/41598_2024_74629_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea7c/11461854/a5d9002392e6/41598_2024_74629_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea7c/11461854/99f389d72296/41598_2024_74629_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea7c/11461854/ae2a0d42993e/41598_2024_74629_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea7c/11461854/a5d9002392e6/41598_2024_74629_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea7c/11461854/99f389d72296/41598_2024_74629_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative analyses of post-infectious olfactory dysfunction between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases.新冠病毒与非新冠病毒感染后嗅觉功能障碍的比较分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 9;14(1):23511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74629-5.
2
Persistent COVID-19 parosmia and olfactory loss post olfactory training: randomized clinical trial comparing central and peripheral-acting therapeutics.持续性 COVID-19 嗅觉异常和嗅觉训练后嗅觉丧失:比较中枢和外周作用治疗药物的随机临床试验。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jul;281(7):3671-3678. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08548-6. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
3
Parosmia in patients with post-infectious olfactory dysfunction in the era of COVID-19-associated olfactory impairment.新冠病毒相关嗅觉障碍流行时期,感染后嗅觉障碍患者的嗅觉异常。
HNO. 2024 Sep;72(9):649-656. doi: 10.1007/s00106-024-01470-7. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
4
Parosmia is Associated with Relevant Olfactory Recovery After Olfactory Training.幻嗅与嗅觉训练后的相关嗅觉恢复有关。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Mar;131(3):618-623. doi: 10.1002/lary.29277. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
5
Comparative Analysis of Olfactory and Gustatory Function of Patients With COVID-19 Olfactory Dysfunction and Non-COVID-19 Postinfectious Olfactory Dysfunction.COVID-19 嗅觉功能障碍与非 COVID-19 感染后嗅觉障碍患者嗅觉和味觉功能的比较分析。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Nov 6;38(43):e352. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e352.
6
Gaining Back What Is Lost: Recovering the Sense of Smell in Mild to Moderate Patients After COVID-19.重拾失去的嗅觉:新冠康复患者中轻度至中度嗅觉丧失的嗅觉恢复。
Chem Senses. 2020 Dec 5;45(9):875-881. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaa066.
7
Olfactory-related Quality of Life Adjustments in Smell Loss during the Coronavirus-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间嗅觉丧失相关的生活质量调整。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2022 Mar;36(2):253-260. doi: 10.1177/19458924211053118. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
8
Comparison of prevalence and evolution of COVID-19 olfactory disorders in patients infected by D614 (wild) and B.1.1.7. Alpha variant: a brief report.D614(野生)和 B.1.1.7. Alpha 变异株感染患者 COVID-19 嗅觉障碍的患病率和演变比较:简短报告。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jul;280(7):3461-3467. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07923-z. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
9
Clinical Features of Parosmia Associated With COVID-19 Infection.与 COVID-19 感染相关的嗅觉障碍的临床特征。
Laryngoscope. 2022 Mar;132(3):633-639. doi: 10.1002/lary.29982. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
10
Long-lasting olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients.新冠病毒感染患者的持久嗅觉功能障碍。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jul;279(7):3485-3492. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07153-1. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Position paper on olfactory dysfunction: 2023.关于嗅觉功能障碍的立场文件:2023 年。
Rhinology. 2023 Oct 1;61(33):1-108. doi: 10.4193/Rhin22.483.
2
Olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19: new insights into the underlying mechanisms.新冠病毒感染导致的嗅觉功能障碍:潜在机制的新认识。
Trends Neurosci. 2023 Jan;46(1):75-90. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2022.11.003. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
3
Therapeutic options of post-COVID-19 related olfactory dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.新冠病毒感染后相关嗅觉功能障碍的治疗选择:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
Rhinology. 2023 Feb 1;61(1):2-11. doi: 10.4193/Rhin22.221.
4
Recovery rates and parosmia in olfactory loss during the COVID-19 era.新冠疫情期间嗅觉丧失的恢复率和嗅觉异常。
Dan Med J. 2022 Aug 9;69(9):A04220271.
5
Olfactory training - Thirteen years of research reviewed.嗅觉训练——十三年的研究综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Oct;141:104853. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104853. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
6
Prognosis and persistence of smell and taste dysfunction in patients with covid-19: meta-analysis with parametric cure modelling of recovery curves.新冠病毒感染者嗅觉和味觉功能障碍的预后和持续性:使用参数治愈模型对恢复曲线进行荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2022 Jul 27;378:e069503. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069503.
7
Population differences between COVID-19 and other postviral olfactory dysfunction: Results from a large case-control study.新型冠状病毒肺炎与其他病毒感染后嗅觉功能障碍的人群差异:一项大型病例对照研究的结果
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Aug;12(8):1063-1066. doi: 10.1002/alr.22955. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
8
Visualizing in deceased COVID-19 patients how SARS-CoV-2 attacks the respiratory and olfactory mucosae but spares the olfactory bulb.在已故的 COVID-19 患者中观察到,SARS-CoV-2 如何攻击呼吸道和嗅觉黏膜,但嗅觉球不受影响。
Cell. 2021 Nov 24;184(24):5932-5949.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.027. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
9
Qualitative smell/taste disorders as sequelae of acute COVID-19.急性 COVID-19 后遗症中的嗅觉/味觉定性障碍。
Neurol Sci. 2021 Dec;42(12):4921-4926. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05611-6. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
10
Post-viral effects of COVID-19 in the olfactory system and their implications.COVID-19 后嗅觉系统的病毒后效应及其意义。
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Sep;20(9):753-761. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00182-4. Epub 2021 Jul 30.