Department of Food Agricultural and Biological Engineering, The Ohio State University, OH, Columbus, USA.
Department of Research and Development, Engineering Ministries International, Kajjansi, Uganda.
Environ Monit Assess. 2024 Oct 9;196(11):1037. doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-13143-7.
As urbanization accelerates worldwide, municipalities are attempting to construct new green spaces within their borders. The perceived ecological value of these places is frequently tied to their ability to attract urban wildlife, such as birds, which can easily be observed and enjoyed. As one strategy, stormwater is now frequently managed with green infrastructure: planted areas that retain and treat stormwater rather than merely directing it to surface waters. While these practices have the potential to provide habitat for urban wildlife, the ecological effects of these systems are largely unknown. To assess whether one green infrastructure project increases habitat value, we used passive acoustic monitoring to survey urban bird communities in and near a large green infrastructure project in Columbus, Ohio (USA). Bird communities near bioretention cells (rain gardens) were compared to those at nearby lawns and remnant or restored natural areas. We found that recently installed bioretention cells tended to support more omnivores, lower-canopy foraging species, and species from a higher diversity of feeding guilds than did nearby lawn control sites. We were unable to detect effects of nearby bioretention installations on bird species richness at other sites. The observed differences in species richness were fairly small, and we urge caution when anticipating the habitat value of bioretention cells, at least for bird species. However, the results that we observed suggest that bioretention cells could have a more positive impact on bird communities in different contexts or using different design strategies. The bioretention cells surveyed in this study were small and only planted in grasses and forbs, potentially limiting their ability to offer complex habitat. They were also relatively young, and future work is needed to determine their long-term effect on avian communities and biodiversity of other taxa.
随着全球城市化进程的加速,各城市都在尝试于其辖区内建造新的绿色空间。这些地方的生态价值往往与其吸引城市野生动物的能力有关,例如鸟类,这些动物很容易被观察和欣赏。作为一种策略,雨水现在经常通过绿色基础设施进行管理:种植区可以保留和处理雨水,而不仅仅是将其导向地表水。虽然这些做法有可能为城市野生动物提供栖息地,但这些系统的生态影响在很大程度上尚未可知。为了评估一个绿色基础设施项目是否增加了栖息地价值,我们使用被动声学监测来调查俄亥俄州哥伦布市一个大型绿色基础设施项目及其周边的城市鸟类群落。我们比较了生物滞留池(雨水花园)附近的鸟类群落与附近草坪和残余或恢复的自然区域的鸟类群落。我们发现,最近安装的生物滞留池往往比附近的草坪对照点支持更多的杂食性鸟类、低冠层觅食物种以及更多不同取食群体的物种。我们无法检测到附近生物滞留设施对其他地点鸟类物种丰富度的影响。观察到的物种丰富度差异相当小,因此在预测生物滞留池的栖息地价值时,我们应谨慎行事,至少对于鸟类物种而言是这样。然而,我们观察到的结果表明,生物滞留池在不同的情况下或使用不同的设计策略,可能对鸟类群落产生更积极的影响。本研究中调查的生物滞留池较小,仅种植在草和草本植物中,可能限制了它们提供复杂栖息地的能力。它们也相对较年轻,需要进一步的工作来确定它们对鸟类群落和其他类群生物多样性的长期影响。