Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Department of Oncology/Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, West China, China.
BMC Cancer. 2024 Oct 9;24(1):1246. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13027-6.
Although associations have been reported linking pretreatment thrombocytosis to cancer survival outcomes, the validity and strength of existing observational evidence have been contested. This study aimed to conduct an umbrella review to comprehensively appraise the strength, validity and credibility of these reported associations.
We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to 8 April 2023 to retrieve meta-analyses of observational studies. Meta-analyses were re-performed using a random-effect model and the strength of evidence was graded as convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive and weak according to seven pre-defined quantitative criteria reflecting statistical significance, amount of data, heterogeneity, and evidence of bias. The quality of review was appraised using the AMSTAR2 checklist. The umbrella review was reported adhering to the PRISMA guideline and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023455391).
A total of 21 unique meta-analyses investigating ten cancer subtypes were included. All meta-analyses reported inferior survival outcome in cancer patients with pretreatment thrombocytosis, and 18 of them (85.7%) yielded statistically significant results (P < 0.05). Consistent effects were observed across meta-analyses that adopted different cut-off values (i.e. platelet count > 300 or 400 × 10 /L) to define thrombocytosis. Although evidence appraisal did not identify convincing evidence (Class I), the associations of thrombocytosis with inferior overall survival of lung, gastric, colorectal cancer and malignant mesothelioma were classified as highly suggestive evidence (Class II). According to AMSTAR2 ratings, no meta-analysis was identified with high or moderate quality.
Our findings consolidated the association between pretreatment thrombocytosis and poor survival outcomes in various cancers. Nonetheless, the absence of convincing associations indicates a need for further large-scale, high-quality evidence to confirm whether platelets can serve as a prognostic predictor or a therapeutic target.
尽管已经有研究报道称,治疗前血小板增多与癌症生存结局相关,但现有的观察性证据的有效性和强度一直存在争议。本研究旨在进行伞式综述,全面评估这些报道的相关性的强度、有效性和可信度。
我们检索了 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库,从建库到 2023 年 4 月 8 日,以检索观察性研究的荟萃分析。使用随机效应模型重新进行荟萃分析,并根据七个预先定义的定量标准(反映统计学意义、数据量、异质性和偏倚证据),将证据强度评为有说服力、高度提示、提示和弱。使用 AMSTAR2 清单评估综述的质量。该伞式综述按照 PRISMA 指南进行报告,并在 PROSPERO(CRD42023455391)上进行了注册。
共纳入 21 项研究十种癌症亚型的独特荟萃分析。所有荟萃分析均报告治疗前血小板增多的癌症患者生存结局较差,其中 18 项(85.7%)的结果具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。采用不同截断值(即血小板计数>300 或 400×10/L)定义血小板增多的荟萃分析均观察到一致的效果。尽管证据评估未发现有说服力的证据(I 类),但血小板增多与肺癌、胃癌、结直肠癌和恶性间皮瘤的总体生存率降低之间的相关性被归类为高度提示性证据(II 类)。根据 AMSTAR2 评分,没有一项荟萃分析被评为高质量或中质量。
我们的研究结果证实了治疗前血小板增多与多种癌症不良生存结局之间的相关性。然而,由于缺乏有说服力的相关性,需要进一步开展大规模、高质量的研究来证实血小板是否可以作为预后预测指标或治疗靶点。