Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shenyang Medical College, 5 Nanqi West Road, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110024, China.
Liaoning Province Key Laboratory for Phenomics of Human Ethnic Specificity and Critical Illness, Shenyang Key Laboratory for Phenomics, Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 9;25(1):796. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07920-1.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combined core decompression (CD), bone grafting (BG), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in treating early-stage avascular necrosis of the femoral head (ANFH).
A retrospective study was conducted on 74 patients (85 hips) with Ficat-Arlet stage I-II ANFH who were treated at our hospital between May 2015 and May 2018. The control group (20 patients, 22 hips) received symptomatic treatments, including weight-bearing reduction and oral analgesics. The CD + BG group (29 patients, 34 hips) underwent CD and β-tricalcium phosphate bone grafting. The PRP combination group (25 patients, 29 hips) received PRP injections in addition to CD and BG. Patients were followed up for five years to assess the necessity for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Data analysis was performed on those from the CD + BG and PRP groups who did not require THA. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and the proportion of patients not accepting THA.
At the five-year follow-up, the rate of THA in the control group was 68.18% (15/22), while in the CD + BG group and the PRP combination group, the rates were 17.65% (6/34) and 10.34% (3/29), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the CD + BG group and the PRP combination group (P = 0.441), but both differed significantly from the control group (P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that over time, the proportion of patients in the PRP combination group who did not require THA was consistently higher than that in the CD + BG group. Among patients who did not undergo THA, the proportion of Ficat-Arlet stage I-II patients in the PRP combination group was 88.46% (23/26), which was higher than the 64.29% (18/28) in the CD + BG group, showing a significant difference (P = 0.038). VAS score and HHS were compared between the two groups at 6 months, 12 months, and the last follow-up point, with patients in the PRP combination group showing better scores than those in the CD + BG group (p < 0.05) in both metrics.
The combination therapy of CD, BG, and PRP demonstrates significant advantages in improving symptoms and delaying disease progression in early-stage ANFH.
本研究旨在评估核心减压(CD)、植骨(BG)和富血小板血浆(PRP)联合治疗早期股骨头缺血性坏死(ANFH)的疗效。
对 2015 年 5 月至 2018 年 5 月在我院治疗的 Ficat-Arlet Ⅰ-Ⅱ期 ANFH 患者 74 例(85 髋)进行回顾性研究。对照组(20 例,22 髋)接受对症治疗,包括减轻负重和口服镇痛药。CD+BG 组(29 例,34 髋)行 CD 和β-磷酸三钙植骨。PRP 联合组(25 例,29 髋)在 CD 和 BG 治疗的基础上给予 PRP 注射。患者随访 5 年,评估全髋关节置换术(THA)的必要性。对未行 THA 的 CD+BG 组和 PRP 联合组患者进行数据分析。采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Harris 髋关节评分(HHS)和不接受 THA 的患者比例评估临床疗效。
随访 5 年,对照组 THA 率为 68.18%(15/22),CD+BG 组和 PRP 联合组分别为 17.65%(6/34)和 10.34%(3/29)。CD+BG 组与 PRP 联合组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.441),但均明显低于对照组(P<0.001)。Kaplan-Meier 生存分析显示,随时间推移,PRP 联合组中无需 THA 的患者比例持续高于 CD+BG 组。在未行 THA 的患者中,PRP 联合组 Ficat-Arlet Ⅰ-Ⅱ期患者比例为 88.46%(23/26),高于 CD+BG 组的 64.29%(18/28),差异有统计学意义(P=0.038)。两组患者在 6 个月、12 个月和末次随访时进行 VAS 评分和 HHS 比较,PRP 联合组患者评分均优于 CD+BG 组(p<0.05)。
CD、BG 和 PRP 联合治疗在改善早期 ANFH 症状和延缓疾病进展方面具有显著优势。