Atallah-Yunes Suheil Albert, Rees Matthew J, Witzig Thomas E, Habermann Thomas M, Munoz Javier, Iqbal Madiha, McPhail Ellen D, Nowakowski Grzegorz S
Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.
Haematologica. 2025 Feb 1;110(2):448-456. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2024.286168.
Intensified chemoimmunotherapy regimens are often used in young patients with double-hit and triple-hit lymphoma (DHL/ THL) despite no survival benefit compared to R-CHOP. Favorable retrospective reports on the application of CODOX-M/IVAC-R are subject to selection bias as only young fit patients can tolerate this treatment. We conducted a retrospective analysis to investigate outcome differences between CODOX-M/IVAC-R and DA-EPOCH-R in DHL/THL patients aged 60 years or younger. One hundred and thirteen patients were identified; CODOX-M/IVAC-R (N=49) and DA-EPOCH-R (N=64). Eighty percent (39/49) achieved complete (CR) after completing CODOX-M/IVAC-R compared to 58% (37/64) with DA-EPOCH-R. The median follow-up was 5.3 years and 3.3 years for the CODOX-M/IVAC-R and DA-EPOCH-R group respectively. CODOX-M/IVAC-R demonstrated superior event-free survival (EFS) on univariate (hazard ratio [HR]=0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.97) and multivariable analysis adjusted for age, BCL translocation (BCL2 vs. BCL6 vs. both), International Prognostic Index score and receipt of autologous stem cell transplant (adjusted HR [aHR]=0.52, 95% CI: 0.29-0.93); however there was no significant influence on OS (aHR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.46-1.84). The 1, 2 and 5 years EFS in the CODOX-M/IVAC-R group was 68.3%, 64.1% and 61.5%, respectively compared to 52.4%, 48.9% and 39.5%, respectively in the DA-EPOCH-R group. Primary refractory disease or relapse (R/R) occurred in 33% (16/49) of CODOX-M/IVAC-R and 54% (35/64) of DA-EPOCH-R recipients, and produced median OS of 10.3 months and 33.7 months, respectively, indicating poor outcomes in the CODOX-M/IVAC-R subgroup with R/R disease. More patients were able to receive subsequent salvage therapies in the DA-EPOCH-R group. No patients died of regimen toxicity and the rates of central nervous system relapse and therapy related hematologic neoplasms were similar in both groups.
强化化疗免疫治疗方案常用于年轻的双打击和三打击淋巴瘤(DHL/THL)患者,尽管与R-CHOP方案相比并无生存获益。关于CODOX-M/IVAC-R应用的有利回顾性报告存在选择偏倚,因为只有年轻健康的患者才能耐受这种治疗。我们进行了一项回顾性分析,以调查60岁及以下DHL/THL患者中CODOX-M/IVAC-R和DA-EPOCH-R之间的预后差异。共纳入113例患者;其中CODOX-M/IVAC-R组49例,DA-EPOCH-R组64例。完成CODOX-M/IVAC-R治疗后,80%(39/49)的患者达到完全缓解(CR),而DA-EPOCH-R组为58%(37/64)。CODOX-M/IVAC-R组和DA-EPOCH-R组的中位随访时间分别为5.3年和3.3年。单因素分析显示CODOX-M/IVAC-R的无事件生存期(EFS)更优(风险比[HR]=0.54,95%置信区间[CI]:0.31-0.97),多因素分析在调整年龄、BCL易位(BCL2与BCL6与两者皆有)、国际预后指数评分和自体干细胞移植接受情况后,结果相似(调整后HR[aHR]=0.52,95%CI:0.29-0.93);然而,对总生存期(OS)无显著影响(aHR=0.92,95%CI:0.46-1.84)。CODOX-M/IVAC-R组1年、2年和5年的EFS分别为68.3%、64.1%和61.5%,而DA-EPOCH-R组分别为52.4%、48.9%和39.5%。CODOX-M/IVAC-R组33%(16/49)的患者出现原发性难治性疾病或复发(R/R),DA-EPOCH-R组为54%(35/64),其OS中位数分别为10.3个月和33.7个月,表明CODOX-M/IVAC-R组中R/R疾病患者的预后较差。DA-EPOCH-R组中有更多患者能够接受后续挽救治疗。两组均无患者死于方案毒性,中枢神经系统复发率和治疗相关血液肿瘤发生率相似。