• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情期间的劳动力市场:拉丁美洲的差距与挑战

Labor markets during COVID-19: gaps and challenges in Latin America.

作者信息

Martínez-Martínez Oscar A, Reyes-Martínez Javier, Mideros Mora Andrés Iván, Sánchez Pilco Andrea Carolina, Rodríguez Salme Camila Lucia

机构信息

Departamento de Ciencias Sociales y Políticas, Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City, Mexico.

División de Administración Pública, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

Front Sociol. 2024 Sep 25;9:1372404. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1372404. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1372404
PMID:39385977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11461472/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on Latin American labor markets continue to be quantified, to identify the social and economic impacts that this pandemic had, and to design more efficient public policies that would protect the most vulnerable groups. For this reason, the research question was as follows: what were the changes in the labor formality rates before and two years after the main contingency measures of the COVID-19 pandemic were implemented?

METHODS

Using data from Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru, and Uruguay, the formality rate (τ) was analyzed, which was calculated using a weighted average between the formal employment rates of the number (i) of economic sectors (p) in a specific period (t).

RESULTS

The results suggest that the weighted labor formality rate increased in the countries of the region. These changes in formality could be the result of greater capital accumulation, the integration of productive processes, the integration of commercialization processes, and differentiated fiscal stimuli (i.e., the intrasectoral aspect), but it was not due to the displacement of workers from highly informal economic sectors to more formalized sectors (i.e., the intersectoral component).

DISCUSSION

The findings emphasized the precarious situation of women in the region, regardless of the country, particularly in Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, and Argentina. These findings suggest the need to design public policies that reverse the current situation of the labor market and prevent future economic shocks, with special emphasis on the informal sector and women.

摘要

引言

新冠疫情对拉丁美洲劳动力市场的影响仍在量化之中,目的是确定这场疫情所产生的社会和经济影响,并设计出更有效的公共政策来保护最弱势群体。因此,研究问题如下:在实施新冠疫情主要应急措施之前及之后两年,劳动力正规化率有哪些变化?

方法

利用阿根廷、玻利维亚、智利、哥伦比亚、厄瓜多尔、危地马拉、墨西哥、秘鲁和乌拉圭的数据,对正规化率(τ)进行了分析,该比率是通过特定时期(t)内经济部门(p)数量(i)的正规就业率的加权平均值计算得出的。

结果

结果表明,该地区各国的加权劳动力正规化率有所上升。正规化方面的这些变化可能是资本积累增加、生产流程整合、商业化流程整合以及差异化财政刺激(即部门内部因素)的结果,但并非由于工人从高度非正规经济部门转移到更正规化部门(即部门间因素)。

讨论

研究结果强调了该地区女性所处的不稳定状况,无论在哪个国家都是如此,尤其是在厄瓜多尔、秘鲁、玻利维亚和阿根廷。这些结果表明,有必要设计公共政策来扭转当前劳动力市场的状况,并预防未来的经济冲击,特别要关注非正规部门和女性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd0d/11461472/8ad7008ec70b/fsoc-09-1372404-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd0d/11461472/8ad7008ec70b/fsoc-09-1372404-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd0d/11461472/8ad7008ec70b/fsoc-09-1372404-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Labor markets during COVID-19: gaps and challenges in Latin America.新冠疫情期间的劳动力市场:拉丁美洲的差距与挑战
Front Sociol. 2024 Sep 25;9:1372404. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1372404. eCollection 2024.
2
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
3
COVID-19 blues: Lockdowns and mental health-related google searches in Latin America.新冠疫情引发的忧郁情绪:拉丁美洲的封锁措施与心理健康相关的谷歌搜索情况
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jul;281:114040. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114040. Epub 2021 May 25.
4
[The dynamic of the informal urban sector in Mexico: the role of intersectoral mobility].[墨西哥非正规城市部门的动态:部门间流动的作用]
Tiers Monde. 1992 Oct-Dec;33(132):893-924.
5
[In the America of mountain ranges, the brief summer of Indian agrarian movements (1970-1991)].[在山脉纵横的美国,印度农业运动的短暂夏天(1970 - 1991年)]
Tiers Monde. 1991 Oct-Dec;32(128):831-49.
6
A Survey on One Health Approach in Colombia and Some Latin American Countries: From a Fragmented Health Organization to an Integrated Health Response to Global Challenges.关于哥伦比亚和一些拉丁美洲国家的“One Health”方法的调查:从碎片化的卫生组织到综合卫生应对全球挑战。
Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 25;9:649240. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.649240. eCollection 2021.
7
[Speech by Oscar Julian Bardeci, director of the Centro Latinoamericano de Demografia (CELADE), at the Latinamerican Regional Meeting prior to the International Conference on Population in recognition of the Second Meeting on Population by the Committee of Upper-Level Government Experts (CEGAN), Havana, Cuba, November 16-19, 1983].[拉丁美洲人口中心(CELADE)主任奥斯卡·朱利安·巴德西在国际人口会议之前举行的拉丁美洲区域会议上的讲话,此次会议是为了纪念高级别政府专家委员会(CEGAN)第二次人口会议,于1983年11月16日至19日在古巴哈瓦那举行]
Notas Poblacion. 1983 Dec;11(33):151-64.
8
[Prenatal care in Latin America].[拉丁美洲的产前护理]
Salud Publica Mex. 1990 Nov-Dec;32(6):673-84.
9
[Women in labor and migration. The female labor market between 1950 and 1990 and migration of women to Santiago, Chile].[劳动与移民中的女性。1950年至1990年间的女性劳动力市场以及智利女性向圣地亚哥的移民]
Notas Poblacion. 1994 Jun;22(59):9-50.
10
[Agreement and asymmetry. Population and wages vis vis a vis the globalization of the economy].[协议与不对称。相对于经济全球化的人口与工资]
Demos. 1991(4):30-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Social protection and informality in Latin America during the COVID-19 pandemic.拉丁美洲在 COVID-19 大流行期间的社会保护与非正规性
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 4;16(11):e0259050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259050. eCollection 2021.
2
Impacts and Strategies Behind COVID-19-Induced Economic Crisis: Evidence from Informal Economy.新冠疫情引发的经济危机背后的影响与策略:来自非正规经济的证据
Indian J Labour Econ. 2021;64(3):641-661. doi: 10.1007/s41027-021-00333-x. Epub 2021 Aug 24.