• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拉丁美洲在 COVID-19 大流行期间的社会保护与非正规性

Social protection and informality in Latin America during the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Research Department, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Nov 4;16(11):e0259050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259050. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0259050
PMID:34735496
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8568185/
Abstract

Latin American governments swiftly implemented income assistance programs to sustain families' livelihoods during COVID-19 stay-at-home orders. This paper analyzes the potential coverage and generosity of these measures and assesses the suitability of current safety nets to deal with unexpected negative income shocks in 10 Latin American countries. The expansion of pre-existing programs (most notably conditional cash transfers and non-contributory pensions) during the COVID-19 crisis was generally insufficient to compensate for the inability to work among the poorest segments of the population. When COVID-19 ad hoc programs are analyzed, the coverage and replacement rates of regular labor income among households in the first quintile of the country's labor income distribution increase substantially. Yet, these programs present substantial coverage challenges among families composed of fundamentally informal workers who are non-poor, but are at a high risk of poverty. These results highlight the limitations of the fragmented nature of social protection systems in the region.

摘要

拉丁美洲政府在 COVID-19 居家令期间迅速实施了收入援助计划,以维持家庭生计。本文分析了这些措施的潜在覆盖范围和慷慨程度,并评估了当前安全网在应对拉丁美洲 10 个国家意外负面收入冲击的适宜性。在 COVID-19 危机期间,扩大现有计划(尤其是有条件现金转移支付和非缴费型养恤金)的范围通常不足以弥补最贫困人口无法工作的问题。在分析 COVID-19 特别计划时,在国家劳动收入分配中处于第一五分位的家庭中,正规劳动收入的覆盖范围和替代率大大增加。然而,这些计划在由非贫困但处于高度贫困风险的基本非正规工人组成的家庭中存在重大的覆盖范围挑战。这些结果突出了该地区社会保护系统分散性质的局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0399/8568185/507b9b177186/pone.0259050.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0399/8568185/507b9b177186/pone.0259050.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0399/8568185/507b9b177186/pone.0259050.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Social protection and informality in Latin America during the COVID-19 pandemic.拉丁美洲在 COVID-19 大流行期间的社会保护与非正规性
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 4;16(11):e0259050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259050. eCollection 2021.
2
Informality in the time of COVID-19 in Latin America: Implications and policy options.拉丁美洲的 COVID-19 时代的不拘礼节:影响和政策选择。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0261277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261277. eCollection 2021.
3
Evaluation and Forecasting Analysis of the Association of Conditional Cash Transfer With Child Mortality in Latin America, 2000-2030.评估和预测分析条件性现金转移与拉丁美洲儿童死亡率的关联,2000-2030 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2323489. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23489.
4
Poverty in America: trends and new patterns.美国的贫困:趋势与新模式。
Popul Bull. 1985 Jun;40(3):1-44.
5
A diagonal and social protection plus approach to meet the challenges of the COVID-19 syndemic: cash transfers and intimate partner violence interventions in Latin America.对角和社会保护增强方法应对 COVID-19 双重流行带来的挑战:拉丁美洲的现金转移和亲密伴侣暴力干预。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Jan;10(1):e148-e153. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00444-7. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
6
Social epidemiology of urban COVID-19 inequalities in Latin America and Canada.拉丁美洲和加拿大城市 COVID-19 不平等的社会流行病学。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Oct 17;23(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02301-5.
7
Income insecurity and social protection: Examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across income groups.收入不稳定与社会保护:探究新冠疫情对各收入群体的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 20;19(9):e0310680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310680. eCollection 2024.
8
Public health matters: why is Latin America struggling in addressing the pandemic?公共卫生事务:为何拉丁美洲在应对大流行方面举步维艰?
J Public Health Policy. 2021 Mar;42(1):27-40. doi: 10.1057/s41271-020-00269-4. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
9
The unequal impact of the coronavirus pandemic: Evidence from seventeen developing countries.新冠疫情大流行的不平等影响:来自十七个发展中国家的证据。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0239797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239797. eCollection 2020.
10
Obesity and COVID-19 in Latin America: A tragedy of two pandemics-Official document of the Latin American Federation of Obesity Societies.拉丁美洲的肥胖与 COVID-19:两大疫情下的悲剧——拉丁美洲肥胖学会联合会官方文件。
Obes Rev. 2021 Mar;22(3):e13165. doi: 10.1111/obr.13165. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Socioeconomic inequalities in Chile during the COVID-19 pandemic: A regional analysis of income poverty.新冠疫情期间智利的社会经济不平等:收入贫困的区域分析
PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0323409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323409. eCollection 2025.
2
Volvamos Juntos: evaluation of the implementation of a Social Health Intervention to mitigate the impact of Covid-19 in businesses in Antofagasta, Chile.我们一起回归:对一项社会健康干预措施实施情况的评估,该措施旨在减轻新冠疫情对智利安托法加斯塔企业的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 14;25(1):1009. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21297-3.
3
Labor markets during COVID-19: gaps and challenges in Latin America.

本文引用的文献

1
Too little but not too late: nowcasting poverty and cash transfers' incidence during COVID-19's crisis.虽少但不算晚:对新冠疫情危机期间贫困状况及现金转移发生率进行实时预测
World Dev. 2021 Apr;140:105227. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105227. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
2
Which workers bear the burden of social distancing?哪些劳动者承担着社交距离的负担?
J Econ Inequal. 2021;19(3):509-526. doi: 10.1007/s10888-021-09487-6. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
3
The distributional consequences of social distancing on poverty and labour income inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean.
新冠疫情期间的劳动力市场:拉丁美洲的差距与挑战
Front Sociol. 2024 Sep 25;9:1372404. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1372404. eCollection 2024.
4
Tax progressivity and taxing the rich in developing countries: lessons from Latin America.发展中国家的税收累进性与对富人征税:来自拉丁美洲的经验教训。
Oxf Rev Econ Policy. 2023 Fall;39(3):530-549. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grad029. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
5
Social determinants of health in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic: strengths and limitations of emergency responses.新冠疫情期间巴西健康问题的社会决定因素:应急响应的优势与局限
Health Aff Sch. 2023 Jun 20;1(1):qxad014. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad014. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Unveiling the intellectual structure of informality: Insights from the socioeconomic literature.揭示非正式性的知识结构:社会经济文献的启示。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 31;19(1):e0297577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297577. eCollection 2024.
7
Cross-cultural invariance of the Spanish version of the COVID-19 Assessment Scorecard to measure the perception of government actions against COVID-19 in Latin America.用于衡量拉丁美洲对政府抗击新冠疫情行动认知的新冠疫情评估记分卡西班牙语版本的跨文化不变性。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2023 Nov 8;36(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s41155-023-00277-9.
8
Dietary patterns, social determinants, and emotions during COVID-19 confinement in Panama: An online survey.巴拿马新冠疫情居家隔离期间的饮食模式、社会决定因素及情绪:一项在线调查
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 5;6(4):e1168. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1168. eCollection 2023 Apr.
9
The Work, Economic, and Remittance Stress and Distress of the COVID-19 Pandemic Containment Policies: The Case of Venezuelan Migrants in Argentina and Chile.《COVID-19 大流行遏制政策的工作、经济和汇款压力与困扰:以阿根廷和智利的委内瑞拉移民为例》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 17;20(4):3569. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043569.
10
Learning from the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: Comparing policy responses in Uruguay with 10 other Latin American and Caribbean countries.从新冠疫情第一波中学习:比较乌拉圭与其他10个拉丁美洲和加勒比国家的政策应对措施。
Health Policy Open. 2022 Dec;3:100081. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2022.100081. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
社交距离措施对拉丁美洲和加勒比地区贫困及劳动收入不平等的分布影响。
J Popul Econ. 2021;34(4):1385-1443. doi: 10.1007/s00148-021-00854-1. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
4
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
5
Income-related health inequalities associated with the coronavirus pandemic in South Africa: A decomposition analysis.南非冠状病毒大流行相关的与收入有关的健康不平等:分解分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jan 7;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01361-7.
6
The unequal impact of the coronavirus pandemic: Evidence from seventeen developing countries.新冠疫情大流行的不平等影响:来自十七个发展中国家的证据。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0239797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239797. eCollection 2020.
7
How many jobs can be done at home?有多少工作可以在家完成?
J Public Econ. 2020 Sep;189:104235. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104235. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
8
Government of Malawi's unconditional cash transfer improves youth mental health.马拉维政府无条件现金转移改善了青年心理健康。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Mar;225:108-119. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.037. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
9
Do Conditional Cash Transfers Improve Child Health? Evidence from PROGRESA’s Control Randomized Experiment.有条件现金转移支付能否改善儿童健康状况?来自 Progresa 对照随机试验的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2004;94(2):336-41. doi: 10.1257/0002828041302109.
10
Investments in children's health and the Kenyan cash transfer for orphans and vulnerable children: evidence from an unconditional cash transfer scheme.对儿童健康的投资以及肯尼亚针对孤儿和弱势儿童的现金转移支付:来自一项无条件现金转移支付计划的证据。
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Sep 1;32(7):943-955. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw181.