Buijs George S, Kievit Arthur J, Schafroth Matthias U, Blankevoort Leendert
Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sport Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Musculoskeletal Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Orthop. 2024 Aug 11;59:106-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.08.007. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a widely conducted and successful orthopedic procedure. However, aseptic loosening, a common cause of TKA failure, necessitates revision surgery. Diagnostic accuracy of triphasic bone scintigraphy, a common imaging modality for aseptic loosening detection, remains controversial. This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of bone scintigraphy when separately evaluated by a nuclear physicist and an orthopedic surgeon, and the interrater reliability between the two.
Patients undergoing knee revision surgery due to suspected aseptic loosening at three medical centers from 2006 to 2023 were included. Relevant demographic, clinical, and procedural data were extracted from the records. The bone scintigraphy results as noted by the nuclear physicist and orthopedic surgeon were used as index test and intraoperative findings of loosening were used as reference tests. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated, and kappa's agreement was assessed.
Out of 611 revision TKAs, 59 cases were analyzed. The nuclear physicist's evaluation of bone scintigraphy had a sensitivity of 73 %, specificity of 0 %, positive predictive value of 93 %, negative predictive value of 0 %, and diagnostic accuracy of 69 %. The orthopedic surgeon's evaluation showed higher sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and an accuracy of 84 %. Agreement levels were moderate (kappa = 0.46) between the nuclear physicist's and orthopedic surgeons evaluation.
The diagnostic accuracy of bone scintigraphy for aseptic loosening is 84 % when evaluated by the orthopedic surgeon compared to 69 % for the nuclear physicist's evaluation. Kappa's agreement between the two was moderate.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)是一种广泛开展且成功的骨科手术。然而,无菌性松动作为TKA失败的常见原因,需要进行翻修手术。三相骨闪烁显像作为检测无菌性松动的常用影像学方法,其诊断准确性仍存在争议。本研究调查了由核物理学家和骨科医生分别评估时骨闪烁显像的诊断准确性,以及两者之间的评分者间可靠性。
纳入2006年至2023年在三个医疗中心因疑似无菌性松动而接受膝关节翻修手术的患者。从记录中提取相关的人口统计学、临床和手术数据。将核物理学家和骨科医生记录的骨闪烁显像结果用作指标测试,术中松动的发现用作参考测试。计算准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,并评估kappa一致性。
在611例翻修TKA中,分析了59例。核物理学家对骨闪烁显像的评估敏感性为73%,特异性为0%,阳性预测值为93%,阴性预测值为0%,诊断准确性为69%。骨科医生的评估显示出更高的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值,准确性为84%。核物理学家和骨科医生评估之间的一致性水平为中等(kappa = 0.46)。
骨科医生评估时骨闪烁显像对无菌性松动的诊断准确性为84%,而核物理学家评估时为69%。两者之间的kappa一致性为中等。