• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超低位前切除术-肛门内括约肌间切开术联合全固有筋膜切除术治疗位于直肠后壁的极低位直肠癌:一种更能满意控制局部复发的技术。

A New Approach to Ultra-Low Anterior Resection-Intersphincteric Dissection With Total Hiatal Ligament Excision for Very Low Rectal Cancer Located in the Posterior Wall of the Rectum: A More Satisfactory Technique for Local Recurrence Control.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Regional Medical Center, Binhai Campus of the First Affiliated Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2024 Oct;13(19):e70307. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70307.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.70307
PMID:39387535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11465284/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The hiatal ligament, as the anatomical landmark for the completion of total mesorectal excision (TME) for ultra-low rectal cancer, represents a continuation of the longitudinal muscle of the rectum. It receives vascular supply from the median sacral artery and contains lymphatic vessels. In cases where ultra-low rectal cancer is located in the posterior rectal wall, the hiatal ligament may theoretically serve as an anatomical region susceptible to direct tumor cell spread or distant metastasis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of circumferential tumor location (CTL) on postoperative survival of low rectal cancer and to determine the effect of total hiatal ligament excision (THLE) on the prognosis of patients with posterior rectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with ultra-low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic surgery between March 2014 and October 2021 were enrolled in this study. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to compare the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients in the posterior group and the non-posterior group. Prognostic factors were identified using COX regression. PSM analysis was also used in the posterior tumor subgroup to compare the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients in the hiatal ligament traditional transection (HLTT) and THLE groups.

RESULTS

After PSM, OS, and DFS were comparable between the posterior and non-posterior groups. Similarly, no difference was noted in the local recurrence rate between the two groups (p = 0.23). The prognosis of ultra-low rectal cancer was not affected by CTL. However, the local recurrence rate was significantly lower in the THLE group compared with the HLTT group (p = 0.023). Multivariate analysis of the posterior group identified CRM, TNM stage III, and HLTT as independent risk factors for local recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

CTL is not a prognostic risk factor for low rectal cancer. In posterior wall tumors, THLE significantly reduces the local recurrence rate for low rectal cancer.

摘要

背景

裂孔韧带作为完成超低位直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术(TME)的解剖学标志,是直肠纵行肌的延续。它接受来自正中骶动脉的血管供应,并包含淋巴管。在超低位直肠癌位于直肠后壁的情况下,裂孔韧带理论上可能是直接肿瘤细胞扩散或远处转移的解剖区域。

目的

评估环周肿瘤位置(CTL)对低位直肠癌术后生存的影响,并确定全裂孔韧带切除(THLE)对后壁直肠癌患者预后的影响。

方法

本研究纳入了 2014 年 3 月至 2021 年 10 月间接受腹腔镜手术的超低位直肠癌患者。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析比较后组和非后组患者的临床病理特征和预后。使用 COX 回归确定预后因素。在后壁肿瘤亚组中也进行了 PSM 分析,比较裂孔韧带传统横断(HLTT)和 THLE 组患者的临床病理特征和预后。

结果

PSM 后,后组和非后组的 OS 和 DFS 无差异。两组局部复发率也无差异(p=0.23)。CTL 对超低位直肠癌的预后没有影响。然而,THLE 组的局部复发率明显低于 HLTT 组(p=0.023)。对后组的多因素分析确定 CRM、TNM 分期 III 期和 HLTT 为局部无复发生存的独立危险因素。

结论

CTL 不是低位直肠癌的预后危险因素。在后壁肿瘤中,THLE 显著降低了低位直肠癌的局部复发率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53cb/11465284/6ca2fa6281c4/CAM4-13-e70307-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53cb/11465284/e203e8ff61dd/CAM4-13-e70307-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53cb/11465284/73a5ff81186e/CAM4-13-e70307-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53cb/11465284/6ca2fa6281c4/CAM4-13-e70307-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53cb/11465284/e203e8ff61dd/CAM4-13-e70307-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53cb/11465284/73a5ff81186e/CAM4-13-e70307-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53cb/11465284/6ca2fa6281c4/CAM4-13-e70307-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A New Approach to Ultra-Low Anterior Resection-Intersphincteric Dissection With Total Hiatal Ligament Excision for Very Low Rectal Cancer Located in the Posterior Wall of the Rectum: A More Satisfactory Technique for Local Recurrence Control.超低位前切除术-肛门内括约肌间切开术联合全固有筋膜切除术治疗位于直肠后壁的极低位直肠癌:一种更能满意控制局部复发的技术。
Cancer Med. 2024 Oct;13(19):e70307. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70307.
2
[Safety and prognosis analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer].经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的安全性及预后分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 25;25(6):522-530. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20210811-00321.
3
Early Experience With Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Compared With Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的早期经验比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Nov;63(11):1500-1510. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001725.
4
Video. Advantages of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection.视频:经肛门内括约肌间切除术的腹腔镜入路优势。
Surg Endosc. 2011 May;25(5):1661-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1451-x. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
5
Influence of tumor location on short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a propensity score matched cohort study.肿瘤位置对腹腔镜直肠癌手术后短期和长期结局的影响:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 14;20(1):761. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07255-9.
6
Effect of Tumor Location on Outcome After Laparoscopic Low Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.肿瘤位置对腹腔镜低位直肠癌手术后结局的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 May 1;65(5):672-682. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001965.
7
Comparison of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for rectal cancer: A case matched study.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的比较:一项病例匹配研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 May;47(5):1019-1025. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.131. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
8
Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)与 MRI 定义低位直肠癌的腹腔镜 TME 比较:基于倾向评分匹配的肿瘤学结局分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2459-2467. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6530-4. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
9
Evaluation of the frequency and pattern of local recurrence following intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer.超低位直肠癌括约肌间切除术后局部复发的频率及模式评估
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2014 Jun;26(2):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jnci.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
10
The effect of circumferential tumor location in clinical outcomes of rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision.环周肿瘤位置对接受全直肠系膜切除术的直肠癌患者临床结局的影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Dec;48(12):2249-57. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0186-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Transabdominal minimal invasive surgery for ultralow anterior resection-intersphincteric dissection with total hiatal ligament excision and rectal pull-through and eversion for direct access to the distal resection margin - a video vignette.经腹微创手术行超低位前切除术——经括约肌间分离并完全切除食管裂孔韧带、直肠拖出及外翻以直接显露远端切缘——视频病例
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jul;26(7):1465-1466. doi: 10.1111/codi.16992. Epub 2024 Apr 14.
2
Robotic and laparoscopic sphincter-saving resections have similar peri-operative, oncological and functional outcomes in female patients with rectal cancer.在女性直肠癌患者中,机器人手术和腹腔镜保肛切除术在围手术期、肿瘤学及功能方面的结果相似。
Updates Surg. 2023 Dec;75(8):2201-2209. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01686-2. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
3
Transabdominal minimal invasive surgery: intersphincteric dissection with preserved hiatal ligament for ultralow anterior resection - a video vignette.
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Nov;25(11):2266-2267. doi: 10.1111/codi.16735. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
4
International standardization and optimization group for intersphincteric resection (ISOG-ISR): modified Delphi consensus on anatomy, definition, indication, surgical technique, specimen description and functional outcome.国际肛门直肠外科医师协会(ISRA)间置括约肌切除术(ISR)国际标准化与优化工作组:关于解剖、定义、适应证、手术技术、标本描述和功能结果的改良 Delphi 共识。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Sep;25(9):1896-1909. doi: 10.1111/codi.16704. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
5
Robotic male and laparoscopic female sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer share similar specimen quality, complication rates and long-term oncological outcomes.机器人辅助经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜辅助经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的标本质量、并发症发生率及长期肿瘤学结果相似。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1637-1644. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01558-2. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
6
Impact of circumferential tumor location of mid to low rectal cancer on oncologic outcomes after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.中低位直肠癌环周肿瘤位置对术前放化疗后肿瘤学结局的影响
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2022 Aug;103(2):87-95. doi: 10.4174/astr.2022.103.2.87. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
7
Effect of Tumor Location on Outcome After Laparoscopic Low Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.肿瘤位置对腹腔镜低位直肠癌手术后结局的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 May 1;65(5):672-682. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001965.
8
Anus-Preserving Surgery in Advanced Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: A Perspective on Oncological Safety of Intersphincteric Resection.低位进展期直肠癌的保肛手术:关于括约肌间切除术肿瘤学安全性的观点
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 24;13(19):4793. doi: 10.3390/cancers13194793.
9
Recurrence hazard of rectal cancer compared with colon cancer by adjuvant chemotherapy status: a nationwide study in Japan.辅助化疗状态下直肠癌与结肠癌复发风险的比较:日本全国性研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr;56(4):371-381. doi: 10.1007/s00535-021-01771-6. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
10
Sphincter-Saving Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision Provides Better Mesorectal Specimen and Good Oncological Local Control Compared with Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision in Male Patients with Mid-Low Rectal Cancer.保肛机器人全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术相比,可为男性中低位直肠癌患者提供更好的直肠系膜标本和良好的肿瘤局部控制效果。
Surg Technol Int. 2021 May 20;38:160-166. doi: 10.52198/21.STI.38.CR1391.