Department of Educational Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA
University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 10;14(10):e081978. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081978.
is one model for monitoring global outcomes and assessing interventions to improve young people's health equity and well-being while embracing principles of participation and empowerment. Little is known about the use of this approach in practise. This scoping review will identify and synthesise descriptions of how is enacted, to what extent it occurs, and describe the relationship between context and inclusion.
Scoping review methods will adhere to those outlined by Arksey and O'Malley. The study will also follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. The review will use publicly available evaluation reports (grey literature) for programmes funded by the US National Science Foundation through the Advancing Informal science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) Learning programme and whose reports are archived in the repository hosted by the Reimagining Equity and Values in Informal STEM education (REVISE) Center. This scoping review is limited to education, one of the domains of the social determinants of health, more precisely STEM education, due to the report publication parameters set by the REVISE Center repository. A research team member will download citations for and PDFs of reports. These citations and reports will be managed using Zotero and exported to Covidence, a web-based program designed to manage systematic and scoping reviews. Evaluation report selection will occur in a two-step process by trained coders with clear criteria. Inclusion criteria will include: (1) report is for an evaluation study; (2) evaluation has a focus on young people, aged 10-24; (3) evaluation is for a programme serving young people, aged 10-24; and (4) report written and uploaded to the REVISE Center repository between 2017 and 2022. All reports hosted on the REVISE Center repository are based in the USA and written in English. Data charting will also be done by trained coders and facilitated by Covidence and a codebook. Several procedures will be used to uphold rigour and consistency during this process. Data analysis will be done with Dedoose.
Human subjects research approval will not be required. This scoping review will rely on publicly available evaluation reports. No human research participants will be involved in this review. Findings will be shared through dissemination strategies, such as peer-reviewed journals, international and national conferences, and social media affiliated with academic institutions and professional associations.
This study is preregistered on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/23jdx/). Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/K6J98.
是监测全球结果和评估干预措施以改善年轻人健康公平和福祉的一种模式，同时秉承参与和赋权原则。目前对于该方法在实践中的应用知之甚少。本范围界定综述将确定和综合描述 的实施方式、实施程度，并描述背景和包容性之间的关系。
范围界定综述方法将遵循 Arksey 和 O'Malley 所述的方法。该研究还将遵循系统评价和元分析扩展的首选报告项目，以进行范围界定综述。该综述将使用美国国家科学基金会通过推进非正式科学、技术、工程和数学 (STEM) 学习计划资助的计划的公开可用的评估报告（灰色文献），这些报告归档在由重新构想非正式 STEM 教育中的公平和价值观 (REVISE) 中心托管的存储库中。由于 REVISE 中心存储库设置的报告发布参数，本范围界定综述仅限于教育，即健康的社会决定因素领域之一，更具体地说是 STEM 教育。研究团队成员将下载报告的引文和 PDF 格式。这些引文和报告将使用 Zotero 进行管理，并导出到 Covidence，这是一个用于管理系统和范围界定综述的网络程序。评估报告的选择将通过受过培训的编码员按照明确的标准分两步进行。纳入标准包括：(1)报告是评估研究；(2)评估侧重于 10-24 岁的年轻人；(3)评估是针对服务于 10-24 岁年轻人的计划；(4)报告是在 2017 年至 2022 年期间用英语撰写并上传到 REVISE 中心存储库。REVISE 中心存储库上托管的所有报告均基于美国，并且用英语撰写。由受过培训的编码员进行数据图表制作，并由 Covidence 和代码簿协助。在整个过程中，将使用多种程序来维护严谨性和一致性。数据分析将使用 Dedoose 进行。
不需要人类受试者研究批准。本范围界定综述将依赖于公开可用的评估报告。本综述不涉及人类研究参与者。研究结果将通过多种传播策略分享，例如同行评议期刊、国际和全国会议以及与学术机构和专业协会相关的社交媒体。
本研究已在开放科学框架 (https://osf.io/23jdx/) 上预先注册。注册 DOI：https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/K6J98。
