Masterson Daniel, Lindenfalk Bertil, Kjellström Sofia, Robert Glenn, Ockander Marlene
Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
The School of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Oct 10;10(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00638-3.
Analyse reported processes of co-design and co-production in the context of health and social care to explore the underlying mechanisms that enable inclusive and reciprocal engagement.
Peer review research was obtained from a prior scoping review searching eight databases consisting of all methodologies relevant to co-design or co-production in the context of health and social care services and involving service-users.
Articles were included for synthesis if they reported a process of dialogue, with mutuality, insight and clarification in their engagement process. Ninety-three peer-review articles informed our programme theory development.
Data relating to co-design and co-production processes were extracted and analysed through inductive, abductive, and deductive analysis leading to the development of an initial programme theory.
This realist synthesis finds that co-design and co-production can occur at different times, in part or all of the research and participatory process. There is an over reliance on the term 'co-design' or 'co-production' to convey complex engagement or participatory processes. We identified six mechanisms (intention, assets, dialogue, documentation, interpretation and understanding). Interaction between these six identified mechanisms in context, even if only brief, is important for supporting meaningful engagement, alignment and agreement within a co-design or co-production process.
The initial programme theory presented in this article provides clarity by identifying essential mechanisms which can guide the design and implementation of a range of participatory approaches. Rather than relying on a single label to convey complex participatory methods or processes, the values and principles of co-design or co-production, in combination with this programme theory, could be applied to guide implementation and reporting of specific activities within a range of research or participatory methods.
The initial programme theory was presented and piloted in a series of collaborative workshops between May 2023 and March 2024 with patient and public contributors, health professionals and researchers. This engagement process is currently underway to refine the programme theory and it is anticipated that this next phase will be completed in September 2024.
分析在健康与社会护理背景下所报告的共同设计和共同生产过程,以探索实现包容性和相互参与的潜在机制。
同行评审研究来自之前的一项范围界定综述,该综述检索了八个数据库,涵盖了与健康和社会护理服务背景下的共同设计或共同生产相关的所有方法,且涉及服务使用者。
如果文章报告了一个在参与过程中具有相互性、洞察力和澄清作用的对话过程,则纳入进行综合分析。九十三篇同行评审文章为我们的项目理论发展提供了信息。
通过归纳、溯因和演绎分析,提取并分析了与共同设计和共同生产过程相关的数据,从而形成了初步的项目理论。
这项实证综合研究发现,共同设计和共同生产可在研究和参与过程的不同时间、部分或全部阶段发生。人们过度依赖 “共同设计” 或 “共同生产” 这一术语来传达复杂的参与或参与过程。我们确定了六种机制(意图、资产、对话、记录、解释和理解)。这六种已确定机制在具体情境中的相互作用,即使很短暂,对于在共同设计或共同生产过程中支持有意义的参与、协调和达成一致也很重要。
本文提出的初步项目理论通过确定基本机制提供了清晰的指导,这些机制可指导一系列参与式方法的设计和实施。与其依赖单一标签来传达复杂的参与式方法或过程,共同设计或共同生产的价值观和原则,结合该项目理论,可用于指导一系列研究或参与式方法中特定活动的实施和报告。
初步的项目理论在2023年5月至2024年3月期间与患者和公众贡献者、健康专业人员及研究人员举行的一系列协作研讨会上进行了展示和试点。目前正在进行这一参与过程以完善项目理论,预计下一阶段将于2024年9月完成。