Department of Environmental Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, 1, Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Inha University Hospital, 27, Inhang-ro, Jung-gu, Incheon, 22332, Republic of Korea.
Environ Health. 2024 Oct 10;23(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12940-024-01117-8.
The authors conducted meta-analyses regarding the association between cellular and mobile phone use and brain tumor development by applying various radiofrequency-electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) exposure subcategories. With changing patterns of mobile phone use and rapidly developing Wireless Personal Area Network (WPAN) technology (such as Bluetooth), this study will provide insight into the importance of more precise exposure subcategories for RF-EMR.
The medical librarian searched MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library until 16 December 2020.
In these meta-analyses, 19 case-control studies and five cohort studies were included. Ipsilateral users reported a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.40 (95% CI 1.21-1.62) compared to non-regular users. Users with years of use over 10 years reported a pooled OR of 1.27 (95% CI 1.08-1.48). When stratified by each type of brain tumor, only meningioma (OR 1.20 (95% CI 1.04-1.39)), glioma (OR 1.45 (95% CI 1.16-1.82)), and malignant brain tumors (OR 1.93 (95% CI 1.55-2.39)) showed an increased OR with statistical significance for ipsilateral users. For users with years of use over 10 years, only glioma (OR 1.32 (95% CI 1.01-1.71)) showed an increased OR with statistical significance. When 11 studies with an OR with cumulative hours of use over 896 h were synthesized, the pooled OR was 1.59 (95% CI 1.25-2.02). When stratified by each type of brain tumor, glioma, meningioma, and acoustic neuroma reported the pooled OR of 1.66 (95% CI 1.13-2.44), 1.29 (95% CI 1.08-1.54), and 1.84 (95% CI 0.78-4.37), respectively. For each individual study that considered cumulative hours of use, the highest OR for glioma, meningioma, and acoustic neuroma was 2.89 (1.41-5.93) (both side use, > 896 h), 2.57 (1.02-6.44) (both side use, > 896 h), and 3.53 (1.59-7.82) (ipsilateral use, > 1640 h), respectively. For five cohort studies, the pooled risk ratios (RRs) for all CNS tumors, glioma, meningioma, and acoustic neuroma, were statistically equivocal, respectively. However, the point estimates for acoustic neuroma showed a rather increased pooled RR for ever-use (1.26) and over 10 years of use (1.61) compared to never-use, respectively.
In this meta-analysis, as the exposure subcategory used became more concrete, the pooled ORs demonstrated higher values with statistical significance. Although the meta-analysis of cohort studies yielded statistically inconclusive pooled effect estimates, (i) as the number of studies included grows and (ii) as the applied exposure subcategories become more concrete, the pooled RRs could show a different aspect in future research. Additionally, future studies should thoroughly account for changing patterns in mobile phone use and the growing use of earphones or headphones with WPAN technology.
作者通过应用各种射频电磁辐射 (RF-EMR) 暴露子类别,对细胞和手机使用与脑瘤发展之间的关联进行了荟萃分析。随着手机使用模式的变化和无线个人区域网络 (WPAN) 技术(如蓝牙)的快速发展,本研究将深入了解更精确的 RF-EMR 暴露子类别对于该领域的重要性。
医学图书管理员在 MEDLINE(PubMed)、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 中进行了搜索,截至 2020 年 12 月 16 日。
在这些荟萃分析中,纳入了 19 项病例对照研究和 5 项队列研究。与非常规使用者相比,同侧使用者的汇总优势比 (OR) 为 1.40(95%CI 1.21-1.62)。使用年限超过 10 年的使用者的汇总 OR 为 1.27(95%CI 1.08-1.48)。按每种脑瘤类型分层时,只有脑膜瘤(OR 1.20(95%CI 1.04-1.39))、神经胶质瘤(OR 1.45(95%CI 1.16-1.82))和恶性脑瘤(OR 1.93(95%CI 1.55-2.39))同侧使用者的 OR 值具有统计学意义。对于使用年限超过 10 年的使用者,只有神经胶质瘤(OR 1.32(95%CI 1.01-1.71))的 OR 值具有统计学意义。当综合了 11 项具有累积使用时间超过 896 小时的 OR 的研究时,汇总 OR 为 1.59(95%CI 1.25-2.02)。按每种脑瘤类型分层时,神经胶质瘤、脑膜瘤和听神经瘤的汇总 OR 分别为 1.66(95%CI 1.13-2.44)、1.29(95%CI 1.08-1.54)和 1.84(95%CI 0.78-4.37)。对于考虑累积使用时间的每项单独研究,神经胶质瘤、脑膜瘤和听神经瘤的最高 OR 值分别为 2.89(1.41-5.93)(双侧使用,>896 小时)、2.57(1.02-6.44)(双侧使用,>896 小时)和 3.53(1.59-7.82)(同侧使用,>1640 小时)。对于 5 项队列研究,所有中枢神经系统肿瘤、神经胶质瘤、脑膜瘤和听神经瘤的汇总风险比(RR)分别无统计学意义。然而,对于听神经瘤,与从不使用相比,使用过(1.26)和使用超过 10 年(1.61)的点估计值显示出更高的汇总 RR。
在这项荟萃分析中,随着使用的暴露子类别变得更加具体,汇总 OR 值显示出更高的统计学意义。尽管队列研究的荟萃分析产生了无统计学意义的汇总效应估计值,但随着纳入研究数量的增加和应用的暴露子类别变得更加具体,未来的研究可能会显示出不同的汇总 RR。此外,未来的研究应充分考虑手机使用模式的变化和使用带有 WPAN 技术的耳机或耳机的增长。