European Institute for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp, Belgium.
University of Ghent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.
J Int Adv Otol. 2024 Sep 26;20(5):390-396. doi: 10.5152/iao.2024.241576.
The objective of this research was to test whether efficient tinnitus suppression could be achieved by electrical stimulation of the single most basal electrode contact of a cochlear implant. This approach simulates the effects of electrical stimulation using a round-window electrode. The study was performed in 10 adult cochlear implant patients showing complete or almost complete tinnitus suppression during electrical stimulation with their standard fitting-MAP. In all patients, tinnitus appeared again when the implant was switched off. Five Nucleus implant (1 CI532, 4 CI24RE CA) users and 5 Mi12xx series with FLEX28 electrodes with at least 6 months of CI experience were included. Two types of stimulation were presented at the most basal CI contact: a constant pulse train and a modulated pulse train. The variation in pulse rates was low rate (100-300 pps) and high (≥900 pps), and the current level ranged from the C-level to less than the T-level for both stimulation types. The effect of acute electrical stimulation at the most basal electrode contact was compared to the effect obtained with multichannel stimulation with the patient's current fitting MAP. Electrical stimulation was paused between tests with different stimulation types until tinnitus returned to baseline intensity. Patients reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for tinnitus loudness and intrusiveness during normal CI use and for each single contact stimulation type. Eight participants perceived complete suppression with one or more stimulation patterns. In 2 patients, suppression was less efficient than full-band CI stimulation. Louder stimuli are generally perceived as annoying and less effective in reducing tinnitus. In FLEX28 patients, it was also possible to obtain full tinnitus suppression with current amplitudes under the thresholds for auditory perception (this was not tested in patients with the Nucleus device). In 8 of the 10 included patients, we were able to obtain complete or almost complete tinnitus suppression with electrical stimulation at only 1 most basal electrode contact. Therefore, round-window stimulation with a single electrode may be a potential treatment for tinnitus in patients with significant residual hearing. The long-term effects of this therapy should be confirmed in future studies.
本研究旨在测试通过对植入式人工耳蜗单个最基底电极的电刺激能否实现有效的耳鸣抑制。该方法模拟了使用圆窗电极进行电刺激的效果。该研究在 10 名成人植入式人工耳蜗患者中进行,这些患者在使用其标准适配-MAP 进行电刺激时表现出完全或几乎完全的耳鸣抑制。在所有患者中,当植入物关闭时,耳鸣再次出现。纳入了 5 名 Nucleus 植入物(1 名 CI532,4 名 CI24RE CA)使用者和 5 名 Mi12xx 系列带有 FLEX28 电极的患者,他们至少有 6 个月的 CI 经验。在最基底 CI 接触处呈现了两种类型的刺激:恒定脉冲串和调制脉冲串。脉冲率的变化为低速率(100-300pps)和高速率(≥900pps),对于两种刺激类型,电流水平范围从 C 级到低于 T 级。与患者当前适配 MAP 的多通道刺激相比,比较了最基底电极接触处急性电刺激的效果。在不同刺激类型之间的测试之间暂停电刺激,直到耳鸣恢复到基线强度。患者报告了在正常 CI 使用期间和每种单个接触刺激类型下耳鸣响度和侵扰性的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。八名参与者感知到一种或多种刺激模式的完全抑制。在 2 名患者中,抑制效果不如全频带 CI 刺激。更强的刺激通常被感知为烦人,并且在减少耳鸣方面效果较差。在 FLEX28 患者中,也有可能在低于听觉感知阈值的电流幅度下获得完全的耳鸣抑制(这在 Nucleus 设备的患者中未进行测试)。在纳入的 10 名患者中的 8 名,我们仅通过对 1 个最基底电极的电刺激就能获得完全或几乎完全的耳鸣抑制。因此,单个电极的圆窗刺激可能是一种治疗有残余听力的患者耳鸣的潜在方法。这种治疗的长期效果应在未来的研究中得到证实。