Singhal Pragya, Raisingani Deepak, Prasad Ashwini B, Yadav Jyoti, Srivastava Harshit, Kriti Shourya
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Mahatma Gandhi Dental College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Jun;17(6):647-652. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2903.
Evaluation of the effects of different chelating agents on the calcium loss of root canal dentin.
Around 65 single-rooted teeth were collected and decoronated. The working length was determined, and biomechanical preparation was done in a crown-down fashion using the HyFlex Control Memory rotary nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) system until apical preparation of 30.04. Canals were irrigated with chelating agents and sodium hypochlorite between each file insertion. Based on the type of chelating agents used, the samples were randomly divided into five groups ( = 13)-group I, liquid ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); group II, EDTA and chlorhexidine (CHX); group III, etidronic acid; group IV, SmearClear; and group V (control), distilled water. The total volume of the solution used was collected, and calcium ion release was quantified using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The qualitative analysis was done by observing the acetylene (CH)/air flame. Images were obtained for each sample, compared, and analyzed.
With respect to the control group, groups IV and I show a statistically significant difference compared to groups II and III ( < 0.05). Qualitatively, the highest intensity was observed in group IV and the least intensity in group III.
SmearClear showed significantly higher decalcifying capability compared to EDTA, EDTA and CHX, and etidronic acid. Hence, its combined use with an organic solvent can be recommended for efficient smear layer removal.
Minimally invasive endodontic treatment is aimed at preserving the strength of the treated tooth without compromising cleaning effectiveness. Therefore, comparing the efficacy of different chelating agents will be promising with respect to maximum calcium loss both qualitatively and quantitatively.
Singhal P, Raisingani D, Prasad AB, Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of the Effects of Different Chelating Agents on the Calcium Content of Root Canal Dentin Using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer: An Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(6):647-652.
评估不同螯合剂对根管牙本质钙流失的影响。
收集约65颗单根牙并去除冠部。确定工作长度,使用HyFlex Control Memory旋转镍钛(Ni-Ti)系统以冠向下的方式进行生物力学预备,直至根尖预备到30.04。在每次插入锉之间,用螯合剂和次氯酸钠冲洗根管。根据所使用的螯合剂类型,将样本随机分为五组(每组n = 13)——第一组,液体乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA);第二组,EDTA和洗必泰(CHX);第三组,依替膦酸;第四组,SmearClear;第五组(对照组),蒸馏水。收集所用溶液的总体积,使用原子吸收分光光度计对钙离子释放进行定量。通过观察乙炔(CH)/空气火焰进行定性分析。获取每个样本的图像,进行比较和分析。
与对照组相比,第四组和第一组与第二组和第三组相比有统计学显著差异(P < 0.05)。定性方面,第四组观察到的强度最高,第三组最低。
与EDTA、EDTA和CHX以及依替膦酸相比,SmearClear显示出显著更高的脱钙能力。因此,推荐将其与有机溶剂联合使用以有效去除玷污层。
微创牙髓治疗旨在在不影响清洁效果的情况下保留治疗牙齿的强度。因此,定性和定量比较不同螯合剂的功效对于最大程度的钙流失将是有前景的。
Singhal P, Raisingani D, Prasad AB, 使用原子吸收分光光度计对不同螯合剂对根管牙本质钙含量影响的定性和定量评估:一项研究。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2024;17(6):647 - 652。