Gonabal Vijetha, Aggarwal Shipra, Rani Divya, Panwar Mamta
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Jul-Sep;40(3):432-438. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_230_23. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
Hip and proximal femur fractures in any age group require surgical reduction and fixation. Various regional techniques are popular for lower limb surgeries but adequate analgesia from these blocks is variable depending upon the type of surgery. We conducted a study to compare ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment (SFIC) block and pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for postoperative analgesia and cognitive dysfunction in patients undergoing hip and proximal femur surgery.
Sixty-six patients, aged 18-65 years, American Society of Anaesthesiologists I and II undergoing hip and proximal femur surgery were randomized into two groups, group F for SFIC block ( = 33) and group P for PENG block ( = 33). After completion of surgery, an ultrasound-guided SFIC or PENG block was given. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score on movement and rest, muscle power (quadriceps strength), time to first rescue analgesia, total analgesic requirement, and postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the first 24 h were observed.
A total of 66 patients participated in the study and 30 in each group were analyzed. VAS score at movement was significantly lower ( = 0.018) with better quadriceps muscle strength ( = 0.001) in the PENG block compared to the SFIC block group at 24 h postoperatively. Total opioid consumption in morphine equivalents ( = 0.03) was lower in the PENG block than in the SFIC block group for 24 h (28.5% vs. 71.4%). Cognitive impairment was comparable in both groups (3.3% vs. 16.7%, = 0.097).
PENG block is better than SFIC block for postoperative analgesia with lesser opioid consumption, whereas postoperative cognitive dysfunction was comparable in both groups.
任何年龄组的髋部和股骨近端骨折都需要手术复位和固定。各种区域技术在下肢手术中很常用,但这些阻滞的镇痛效果因手术类型而异。我们进行了一项研究,比较超声引导下腹股沟上髂筋膜间隙(SFIC)阻滞和关节周围神经组(PENG)阻滞对髋部和股骨近端手术患者术后镇痛及认知功能障碍的影响。
66例年龄在18 - 65岁、美国麻醉医师协会分级为I级和II级且接受髋部和股骨近端手术的患者被随机分为两组,F组接受SFIC阻滞(n = 33),P组接受PENG阻滞(n = 33)。手术结束后,给予超声引导下的SFIC或PENG阻滞。观察术后24小时内的运动和静息视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、肌肉力量(股四头肌力量)、首次补救镇痛时间、总镇痛需求以及术后认知功能障碍情况。
共有66例患者参与研究,每组各分析30例。术后24小时,与SFIC阻滞组相比,PENG阻滞组的运动时VAS评分显著更低(P = 0.018),股四头肌力量更好(P = 0.001)。PENG阻滞组24小时内吗啡当量的总阿片类药物消耗量更低(P = 0.03)(28.5%对71.4%)。两组的认知障碍情况相当(3.3%对16.7%,P = 0.097)。
PENG阻滞在术后镇痛方面优于SFIC阻滞,阿片类药物消耗量更少,而两组术后认知功能障碍情况相当。