Suppr超能文献

外用羟基频哪酮视黄酸酯 - 肽产品与剥脱性二氧化碳激光治疗面部老化的疗效比较

Efficacy of Topical Hydroxypinacolone Retinoate-Peptide Product Versus Fractional CO Laser in Facial Aging.

作者信息

Kruger Lucas, Bambino Kathryn, Schmalenberg Kristine, Santhanam Uma, Orentreich David, Orentreich Catherine, Logerfo Jodi, Saliou Claude

机构信息

Clinique, New York, New York, USA.

Research and Development, The Estée Lauder Companies, Melville, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025 Jan;24(1):e16621. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16621. Epub 2024 Oct 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many people are interested in addressing visible signs of aging with non-invasive cosmetic treatments. Development of effective topical products will provide options to delay or support cosmetic procedures.

AIMS

This study assessed and compared the efficacy and tolerance of a topical product used over the course of 16 weeks to a single ablative laser treatment on women with moderate global photodamage on the face.

METHODS

Subjects in Cell 1 (Laser Cell) were treated over the entire face with a fractional CO laser system. Subjects in Cell 2 (Topical Serum Cell) were treated with a topical serum containing hydroxypinacolone retinoate and peptides over the entire face, twice per day for 16 weeks. The study was composed of 71 women, with 29 in the Laser Cell (mean age 56.2) and 42 in the Topical Serum Cell (mean age 55.0), between 40 and 65 years old. Expert grading was used to determine efficacy parameters.

RESULTS

Participants in the Topical Serum Cell achieved more significant improvement (p < 0.05) in Marionette lines, fine lines (global face), wrinkles (global face), wrinkles (crow's feet), nasolabial folds, texture, smoothness (tactile), global hyperpigmentation, lift, and photodamage compared to participants in the Laser Cell. Participants in the Topical Serum Cell achieved parity in the look of fine lines (crow's feet), forehead lines, glabella, firmness/bounce (tactile), skin tone evenness, radiance.

CONCLUSIONS

While no statistically significant differences in tolerability were observed, treatment with the topical cosmetic product achieved parity or statistically better improvement in parameters compared to laser treatment at 16 weeks.

摘要

背景

许多人对通过非侵入性美容治疗来解决明显的衰老迹象感兴趣。开发有效的局部用产品将为延缓或辅助美容手术提供选择。

目的

本研究评估并比较了一种局部用产品在16周疗程中与单次剥脱性激光治疗对中度面部整体光损伤女性的疗效和耐受性。

方法

第1组(激光组)的受试者全脸接受分次CO激光系统治疗。第2组(局部血清组)的受试者全脸使用含有羟基频哪酮视黄酸酯和肽的局部血清进行治疗,每天两次,共16周。该研究由71名年龄在40至65岁之间的女性组成,其中激光组29名(平均年龄56.2岁),局部血清组42名(平均年龄55.0岁)。采用专家评分来确定疗效参数。

结果

与激光组的参与者相比,局部血清组的参与者在木偶纹、细纹(全脸)、皱纹(全脸)、鱼尾纹、鼻唇沟、质地、光滑度(触感)、整体色素沉着、提升和光损伤方面有更显著的改善(p < 0.05)。局部血清组的参与者在鱼尾纹、额头纹、眉间纹、紧致度/弹性(触感)、肤色均匀度、光泽度方面的外观表现相当。

结论

虽然在耐受性方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异,但与激光治疗相比,局部美容产品治疗在16周时在参数方面达到了相当或统计学上更好的改善效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5478/11743323/a98347281bc8/JOCD-24-e16621-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验