Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Neuroscience and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, CA, Italy.
Health and Addictions Research Group, IDIBAPS, Addictions Unit. Psychiatry and Psychology Service, ICN, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Pharmacol Res. 2024 Nov;209:107454. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107454. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
Baseline severity of alcohol use disorder (AUD) is an influencing factor in the response to medications recommended for the treatment of AUD. The scarce efficacy of AUD medications partly justifies their limited uses. We were interested in evaluating the efficacy of approved and recommended AUD medications using generic inverse-variance, an analysis facilitating comparison between medications and placebo both at the end of the study and, concomitantly, to baseline values for the same participants. We conducted a systematic review to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any medication to placebo providing, both at baseline and end of treatment, percent heavy drinking days (%HDD), percent drinking days (%DD), and/or drinks per drinking day (DDD). We searched PubMed, Embase, PMC, and three CT registers from inception to April 2023. A total of 79 RCTs (11,737 AUD participants; 30 different medications) were included: 47 RCTs (8465 participants) used AUD medications, and 32 RCTs (3272 participants) used other medications. At baseline, participants consumed on average approximately 12 DDD, and experienced 70 % DD, and 61 % HDD. Placebo halved or reduced these values to a third. Compared to placebo, AUD medications further reduced these outcomes (moderate to high certainty evidence). Other medications reduced the DDD without modifying other alcohol outcomes. AUD medications increased the risk of developing adverse events (high-certainty evidence). Despite the large placebo effects, our results support the benefits of providing AUD medications to people with AUD, helping them reduce alcohol consumption.
基线酒精使用障碍 (AUD) 严重程度是影响推荐用于治疗 AUD 药物反应的一个因素。AUD 药物疗效有限,部分解释了其使用受限的原因。我们有兴趣评估已批准和推荐的 AUD 药物的疗效,使用通用逆方差分析,该分析有助于在研究结束时比较药物与安慰剂,同时也可以比较同一参与者的基线值。我们进行了一项系统评价,纳入了比较任何药物与安慰剂的随机对照试验 (RCT),提供了基线和治疗结束时的重度饮酒天数百分比 (%HDD)、饮酒天数百分比 (%DD) 和/或每饮酒日饮酒量 (DDD)。我们从开始到 2023 年 4 月在 PubMed、Embase、PMC 和三个 CT 登记处进行了搜索。共纳入 79 项 RCT(11737 名 AUD 参与者;30 种不同的药物):47 项 RCT(8465 名参与者)使用 AUD 药物,32 项 RCT(3272 名参与者)使用其他药物。基线时,参与者平均每天饮用约 12 DDD,经历 70%的饮酒日和 61%的重度饮酒日。安慰剂将这些值减半或减少到三分之一。与安慰剂相比,AUD 药物进一步降低了这些结果(中等至高度确定性证据)。其他药物减少了 DDD,但没有改变其他酒精结果。AUD 药物增加了出现不良事件的风险(高确定性证据)。尽管安慰剂效应很大,但我们的结果支持为 AUD 患者提供 AUD 药物的益处,帮助他们减少饮酒量。