• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助化疗后微小残留病灶对晚期卵巢癌行中间减瘤手术患者的预后影响

Prognostic impact of microscopic residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients undergoing interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer.

作者信息

Di Donato Violante, Caruso Giuseppe, Golia D'Augè Tullio, Perniola Giorgia, Palaia Innocenza, Tomao Federica, Muzii Ludovico, Pernazza Angelina, Della Rocca Carlo, Bogani Giorgio, Benedetti Panici Pierluigi, Giannini Andrea

机构信息

Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, University of Rome Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.

Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Feb;311(2):429-436. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07775-w. Epub 2024 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-024-07775-w
PMID:39397086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11890345/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the prognostic impact of microscopic residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients undergoing interval debulking surgery (IDS) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC).

METHODS

Patients affected by FIGO stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer undergoing IDS between October 2010 and April 2016 were selected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 98 patients were identified. Four patients (4.1%) were considered inoperable. Overall, 67 patients (out of 94; 71.3%) had macroscopic disease, equating Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) 1 and 2, 7 (7.4%) had microscopic residuals, equating CRS3, rare CRS2, while 20 (21.3%) had both microscopic and macroscopic disease. Median OS and PFS were, respectively, 44 and 14 months in patients with no macroscopic residual disease (RD = 0) compared to 25 and 6 months, in patients with RD > 0 (OS: p = 0.001; PFS: p = 0.002). The median PFS was 9 months compared to 14 months for patients with more or less than 3 areas of microscopic disease at final pathologic evaluation (p = 0.04). The serum Ca125 dosage after NACT was higher in patients with RD > 0 compared to those without residue (986.31 ± 2240.7 µg/mL vs 215.72 ± 349.5 µg/mL; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Even in the absence of macroscopic disease after NACT, the persistence of microscopic residuals predicts a poorer prognosis among AEOC patients undergoing IDS, with a trend towards worse PFS for patients with more than three affected areas. Removing all fibrotic residuals eventually hiding microscopic disease during IDS represents the key to improving the prognosis of these patients.

摘要

目的

确定新辅助化疗(NACT)后微小残留病灶对接受间歇性肿瘤细胞减灭术(IDS)的晚期上皮性卵巢癌(AEOC)患者的预后影响。

方法

选取2010年10月至2016年4月期间接受IDS的FIGO IIIC-IV期卵巢癌患者。采用Kaplan-Meier分析评估无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。

结果

共确定98例患者。4例(4.1%)被认为无法手术。总体而言,94例中有67例(71.3%)存在肉眼可见病灶,化疗反应评分(CRS)为1和2级,7例(7.4%)有微小残留,CRS为3级,罕见CRS为2级,而20例(21.3%)既有微小病灶又有肉眼可见病灶。无肉眼可见残留病灶(RD = 0)的患者中位OS和PFS分别为44个月和14个月,而RD>0的患者分别为25个月和6个月(OS:p = 0.001;PFS:p = 0.002)。最终病理评估时,微小病灶区域多于或少于3个的患者中位PFS分别为9个月和14个月(p = 0.04)。与无残留的患者相比,RD>0的患者NACT后的血清Ca125剂量更高(986.31±2240.7µg/mL vs 215.72±349.5µg/mL;p = 0.01)。

结论

即使NACT后无肉眼可见病灶,微小残留的存在也预示着接受IDS的AEOC患者预后较差,微小病灶区域超过三个的患者PFS有更差的趋势。在IDS期间清除所有最终隐藏微小病灶的纤维化残留是改善这些患者预后的关键。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e52/11890345/a24c60e09622/404_2024_7775_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e52/11890345/a24c60e09622/404_2024_7775_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e52/11890345/a24c60e09622/404_2024_7775_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic impact of microscopic residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients undergoing interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer.新辅助化疗后微小残留病灶对晚期卵巢癌行中间减瘤手术患者的预后影响
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Feb;311(2):429-436. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07775-w. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
2
Minimal residual disease at primary debulking surgery versus complete tumor resection at interval debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A survival analysis.在晚期上皮性卵巢癌中,初次肿瘤细胞减灭术时的微小残留病灶与间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术时的完全肿瘤切除相比:一项生存分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Apr;157(1):209-213. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
3
[Analysis of factors related to the prognostic benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer].[晚期卵巢癌患者新辅助化疗后行间隔减瘤手术的预后获益相关因素分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jun 25;56(6):385-392. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20201207-00871.
4
Primary debulking surgery versus primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade advanced stage ovarian cancer: comparison of survivals.高级别晚期卵巢癌的初次肿瘤细胞减灭术与初次新辅助化疗:生存比较。
Radiol Oncol. 2018 Sep 11;52(3):307-319. doi: 10.2478/raon-2018-0030.
5
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
6
Primary debulking surgery vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.初次肿瘤细胞减灭术与新辅助化疗后间隔肿瘤细胞减灭术治疗晚期卵巢癌的疗效比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Jan;293(1):163-168. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3813-z. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
7
CT prediction of surgical outcome in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.CT 预测接受新辅助化疗的晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者的手术结果。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Mar;152(3):568-573. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.12.012. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
8
Upfront debulking surgery or delayed surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: Comparison of survival from a noncancer center in India.晚期上皮性卵巢癌新辅助化疗后直接减瘤手术或延迟手术:来自印度一家非癌症中心的生存情况比较
Indian J Cancer. 2024 Jan 1;61(1):68-74. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_1146_20. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
9
A multivariate analysis of the prognostic impact of tumor burden, surgical timing and complexity after complete cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer.晚期卵巢癌完全细胞减灭术后肿瘤负担、手术时机和复杂性的预后影响的多变量分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Sep;158(3):614-621. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.06.495. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
10
Nadir CA-125 serum levels during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and no residual tumor at interval debulking surgery predict prognosis in advanced stage ovarian cancer.新辅助化疗期间 CA-125 血清水平降至最低点且间隔肿瘤减灭术时无残余肿瘤可预测晚期卵巢癌的预后。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug 13;18(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01978-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization of Cuproptosis-Related LncRNAs Prognostic Signature and Identification of LINC02285 as a Novel Biomarker for Ovarian Cancer.铜死亡相关长链非编码RNA预后特征的表征及LINC02285作为卵巢癌新型生物标志物的鉴定
J Inflamm Res. 2025 Jun 8;18:7419-7442. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S521410. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of Intraoperative Blood Transfusions on Survival Rates in Ovarian Cancer Patients.术中输血对卵巢癌患者生存率的影响
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251339248. doi: 10.1177/10732748251339248. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
3
Evaluation of Factors Associated with Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Ovarian cancer management in an ESGO ovarian cancer center of excellence: a systematic case study of the interprofessional and interdisciplinary interaction.ESGO 卓越卵巢癌中心的卵巢癌管理:跨专业和跨学科互动的系统案例研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jun;309(6):2821-2828. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07368-z. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
2
Survival Effect of Maximal Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma During the Platinum Era: A Meta-Analysis.最大程度减瘤术治疗铂类时代晚期卵巢癌的生存效果:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep 1;41(25):4065-4076. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02765.
3
Phase III Trial of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Compared With Cisplatin and Paclitaxel in Patients With Optimally Resected Stage III Ovarian Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.
上皮性卵巢癌手术患者肺部并发症相关因素的评估
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 16;14(4):1314. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041314.
4
Development and validation of a nomogram to predict recurrence in epithelial ovarian cancer using complete blood count and lipid profiles.利用全血细胞计数和血脂谱建立预测上皮性卵巢癌复发的列线图并进行验证。
Front Oncol. 2025 Feb 3;15:1525867. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1525867. eCollection 2025.
卡铂和紫杉醇与顺铂和紫杉醇治疗 III 期卵巢癌患者的 III 期临床试验:一项妇科肿瘤学组研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep 1;41(25):4077-4083. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02766.
4
Validation of the KELIM score as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with advanced high grade serous ovarian cancer.验证 KELIM 评分作为预测晚期高级别浆液性卵巢癌患者新辅助治疗反应的指标。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Dec;167(3):417-422. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.10.014. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
5
Management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a European survey.晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者的管理:一项欧洲调查。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Aug;308(2):535-549. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-06948-3. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
6
Ovarian cancer mutational processes drive site-specific immune evasion.卵巢癌突变过程驱动特定部位的免疫逃逸。
Nature. 2022 Dec;612(7941):778-786. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05496-1. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
7
Identification of Patients With Ovarian Cancer Experiencing the Highest Benefit From Bevacizumab in the First-Line Setting on the Basis of Their Tumor-Intrinsic Chemosensitivity (KELIM): The GOG-0218 Validation Study.基于肿瘤内在化疗敏感性(KELIM)识别一线治疗中贝伐珠单抗获益最高的卵巢癌患者:GOG-0218 验证研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec 1;40(34):3965-3974. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01207. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
8
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Ovarian Cancer, Version 3.2022.NCCN 指南®洞察:卵巢癌,第 3.2022 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Sep;20(9):972-980. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0047.
9
A Phase III Study of Pafolacianine Injection (OTL38) for Intraoperative Imaging of Folate Receptor-Positive Ovarian Cancer (Study 006).帕福拉西尼注射液(OTL38)用于叶酸受体阳性卵巢癌术中成像的III期研究(研究006)。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 10;41(2):276-284. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00291. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
10
Primary or Interval Debulking Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: a Personalized Decision-a Literature Review.原发性或间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术治疗晚期卵巢癌:个体化决策——文献综述。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2022 Dec;24(12):1661-1668. doi: 10.1007/s11912-022-01318-9. Epub 2022 Aug 15.