• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辨别真相与虚假信息:对土耳其数字媒体中不同代人对2023年2月6日地震反应的比较分析

Navigating truth and disinformation: A comparative analysis of generational responses to the 6 February 2023 earthquake in digital media in Türkiye.

作者信息

Bilişli Yasemin, Çakmak Fatma, Zetter Selin Aygen, Ünal Mehmet Ilgaz

机构信息

Department of Office Services and Secretariat, Social Sciences Vocational School, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye.

Fethiye Faculty of Business Administration, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Türkiye.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Sep 27;10(19):e38667. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38667. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38667
PMID:39397969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11471220/
Abstract

This study aims to examine how different generations perceived and responded to news and disinformation about the February 6, 2023 Earthquake in Türkiye, focusing on their trust in news sources and methods of verifying authenticity. In this study, the data were collected from semi-structured interviews held with 30 participants using qualitative methods and they were analyzed with MAXQDA Analytics Pro 2022, through thematic analysis to uncover generational nuances in digital media engagement and trust. The analysis revealed five primary themes: digital media usage habits, trust and reliability in news sources, fake news verification practices, causes of fake news, and views on media legislation. The findings of the study indicated significant generational differences in digital media consumption habits. Notably, maintaining consistent online presence and integrating digital media into everyday life in Generation Z stood out as decisive factors in their reactions to news and disinformation about the February 6, 2023 Earthquake. The study also highlighted varied approaches among generations toward detecting disinformation. While Generation X preferred to use the methods of verification over broadcast media, Generations Y and Z showed a propensity for utilizing digital tools for identifying and verifying fake news. Attitudes toward media legislation differed among generations, yet there was a general consensus on the necessity of such laws to adapt to the digital age's challenges and play a crucial role in combating disinformation. This study offered a detailed comparative analysis on how different generations use digital media and their attitudes toward accuracy of news, particularly in response to significant events such as the February 6, 2023 Earthquake in Türkiye. This study would contribute to adopt a deeper understanding about the critical role of accurate information access during crises and the varying media consumption habits and attitudes toward disinformation across generations. The study emphasized the importance of tailored approaches in media literacy education and disinformation counter-strategies, as well as the need for media laws to be updated in accordance with the demands of the digital era.

摘要

本研究旨在考察不同代际如何看待和应对有关2023年2月6日土耳其地震的新闻和虚假信息,重点关注他们对新闻来源的信任以及核实信息真实性的方法。在本研究中,数据通过定性方法从与30名参与者进行的半结构化访谈中收集,并使用MAXQDA Analytics Pro 2022通过主题分析进行分析,以揭示数字媒体参与和信任方面的代际细微差别。分析揭示了五个主要主题:数字媒体使用习惯、新闻来源的信任和可靠性、假新闻核实做法、假新闻成因以及对媒体立法的看法。研究结果表明,不同代际在数字媒体消费习惯上存在显著差异。值得注意的是,Z世代保持一致的在线形象并将数字媒体融入日常生活,这是他们对2023年2月6日土耳其地震相关新闻和虚假信息做出反应的决定性因素。该研究还强调了不同代际在检测虚假信息方面的不同方法。X世代更喜欢通过广播媒体使用核实方法,而Y世代和Z世代则倾向于利用数字工具来识别和核实假新闻。不同代际对媒体立法的态度有所不同,但对于此类法律适应数字时代挑战并在打击虚假信息方面发挥关键作用的必要性,存在普遍共识。本研究对不同代际如何使用数字媒体以及他们对新闻准确性的态度进行了详细的比较分析,特别是针对2023年2月6日土耳其地震等重大事件。这项研究将有助于更深入地理解危机期间获取准确信息的关键作用,以及不同代际的媒体消费习惯和对虚假信息的态度。该研究强调了在媒体素养教育和虚假信息应对策略中采用量身定制方法的重要性,以及根据数字时代的需求更新媒体法律的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b818/11471220/34cd4cc2156b/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b818/11471220/e0491dd8acde/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b818/11471220/adfb5eee203d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b818/11471220/b3afd18fa316/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b818/11471220/88b1f56f08d2/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b818/11471220/5d1aeed18047/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b818/11471220/8f2f21c98090/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b818/11471220/34cd4cc2156b/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b818/11471220/e0491dd8acde/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b818/11471220/adfb5eee203d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b818/11471220/b3afd18fa316/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b818/11471220/88b1f56f08d2/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b818/11471220/5d1aeed18047/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b818/11471220/8f2f21c98090/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b818/11471220/34cd4cc2156b/gr7.jpg

相似文献

1
Navigating truth and disinformation: A comparative analysis of generational responses to the 6 February 2023 earthquake in digital media in Türkiye.辨别真相与虚假信息:对土耳其数字媒体中不同代人对2023年2月6日地震反应的比较分析
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 27;10(19):e38667. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38667. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
2
Ingraining Polio Vaccine Acceptance through Public Service Advertisements in the Digital Era: The Moderating Role of Misinformation, Disinformation, Fake News, and Religious Fatalism.通过数字时代的公益广告培养脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种意愿:错误信息、虚假信息、假新闻和宗教宿命论的调节作用
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Oct 17;10(10):1733. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10101733.
3
Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.新冠疫情时代的假新闻:进化和心理生物学方面的考虑。
Psychiatriki. 2022 Sep 19;33(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.087. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
4
Decoding the News Media Diet of Disinformation Spreaders.解码虚假信息传播者的新闻媒体“食谱”。
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Mar 19;26(3):270. doi: 10.3390/e26030270.
5
The imaginative dimension of digital disinformation: Fake news, political trolling, and the entwined crises of Covid-19 and inter-Asian racism in a postcolonial city.数字虚假信息的想象维度:假新闻、政治煽动,以及后殖民城市中新冠疫情与亚洲内部种族主义交织的危机
Int J Cult Stud. 2022 Jul;25(3-4):428-444. doi: 10.1177/13678779211068533.
6
Analysis regarding the impact of 'fake news' on the quality of life of the population in a region affected by earthquake activity. The case of Romania-Northern Oltenia.分析“假新闻”对受地震活动影响地区居民生活质量的影响。以罗马尼亚-奥尔特尼亚北部为例。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 1;11:1244564. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1244564. eCollection 2023.
7
A systematic review on fake news research through the lens of news creation and consumption: Research efforts, challenges, and future directions.虚假新闻研究的系统综述:从新闻创作和消费的角度看研究努力、挑战和未来方向。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 9;16(12):e0260080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260080. eCollection 2021.
8
Fake news: Why do we believe it?假新闻:我们为什么会相信它?
Joint Bone Spine. 2022 Jul;89(4):105371. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2022.105371. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
9
Conspiracy beliefs and vaccination intent for COVID-19 in an infodemic.大流行时期的新冠病毒阴谋论信念与疫苗接种意愿
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 12;17(1):e0261559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261559. eCollection 2022.
10
English Text Recognition Deep Learning Framework to Automatically Identify Fake News.英文文本识别深度学习框架,自动识别假新闻。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Apr 28;2022:1493493. doi: 10.1155/2022/1493493. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Fake News through the Eyes of Three Generations of Russians: Differences and Similarities in Social Representations.三代俄罗斯人眼中的假新闻:社会表征中的异同
Psychol Russ. 2022 Mar 30;15(1):83-102. doi: 10.11621/pir.2022.0106. eCollection 2022.
2
Not all world leaders use Twitter in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: impact of the way of Angela Merkel on psychological distress, behaviour and risk perception.并非所有世界领导人都在推特上回应 COVID-19 大流行:安格拉·默克尔的应对方式对心理困扰、行为和风险认知的影响。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2020 Aug 18;42(3):644-646. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa060.
3
The spread of true and false news online.
网络上真实和虚假新闻的传播。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
4
The science of fake news.假新闻的科学。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1094-1096. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2998. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
5
Social media and disasters: a functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research.社交媒体与灾难:社交媒体在灾难规划、应对及研究中的功能框架
Disasters. 2015 Jan;39(1):1-22. doi: 10.1111/disa.12092. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
6
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.定性研究报告的统一标准(COREQ):访谈和焦点小组的32项清单
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14.