• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析“假新闻”对受地震活动影响地区居民生活质量的影响。以罗马尼亚-奥尔特尼亚北部为例。

Analysis regarding the impact of 'fake news' on the quality of life of the population in a region affected by earthquake activity. The case of Romania-Northern Oltenia.

机构信息

Faculty of Education, Law and Public Administration, "Constantin Brâncuși" University of Târgu Jiu, Târgu Jiu, Romania.

Faculty of Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 1;11:1244564. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1244564. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1244564
PMID:38106906
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10722165/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The study aims to examine the impact of the wave of seismic activity in the northern region of Oltenia (Gorj County, Romania) in February 2023 and the belief in 'fake news' (circulated regarding causality, manifestations, and future developments of the seismic activity) on the quality of life of the affected population. It was considered opportune to conduct this study, given the novelty of such a situation, as the mentioned geographical area is not known to have a high seismic risk.

METHODS

The study was built based on the questionnaire to which 975 respondents, present/residing in Gorj County during the earthquakes and at least 14 days after, and with a minimum age of 18 years, responded. The data was collected between February 27, 2023, and March 31, 2023, at a reasonable time interval from the recording of the first seismic event in the region, assuming that the respondents' opinions regarding the negative impact of seismic events on societal life are well crystallized. The aim was to obtain information and analyze it in order to establish the respondents' perception regarding the negative effects of seismic activity and the elements of "fake news" promoted in this context on the quality of life of individuals in the region.

RESULTS

Our study indicates that individuals who are not concerned, due to their disbelief in "fake news" information, about the possibility of new strong earthquakes in the mentioned area feel the best physically, having an average satisfaction level of 82.80 (with a standard deviation of 19.70) on the WHOQOL-BREF scale. On the other hand, those who believed in the fake news experienced the lowest levels of psychological well-being, with an average satisfaction of 60.80 (and a standard deviation of 21.98). The WHOQOL-BREF is an instrument that assesses the quality of life across four distinct domains, and this study emphasizes the importance of accurate and trustworthy information for people's well-being.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study highlight that the quality of life indicators of people in the geographic area affected by the wave of seismic movements are negatively impacted due to the release of "fake news" in the public domain regarding the cause of seismic movements in Gorj county (and the previous earthquakes in Turkey) and their future manifestations and developments (the possibility of high magnitude seismic movements), as well as the lack of information provided by the public authorities on the issue at hand (causes, effects, future manifestations, management measures).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨 2023 年 2 月罗马尼亚戈尔日县(奥尔特尼亚北部地区)地震活动波以及对“假新闻”的信仰(针对地震活动的因果关系、表现形式和未来发展传播)对受灾人群生活质量的影响。鉴于这种情况的新颖性,认为进行这项研究是恰当的,因为该地区众所周知没有高地震风险。

方法

本研究基于问卷调查,共 975 名受访者回答了问卷,他们在地震期间和至少 14 天后居住/居住在戈尔日县,年龄至少为 18 岁。数据收集于 2023 年 2 月 27 日至 2023 年 3 月 31 日之间,与该地区首次地震记录之间有合理的时间间隔,假设受访者对地震事件对社会生活的负面影响的看法已经清晰。目的是获取信息并进行分析,以确定受访者对地震活动的负面影响以及在此背景下宣传的“假新闻”元素对该地区个人生活质量的看法。

结果

我们的研究表明,由于不相信“假新闻”信息,认为该地区不太可能发生新的强烈地震,因此感觉身体状况最好的人,在 WHOQOL-BREF 量表上的平均满意度为 82.80(标准差为 19.70)。另一方面,那些相信假新闻的人经历了最低水平的心理健康,平均满意度为 60.80(标准差为 21.98)。WHOQOL-BREF 是一种评估四个不同领域生活质量的工具,本研究强调了准确和可靠信息对人们福祉的重要性。

结论

研究结果表明,由于在公共领域发布有关戈尔日县(以及土耳其以前的地震)地震运动原因及其未来表现和发展(发生高震级地震运动的可能性)的“假新闻”,以及公共当局对该问题缺乏信息,受地震波影响的地理区域的人们的生活质量指标受到负面影响。

相似文献

1
Analysis regarding the impact of 'fake news' on the quality of life of the population in a region affected by earthquake activity. The case of Romania-Northern Oltenia.分析“假新闻”对受地震活动影响地区居民生活质量的影响。以罗马尼亚-奥尔特尼亚北部为例。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 1;11:1244564. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1244564. eCollection 2023.
2
PTSD, FOMO and fake news beliefs: a cross-sectional study of Wenchuan earthquake survivors.创伤后应激障碍、错失恐惧症和假新闻信仰:汶川地震幸存者的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 9;23(1):2213. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17151-z.
3
Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.新冠疫情时代的假新闻:进化和心理生物学方面的考虑。
Psychiatriki. 2022 Sep 19;33(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.087. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
4
Analysis of Radon Measurements in Relation to Daily Seismic Activity Rates in the Vrancea Region, Romania.罗马尼亚弗伦恰地区氡测量与日地震活动率的关系分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 30;22(11):4160. doi: 10.3390/s22114160.
5
Navigating truth and disinformation: A comparative analysis of generational responses to the 6 February 2023 earthquake in digital media in Türkiye.辨别真相与虚假信息:对土耳其数字媒体中不同代人对2023年2月6日地震反应的比较分析
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 27;10(19):e38667. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38667. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
6
Analysis of the impact of the armed conflict in Ukraine on the population of Romania.分析乌克兰武装冲突对罗马尼亚人口的影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 29;10:964576. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.964576. eCollection 2022.
7
People's perspectives and expectations on preparedness against earthquakes: Tehran case study.人们对地震防备的看法与期望:德黑兰案例研究
J Inj Violence Res. 2010 Jun;2(2):85-91. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v2i2.25.
8
A longitudinal study of quality of life of earthquake survivors in L'Aquila, Italy.意大利拉奎拉地震幸存者生活质量的纵向研究。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 7;13:1143. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1143.
9
Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.地震震动与建筑物损坏:近期关于强烈地面震动的证据引发了对建筑物抗震能力的质疑。
Science. 1975 Aug 22;189(4203):601-8. doi: 10.1126/science.189.4203.601.
10
The Prevalence and Impact of Fake News on COVID-19 Vaccination in Taiwan: Retrospective Study of Digital Media.《台湾地区假新闻对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的流行与影响:数字媒体回溯性研究》
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 26;24(4):e36830. doi: 10.2196/36830.

本文引用的文献

1
Affective Polarization and Misinformation Belief.情感极化与错误信息信念
Polit Behav. 2023 Jan 18:1-60. doi: 10.1007/s11109-022-09851-w.
2
Analysis of the impact of the armed conflict in Ukraine on the population of Romania.分析乌克兰武装冲突对罗马尼亚人口的影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 29;10:964576. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.964576. eCollection 2022.
3
Parental COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy for Children in Romania: National Survey.罗马尼亚父母对儿童接种新冠疫苗的犹豫态度:全国性调查
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Apr 1;10(4):547. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10040547.
4
Fake news: Why do we believe it?假新闻:我们为什么会相信它?
Joint Bone Spine. 2022 Jul;89(4):105371. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2022.105371. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
5
Fake news and COVID-19: modelling the predictors of fake news sharing among social media users.假新闻与新冠疫情:社交媒体用户间假新闻分享预测因素的建模分析
Telemat Inform. 2021 Jan;56:101475. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101475. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
6
Interdisciplinary Lessons Learned While Researching Fake News.研究假新闻过程中的跨学科经验教训。
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 16;11:537612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.537612. eCollection 2020.
7
The Limitations of Online Surveys.在线调查的局限性。
Indian J Psychol Med. 2020 Oct 13;42(6):575-576. doi: 10.1177/0253717620957496. eCollection 2020 Nov.
8
Social cohesion and quality of life among survivors of a natural disaster.自然灾害幸存者的社会凝聚力和生活质量。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Dec;29(12):3191-3200. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02590-7. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
9
Conducting Online Surveys.在线调查。
J Hum Lact. 2019 Aug;35(3):413-417. doi: 10.1177/0890334419848734. Epub 2019 May 14.
10
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook.远低于你的想象:脸书上虚假新闻传播的流行程度和预测因素。
Sci Adv. 2019 Jan 9;5(1):eaau4586. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4586. eCollection 2019 Jan.