Zhu Hong-Mei, Wang Shi-Yi
Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University of Chinese Medicine Ningbo 315000, Zhejiang, China.
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Sep 15;16(9):4268-4278. doi: 10.62347/UJUB4891. eCollection 2024.
To systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnifying endoscopy combined with narrowband imaging (ME-NBI) in detecting early gastric cancer (EGC) and to provide a scientific basis for its clinical utility.
Literature published before May 2024 that utilized ME-NBI for diagnosing EGC was searched across PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and major Chinese databases. Included studies were cohort studies or randomized controlled trials, and their quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 framework. Meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 17 software to calculate diagnostic indicators such as sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Heterogeneity was explored through Spearman's correlation coefficient, I statistics, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression analysis. Publication bias was assessed with Deeks' funnel plot.
Twenty studies involving 7,770 patients and 7,917 lesions were included. The pooled sensitivity of ME-NBI for diagnosing EGC was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.90), specificity was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.96), and the AUC was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96), demonstrating high diagnostic accuracy. Subgroup analysis revealed lower sensitivity in multicenter studies. Excised samples had similar sensitivity to biopsy samples but differed in specificity. Publication bias was detected (P=0.01), but sensitivity analysis corrected for this, maintaining high combined sensitivity, specificity, and AUC.
ME-NBI is a highly accurate and reliable diagnostic tool for EGC. Despite have some bias and heterogeneity, this was effectively addressed through sensitivity and subgroup analyses. ME-NBI should be considered a preferred method for EGC screening and diagnosis in clinical practice.
系统评价放大内镜联合窄带成像(ME-NBI)检测早期胃癌(EGC)的诊断准确性,为其临床应用提供科学依据。
检索2024年5月前发表在PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science及中国主要数据库中利用ME-NBI诊断EGC的文献。纳入的研究为队列研究或随机对照试验,采用QUADAS-2框架评估其质量。使用Stata 17软件进行荟萃分析,计算敏感度、特异度和曲线下面积(AUC)等诊断指标。通过Spearman相关系数、I统计量、亚组分析和Meta回归分析探讨异质性。用Deeks漏斗图评估发表偏倚。
纳入20项研究,涉及7770例患者和7917个病灶。ME-NBI诊断EGC的合并敏感度为0.86(95%CI:0.80-0.90),特异度为0.92(95%CI:0.86-0.96),AUC为0.94(95%CI:0.91-0.96),显示出较高的诊断准确性。亚组分析显示多中心研究中的敏感度较低。切除样本与活检样本的敏感度相似,但特异度不同。检测到发表偏倚(P=0.01),但通过敏感度分析对此进行了校正,合并敏感度、特异度和AUC仍保持较高水平。
ME-NBI是一种用于EGC的高度准确且可靠的诊断工具。尽管存在一些偏倚和异质性,但通过敏感度和亚组分析有效解决了这些问题。在临床实践中,ME-NBI应被视为EGC筛查和诊断的首选方法。