Hagiyama Akikazu, Yamamoto Norio, Watanabe Jun, Tsuge Takahiro, Nakashima Yuki, Nakao Shuri, Sato Hiroki, Yorifuji Takashi
Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, JPN.
Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, JPN.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 11;16(9):e69212. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69212. eCollection 2024 Sep.
This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of protein and/or essential amino acid (EAA) supplementation in all lower limb surgeries using systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We included RCTs that assessed the efficacy of protein and/or EAA supplementation in lower limb surgeries. On June 2, 2023, we searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The primary outcomes were mobility, patient-reported outcomes (PRO), and acute kidney injury (AKI). The secondary outcomes were exercise capacity, muscle strength, muscle mass, and all adverse events. We performed meta-analyses using the random-effects model. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We included 12 RCTs (622 patients). These studies included four on hip fracture surgery, three on total hip arthroplasty, and five on total knee arthroplasty. Protein and/or EAA supplementation may slightly improve PRO (standard mean difference 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22 to 0.80, low certainty of evidence). Nevertheless, it may not improve mobility (mean difference 0.07 m/s, 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.16, low certainty of evidence). No adverse events including AKI were reported. Muscle strength may have increased (standard mean difference 0.31, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.61, very low certainty of evidence). However, exercise capacity (mean difference 5.43 m, 95% CI: -35.59 to 46.45, very low certainty of evidence) and muscle mass (standard mean difference -0.08, 95% CI: -0.49 to 0.33, very low certainty of evidence) were not improved. While protein and/or EAA supplementation in lower limb surgeries may improve PRO, it is unlikely to affect mobility. Despite this, the medical team and patients might still consider protein and/or EAA supplementation a useful option.
本研究旨在通过对随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价和荟萃分析,考察蛋白质和/或必需氨基酸(EAA)补充剂在所有下肢手术中的疗效和安全性。我们纳入了评估蛋白质和/或EAA补充剂在下肢手术中疗效的RCT。2023年6月2日,我们检索了EMBASE、MEDLINE、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台和ClinicalTrials.gov。主要结局为活动能力、患者报告结局(PRO)和急性肾损伤(AKI)。次要结局为运动能力、肌肉力量、肌肉质量和所有不良事件。我们使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险,并使用推荐分级、评估、制定和评价方法评估证据的确定性。我们纳入了12项RCT(622例患者)。这些研究包括4项关于髋部骨折手术的研究、3项关于全髋关节置换术的研究和5项关于全膝关节置换术的研究。蛋白质和/或EAA补充剂可能会略微改善PRO(标准均差0.51,95%置信区间(CI):0.22至0.80,证据确定性低)。然而,它可能不会改善活动能力(均差0.07 m/s,95% CI:-0.01至0.16,证据确定性低)。未报告包括AKI在内的不良事件。肌肉力量可能有所增加(标准均差0.31,95% CI:0.02至0.61,证据确定性非常低)。然而,运动能力(均差5.43 m,95% CI:-35.59至46.45,证据确定性非常低)和肌肉质量(标准均差-0.08,95% CI:-0.49至0.33,证据确定性非常低)并未得到改善。虽然下肢手术中补充蛋白质和/或EAA可能会改善PRO,但不太可能影响活动能力。尽管如此,医疗团队和患者仍可能认为补充蛋白质和/或EAA是一个有用的选择。