• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统性硬化症的自我报告皮肤严重程度和生活质量:PASTUL的多中心验证

Self-reported skin severity and quality of life in systemic sclerosis: multicentre validation of PASTUL.

作者信息

Spierings Julia, Welsing Paco M J, Colak Seda, Quah Helen, Del Galdo Francesco, Herrick Ariane L, Hughes Michael, Pauling John D, Ong Voon H, Denton Christopher P

机构信息

Centre for Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Diseases, UCL Medical School Royal Free Campus, London, UK.

Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 May 1;64(5):2802-2809. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae561.

DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keae561
PMID:39400748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12048044/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to validate the Patient self-Assessment of Skin Thickness in Upper Limb (PASTUL) questionnaire in SSc and assess impact of skin involvement on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

METHODS

Participants were included in four UK centres. PASTUL specifies a grading of skin at eight sites corresponding to the modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Construct validity was assessed by comparing PASTUL scores with mRSS. HRQoL was evaluated with EuroQoL 5 dimension 5 levels (EQ5D5L) and Leeds SSc QoL questionnaires. Additionally, correlation between PASTUL and Scleroderma Skin Patient-Reported Outcome (SSPRO) was explored. Follow-up was 12 months.

RESULTS

In total, 196 participants were included, mean age was 56.4 years (s.d. 13.9), 80.6% female (n = 158), mean disease duration 11.9 years (s.d. 9.9), 110 (56.1%) had lcSSc and 81 (41.3%) dcSSc. PASTUL and upper limb mRSS were well correlated at baseline, 6 and 12 months [intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) = 0.67, 0.78 and 0.62, P < 0.001]. Test-retest reliability was good (ICC = 0.83, P < 0.001). There was a stronger correlation between PASTUL and upper limb mRSS in dcSSc compared with lcSSc (0.69 vs 0.51, P < 0.001). In participants with early disease (<4 years) PASTUL was moderately correlated with HRQoL (r = 0.53, P < 0.001); correlations were weaker in the whole group. Mean time to do the PASTUL self-assessment was 5.0 min (s.d. 3.7).

CONCLUSION

PASTUL is a feasible outcome tool that adds to assessments such as SSPRO. Skin thickening is correlated with HRQoL, particularly in early disease.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证上肢皮肤厚度患者自我评估(PASTUL)问卷在系统性硬化症(SSc)中的有效性,并评估皮肤受累对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响。

方法

参与者纳入英国的四个中心。PASTUL对与改良罗德南皮肤评分(mRSS)相对应的八个部位的皮肤进行分级。通过比较PASTUL评分与mRSS来评估结构效度。使用欧洲五维健康量表(EQ5D5L)和利兹SSc生活质量问卷评估HRQoL。此外,还探讨了PASTUL与硬皮病皮肤患者报告结局(SSPRO)之间的相关性。随访时间为12个月。

结果

总共纳入196名参与者,平均年龄为56.4岁(标准差13.9),80.6%为女性(n = 158),平均病程11.9年(标准差9.9),110名(56.1%)患有局限性皮肤型系统性硬化症(lcSSc),81名(41.3%)患有弥漫性皮肤型系统性硬化症(dcSSc)。PASTUL与上肢mRSS在基线、6个月和12个月时相关性良好[组内相关系数(ICC)分别为0.67、0.78和0.62,P < 0.001]。重测信度良好(ICC = 0.83,P < 0.001)。与lcSSc相比,dcSSc中PASTUL与上肢mRSS的相关性更强(0.69对0.51,P < 0.001)。在疾病早期(<4年)的参与者中,PASTUL与HRQoL中度相关(r = 0.53,P < 0.001);在整个组中相关性较弱。完成PASTUL自我评估的平均时间为5.0分钟(标准差3.7)。

结论

PASTUL是一种可行的结局工具,可补充SSPRO等评估。皮肤增厚与HRQoL相关,尤其是在疾病早期。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d039/12048044/4d1108ef13be/keae561f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d039/12048044/4d1108ef13be/keae561f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d039/12048044/4d1108ef13be/keae561f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Self-reported skin severity and quality of life in systemic sclerosis: multicentre validation of PASTUL.系统性硬化症的自我报告皮肤严重程度和生活质量:PASTUL的多中心验证
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 May 1;64(5):2802-2809. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae561.
2
Psychometric Evaluation of the Scleroderma Skin Questionnaire: A Novel Patient-Reported Outcome for Skin Disease in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis.硬皮病皮肤问卷的心理测量学评估:系统性硬化症患者皮肤疾病一种新的患者报告结局
J Rheumatol. 2025 Mar 1;52(3):263-269. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-0736.
3
Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome instrument for skin involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis.开发和验证一种用于系统性硬化症患者皮肤受累的患者报告结局量表。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Aug;76(8):1374-1380. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210534. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
4
Validity, reliability, and feasibility of durometer measurements of scleroderma skin disease in a multicenter treatment trial.在一项多中心治疗试验中,硬度计测量硬皮病皮肤疾病的有效性、可靠性和可行性。
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 May 15;59(5):699-705. doi: 10.1002/art.23564.
5
Minimal Clinically Important Differences for the Modified Rodnan Skin Score: Results from the Scleroderma Lung Studies (SLS-I and SLS-II).改良 Rodnan 皮肤评分的最小临床重要差异:硬皮病肺研究(SLS-I 和 SLS-II)的结果。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Jan 16;21(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1809-y.
6
Self-assessment of skin tightness severity by scleroderma patients.硬皮病患者对皮肤紧绷严重程度的自我评估。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2016 Oct;19(10):989-995. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12879. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
7
Changes in disability and their relationship with skin thickening, in diffuse and limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a retrospective cohort study.弥漫性和局限性皮肤系统性硬化症患者残疾变化及其与皮肤增厚的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
Scand J Rheumatol. 2019 May;48(3):230-234. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2018.1523455. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
8
Evaluation of Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium training recommendations on modified Rodnan skin score assessment in scleroderma.评估硬皮病临床试验联合会关于硬皮病改良 Rodnan 皮肤评分评估的培训建议。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2019 Jun;22(6):1036-1040. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13523. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
9
High-throughput quantitative histology in systemic sclerosis skin disease using computer vision.基于计算机视觉的系统性硬化症皮肤疾病高通量定量组织学。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Mar 14;22(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-2127-0.
10
Performance of the EULAR Systemic sclerosis Impact of Disease (ScleroID) questionnaire as a patient-reported outcome measure for patients with diffuse systemic sclerosis.EULAR 系统性硬化症疾病影响(ScleroID)问卷作为弥漫性系统性硬化症患者的患者报告结局测量工具的性能。
RMD Open. 2024 Nov 27;10(4):e004653. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004653.

本文引用的文献

1
Teleconsultation in rheumatology: A literature review and opinion paper.风湿病远程会诊:文献综述与观点论文
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2023 Dec;63:152271. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152271. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
2
Impact of Covid-19 on clinical care and lived experience of systemic sclerosis: An international survey from EURORDIS-Rare Diseases Europe.新冠疫情对系统性硬化症临床护理及生活体验的影响:来自欧洲罕见病组织(EURORDIS)的一项国际调查
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2021 Jun;6(2):133-138. doi: 10.1177/2397198321999927. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
3
A randomised, open-label trial to assess the optimal treatment strategy in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: the UPSIDE study protocol.
一项评估早期弥漫性皮肤系统性硬化症最佳治疗策略的随机、开放标签试验:UPSIDE 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 18;11(3):e044483. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044483.
4
PASTUL questionnaire: a tool for self-assessment of scleroderma skin during the COVID-19 pandemic.PASTUL问卷:一种在新冠疫情期间用于系统性硬化症皮肤自我评估的工具。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jun;80(6):819-820. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219775. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
5
Disease progression in systemic sclerosis.系统性硬化症的疾病进展
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Mar 2;60(3):1565-1567. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa911.
6
How COVID-19 is changing rheumatology clinical practice.新冠疫情如何改变风湿病学临床实践。
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021 Jan;17(1):11-15. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-00527-5. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
7
Changes in disability and their relationship with skin thickening, in diffuse and limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a retrospective cohort study.弥漫性和局限性皮肤系统性硬化症患者残疾变化及其与皮肤增厚的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
Scand J Rheumatol. 2019 May;48(3):230-234. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2018.1523455. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
8
Patient acceptable symptom state and minimal clinically important difference for patient-reported outcomes in systemic sclerosis: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing personalized physical therapy to usual care.患者可接受的症状状态和最小临床重要差异的患者报告结局在系统性硬化症:一项比较个体化物理治疗与常规护理的随机对照试验的二次分析。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Feb;48(4):694-700. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
9
Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation.相关系数:合理使用与解释。
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864.
10
Common measure of quality of life for people with systemic sclerosis across seven European countries: a cross-sectional study.跨七个欧洲国家的系统性硬化症患者生活质量的常用衡量标准:一项横断面研究。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Jul;77(7):1032-1038. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212412. Epub 2018 Feb 20.