Fisher Adam M, McKenzie Amelia-Rose V, Price Tom A R, Bonsall Michael B, Knell Robert J
School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences Queen Mary University of London London UK.
School of Natural Sciences University of Hull Hull UK.
Evol Appl. 2024 Oct 14;17(10):e70003. doi: 10.1111/eva.70003. eCollection 2024 Oct.
We are still largely reliant on pesticides for the suppression of arthropod pests which threaten human health and food production, but the recent rise of evolved resistance among important pest species has reduced pesticide efficacy. Despite this, our understanding of strategies that effectively limit the evolution of resistance remains weak. Male-killing sex ratio distorting microbes (SRDMs), such as and , are common among arthropod species. Previous theoretical work has suggested that they could limit adaptive potential in two ways: first, because by distorting sex ratios they reduce the effective population size, and second, because infected females produce no male offspring which restricts gene flow. Here we present the results of a novel experiment in which we test the extent by which these two mechanisms limit the adaptive response of arthropods to pesticide. Using a fully factorial design, we manipulated the adult sex ratio of laboratory populations of , both in the presence and absence of SRDMs, and exposed these populations to six generations of pesticide poisoning. This design allows the effects of SRDMs on sex ratio and their effects on gene flow to be estimated separately. After six generations, individuals from populations with even sex ratios displayed a higher resistance to pesticide relative to individuals from female-biased populations. By contrast, we found no effect of the presence of SRDMs in host populations on pesticide resistance independent of sex ratio. In addition, males were more susceptible to pesticide than females-this was true of flies from both naïve and previously exposed populations. These findings provide the first empirical proof of concept that sex ratio distortion arising from SRDMs can limit adaptation to pesticides, but cast doubt on the theoretical effect of male-killers limiting adaptation by disrupting gene flow.
我们在很大程度上仍依赖农药来抑制威胁人类健康和粮食生产的节肢动物害虫,但最近重要害虫物种中进化出的抗性增加,降低了农药的效力。尽管如此,我们对有效限制抗性进化策略的理解仍然薄弱。雄性致死性性别比例扭曲微生物(SRDMs),如[具体微生物名称1]和[具体微生物名称2],在节肢动物物种中很常见。先前的理论研究表明,它们可以通过两种方式限制适应潜力:第一,由于它们扭曲性别比例,从而减小了有效种群大小;第二,因为受感染的雌性不产生雄性后代,这限制了基因流动。在此,我们展示了一项新实验的结果,在该实验中我们测试了这两种机制在多大程度上限制了节肢动物对农药的适应性反应。使用完全析因设计,我们在有和没有SRDMs的情况下,操纵了[具体节肢动物名称]实验室种群的成体性别比例,并使这些种群接受六代农药中毒处理。这种设计允许分别估计SRDMs对性别比例的影响及其对基因流动的影响。六代之后,与来自雌性偏多种群的个体相比,性别比例均衡种群的个体对农药表现出更高的抗性。相比之下,我们发现宿主种群中SRDMs的存在对与性别比例无关的农药抗性没有影响。此外,雄性比雌性对农药更敏感——无论是来自未接触过农药的种群还是先前接触过农药的种群的果蝇都是如此。这些发现首次提供了概念验证的实证证据,即SRDMs引起的性别比例扭曲可以限制对农药的适应性,但对雄性致死剂通过破坏基因流动来限制适应性的理论效果提出了质疑。