SEP Key Laboratory of Eco-Industry, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110819, People's Republic of China.
Engineering Research Center of Frontier Technologies for Low-Carbon Steelmaking (Ministry of Education), Shenyang, Liaoning, 110819, People's Republic of China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Nov;31(51):60749-60777. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-35136-2. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
To meet the carbon-neutral goal in 2050, an accelerated transition of decarbonization is needed in the iron and steel industry. Lots of decarbonization path models are recently being used to analyze the technology pathways, industrial structure adjustments, and short- or long-term policies for greenhouse gas emission reduction. Thus, systematic insight is required for better making sense of the status quo and differences in low-carbon transition pathways at different levels. This paper reviews the carbon emission reduction of steel production routes and summarizes the decarbonization models from micro-, meso-, and macro-level perspectives, respectively. First, we systematically analyze the capacity and potential of both available and emerging technologies in the iron and steel production process. Additionally, we conduct a theoretical analysis of the bottom-up models currently used as effective tools to assess decarbonization technology pathways. Subsequently, pathways and models in terms of industrial synergy are elaborated. Policy guidance and market support are explored to overcome the challenges of collaborative carbon reduction faced by global steel producers. The characteristics of top-down models for supporting carbon reduction are also discussed. Finally, gaps in the literature and future research agendas are identified. Advancing this research could enrich discussions on steel industry decarbonization and provide clearer assessments of modeling approaches. The results indicate that existing energy-saving technologies in the iron and steel industry have limited carbon reduction capacity. Significant reduction requires coordinated efforts with upstream and downstream industries, particularly in hydrogen and power sectors, along with financial support and favorable policies.
为了实现 2050 年的碳中和目标,钢铁行业需要加速脱碳转型。最近,许多脱碳路径模型被用于分析技术途径、产业结构调整以及温室气体减排的短期和长期政策。因此,需要系统的洞察力来更好地理解低碳转型路径在不同层面的现状和差异。本文综述了钢铁生产路线的碳减排,并分别从微观、中观和宏观层面总结了脱碳模型。首先,我们系统地分析了钢铁生产过程中现有和新兴技术的产能和潜力。此外,我们对目前用作评估脱碳技术途径的有效工具的自下而上模型进行了理论分析。随后,阐述了工业协同的途径和模型。探讨了政策指导和市场支持,以克服全球钢铁生产商在协同减碳方面面临的挑战。还讨论了支持碳减排的自上而下模型的特点。最后,确定了文献中的差距和未来的研究议程。推进这一研究可以丰富钢铁行业脱碳的讨论,并提供对建模方法的更清晰评估。研究结果表明,钢铁行业现有的节能技术的碳减排能力有限。需要与上下游产业协调努力,特别是在氢能和电力领域,同时需要财政支持和有利的政策。