Gomez Gomez Silvia, Segura Mata Julián C, Alcalá Nalváiz José T, García-Álvarez García Felicito, Marín Zaldívar Clara, Fernández de Gamarra Goiricelaya Amagoia
Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Lower Limb Unit, MAZ Hospital, 50015 Zaragoza, Spain.
Department of Surgery, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 25;13(19):5706. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195706.
The aim of this study is to analyse the efficacy of using a combined infiltration between a popliteal artery and knee cap (IPACK) anaesthetic block and a selective saphenous nerve block compared to local infiltration with anaesthetic in knee replacement surgery. A retrospective observational study was conducted. A total of 312 patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty in our hospital between January 2019 and December 2022 were reviewed. Local intra-articular anaesthesia was used in 207 patients and combined nerve block in 105 patients (IPACK group). The mean age in the LIA group was 72.9 years and 70.4 years in the IPACK group. There were 44% men in the LIA group and 53.3% in the IPACK group. The primary outcome was the presence of poorly controlled pain requiring rescue opioid analgesia in the postoperative period. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, range of motion and length of hospital stay. There were no significant differences in the age or gender distribution of patients between the two groups. One patient treated with anaesthetic blocks required rescue analgesia with opioids, while in the LIA group this occurred in 28.5% of cases. There were statistically significant higher VAS scores in the LIA group ( < 0.001). Range of motion was slightly greater in the block group (4.6°, < 0.05). There were significant differences in hospital stay (2.4 days in the blocks group and 2.8 days in the LIA group ( < 0.05). In our series, patients treated with anaesthetic blocks showed better results with similar postoperative pain control. However, further studies are needed.
本研究的目的是分析在膝关节置换手术中,与单纯局部麻醉浸润相比,腘动脉与髌骨之间联合浸润麻醉(IPACK)和选择性隐神经阻滞麻醉的效果。进行了一项回顾性观察研究。回顾了2019年1月至2022年12月期间在我院接受初次全膝关节置换术的312例患者。207例患者采用局部关节内麻醉,105例患者采用联合神经阻滞(IPACK组)。局部浸润麻醉组的平均年龄为72.9岁,IPACK组为70.4岁。局部浸润麻醉组男性占44%,IPACK组男性占53.3%。主要结局是术后疼痛控制不佳需要使用补救性阿片类镇痛药物。次要结局包括疼痛评分、活动范围和住院时间。两组患者的年龄和性别分布无显著差异。接受麻醉阻滞治疗的患者中有1例需要使用阿片类药物进行补救性镇痛,而在局部浸润麻醉组中,这一比例为28.5%。局部浸润麻醉组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)在统计学上显著更高(<0.001)。阻滞组的活动范围略大(4.6°,<0.05)。住院时间存在显著差异(阻滞组为2.4天,局部浸润麻醉组为2.8天,<0.05)。在我们的系列研究中,接受麻醉阻滞治疗的患者在术后疼痛控制相似的情况下显示出更好的效果。然而,还需要进一步的研究。