• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症评分困境：平衡精准性与实用性

The Sepsis Score Dilemma: Balancing Precision and Utility.

作者信息

Pande Rajesh, Pandey Maitree

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, BLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Oct;28(10):906-907. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24814. Epub 2024 Sep 30.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24814
PMID:39411295
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11471979/
Abstract

Pande R, Pandey M. The Sepsis Score Dilemma: Balancing Precision and Utility. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(10):906-907.

摘要

潘德R，潘迪M。脓毒症评分困境：平衡精准度与实用性。《印度重症监护医学杂志》2024年；28(10)：906 - 907。

相似文献

1
The Sepsis Score Dilemma: Balancing Precision and Utility.脓毒症评分困境：平衡精准性与实用性
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Oct;28(10):906-907. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24814. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
Developing Augmented Pro-SOFA and Pro-SAPS Models by Integrating Biomarkers PCT, NLR, and CRP with SOFA and SAPS-III Scores.通过整合生物标志物降钙素原（PCT）、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值（NLR）和C反应蛋白（CRP）与序贯器官衰竭评估（SOFA）及简化急性生理学评分III（SAPS-III）来开发增强型SOFA和SAPS模型。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Oct;28(10):935-941. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24807. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
3
Serum Procalcitonin vs SOFA Score in Predicting Outcome in Sepsis Patients in Medical Intensive Care Unit.在医学重症监护病房中，血清降钙素原与序贯器官衰竭评估评分对脓毒症患者预后的预测作用比较
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023 May;27(5):348-351. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24462.
4
Comparison of Trends of Procalcitonin and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients of Sepsis in Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房脓毒症患者降钙素原与中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值变化趋势的比较
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Oct;28(10):942-951. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24804. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
5
Serial Trend of Neutrophil CD64, C-reactive Protein, and Procalcitonin as a Prognostic Marker in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis/Septic Shock: A Prospective Observational Study from a Tertiary Care ICU.中性粒细胞CD64、C反应蛋白和降钙素原作为脓毒症/脓毒性休克重症患者预后标志物的连续变化趋势：一项来自三级医疗重症监护病房的前瞻性观察研究
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Aug;28(8):777-784. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24777. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
6
Diagnostic Potential of Serum Interleukin-6 in Predicting Bacteremia in Adult Patients with Sepsis: A Prospective Observational Study.血清白细胞介素-6在预测成年脓毒症患者菌血症中的诊断潜力：一项前瞻性观察研究
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Jul;28(7):637-644. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24754.
7
Comparison of PIRO, APACHE IV, and SOFA Scores in Predicting Outcome in Patients with Sepsis Admitted to Intensive Care Unit: A Two-year Cross-sectional Study at Rural Teaching Hospital.脓毒症患者入住重症监护病房时PIRO、APACHE IV和SOFA评分对预后预测的比较：农村教学医院的一项为期两年的横断面研究
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Oct;26(10):1099-1105. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24323.
8
An Evaluation of Serum Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein Levels as Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers of Severe Sepsis.血清降钙素原和C反应蛋白水平作为严重脓毒症诊断和预后生物标志物的评估
J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2015 Nov 10;1(4):147-153. doi: 10.1515/jccm-2015-0022. eCollection 2015 Oct.
9
[Comparison of four scoring systems for predicting ICU mortality in patients with sepsis].[四种预测脓毒症患者重症监护病房死亡率评分系统的比较]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2020 Apr 30;40(4):513-518. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2020.04.10.
10
Synergizing Survival: Uniting Acute Gastrointestinal Injury Grade and Disease Severity Scores in Critical Care Prognostication.协同生存：在重症监护预后中整合急性胃肠损伤分级与疾病严重程度评分
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Jun;28(6):529-530. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24735.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive performance of NEWS and qSOFA in immunocompromised sepsis patients at the emergency department.免疫抑制脓毒症患者在急诊科应用 NEWS 和 qSOFA 的预测性能。
Infection. 2024 Oct;52(5):1863-1873. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02247-4. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
2
Sepsis Prediction Model for Determining Sepsis vs SIRS, qSOFA, and SOFA.用于区分脓毒症与全身炎症反应综合征（qSOFA 和 SOFA）的脓毒症预测模型。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2329729. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29729.
3
Intensive Care in India in 2018-2019: The Second Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study.2018 - 2019年印度的重症监护：第二项印度重症监护病例组合与实践模式研究
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Oct;25(10):1093-1107. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23965.
4
A comparison of different scores for diagnosis and mortality prediction of adults with sepsis in Low-and-Middlencome Countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.低收入和中等收入国家成人脓毒症诊断及死亡率预测不同评分的比较：一项系统评价与荟萃分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Oct 30;42:101184. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101184. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Artificial intelligence in sepsis early prediction and diagnosis using unstructured data in healthcare.人工智能在使用医疗保健中的非结构化数据进行脓毒症早期预测和诊断中的应用。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 29;12(1):711. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-20910-4.
6
Biomarker combination and SOFA score for the prediction of mortality in sepsis and septic shock: A prospective observational study according to the Sepsis-3 definitions.生物标志物组合与序贯器官衰竭评估（SOFA）评分对脓毒症和脓毒性休克死亡率的预测：一项根据脓毒症-3定义进行的前瞻性观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May 29;99(22):e20495. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020495.
7
Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、地区和国家脓毒症发病率和死亡率，1990-2017 年：全球疾病负担研究分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7.
8
Development and validation of a novel predictive score for sepsis risk among trauma patients.开发并验证一种新的创伤患者脓毒症风险预测评分。
World J Emerg Surg. 2019 Mar 12;14:11. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0231-8. eCollection 2019.
9
Comparison of severity score models based on different sepsis definitions to predict in-hospital mortality among sepsis patients in the Intensive Care Unit.比较基于不同脓毒症定义的严重程度评分模型，以预测 ICU 脓毒症患者的住院死亡率。
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2020 May;44(4):226-232. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
10
Comparison of Prognostic Accuracy of the quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment between Short- & Long-term Mortality in Patients Presenting Outside of the Intensive Care Unit - A Systematic Review & Meta-analysis.快速脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估在 ICU 外就诊患者的短期和长期死亡率预后准确性比较 - 系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 12;8(1):16698. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35144-6.