• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

越南结直肠癌患者新一般自我效能量表的心理测量学特性。

Psychometric properties of the New General Self-Efficacy Scale for Vietnamese persons with colorectal cancer.

作者信息

Hanh Tran Thi Hong, Thanasilp Sureeporn, Pudtong Noppamat

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Nam Dinh University of Nursing, Vietnam.

出版信息

Belitung Nurs J. 2024 Oct 14;10(5):548-553. doi: 10.33546/bnj.3544. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.33546/bnj.3544
PMID:39416347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11474266/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are currently no specific tools available to assess self-efficacy among Vietnamese individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) post-surgery. Translating and evaluating the psychometric properties of the New General Self-Efficacy Scale (NGSE) for use in the Vietnamese population could help address this gap.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Vietnamese version of the NGSE scale.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted. The sample consisted of 120 individuals aged 20-59 with CRC post-surgery, recruited through a multi-stage sampling technique from three hospitals in Vietnam. The scale was translated into Vietnamese using Brislin's technique. Content validity was assessed using the Content Validity Index for item (I-CVI) and for scale (S-CVI). Construct validity was examined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and reliability was measured using Cronbach's α coefficients.

RESULTS

The findings showed an I-CVI of 1.00 and an S-CVI of 1.00, indicating excellent content validity. The Cronbach's α for the NGSE was 0.95, indicating excellent internal consistency. CFA results showed that all eight items fit well within a unidimensional structure (χ = 48.936, >0.05, df = 24, χ/df = 2.04, RMSEA = 0.078, CFI = 0.979, TLI = 0.971, SRMR = 0.023). Factor loadings for each item ranged from 0.798 to 0.901.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the NGSE scale demonstrates good psychometric properties as applied to the Vietnamese individuals examined in this study. This instrument can be regularly utilized in clinical settings to identify key concerns in colorectal cancer patients' care and facilitate appropriate nursing interventions to enhance self-efficacy in this population effectively.

摘要

背景

目前尚无专门工具可用于评估越南结直肠癌(CRC)术后患者的自我效能感。翻译并评估新的一般自我效能量表(NGSE)在越南人群中的心理测量特性有助于填补这一空白。

目的

本研究旨在评估越南版NGSE量表的心理测量特性。

方法

进行了一项横断面研究。样本包括120名年龄在20 - 59岁之间的CRC术后患者,通过多阶段抽样技术从越南的三家医院招募。采用Brislin技术将量表翻译成越南语。使用项目内容效度指数(I-CVI)和量表内容效度指数(S-CVI)评估内容效度。通过验证性因子分析(CFA)检验结构效度,并使用Cronbach's α系数测量信度。

结果

结果显示I-CVI为1.00,S-CVI为1.00,表明内容效度极佳。NGSE的Cronbach's α为0.95,表明内部一致性极佳。CFA结果显示,所有八个项目在单维结构中拟合良好(χ = 48.936,>0.05,df = 24,χ/df = 2.04,RMSEA = 0.078,CFI = 0.979,TLI = 0.971,SRMR = 0.023)。每个项目的因子载荷范围为0.798至0.901。

结论

结果表明,NGSE量表应用于本研究中的越南个体时显示出良好的心 理测量特性。该工具可在临床环境中定期使用,以识别结直肠癌患者护理中的关键问题,并促进适当的护理干预措施,以有效提高该人群的自我效能感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e075/11474266/614afd40744e/BNJ-10-5-548-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e075/11474266/614afd40744e/BNJ-10-5-548-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e075/11474266/614afd40744e/BNJ-10-5-548-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the New General Self-Efficacy Scale for Vietnamese persons with colorectal cancer.越南结直肠癌患者新一般自我效能量表的心理测量学特性。
Belitung Nurs J. 2024 Oct 14;10(5):548-553. doi: 10.33546/bnj.3544. eCollection 2024.
2
Psychometric properties of Quality-of-Life Index for Vietnamese women with breast cancer three weeks postmastectomy.越南乳腺癌女性乳房切除术后三周生活质量指数的心理测量学特性。
Belitung Nurs J. 2021 Jun 28;7(3):235-245. doi: 10.33546/bnj.1332. eCollection 2021.
3
Translation and Validation of a Vietnamese Version of the Colorectal Cancer Subscale for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Colorectal Questionnaire.《癌症治疗功能评估-结直肠癌问卷》结直肠癌子量表越南语版本的翻译与验证
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Aug 16;10:23779608241274531. doi: 10.1177/23779608241274531. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the caregiver self-efficacy in contributing to patient self-care scale in China.中国患者自我护理贡献照顾者自我效能感量表的跨文化调适与验证。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 24;24(1):1977. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19534-2.
5
Psychometric properties of the Breast Cancer Awareness Measurement among Chinese women: a cross-sectional study.中文版女性乳腺癌认知测量量表的心理测量学特性:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 9;10(3):e035911. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035911.
6
Examining psychometric properties of the Iranian version of exclusive breastfeeding social support scale (EBFSS).考察伊朗版纯母乳喂养社会支持量表(EBFSS)的心理测量特性。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Aug 16;11(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01262-8.
7
Translation and validation of the Chinese version of Palliative Care Self-Efficacy Scale.姑息治疗自我效能量表中文版的翻译与验证
Palliat Support Care. 2024 Apr 8:1-7. doi: 10.1017/S1478951524000518.
8
Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the Problems and Needs in Palliative Care questionnaire-short version in advanced cancer patients.中文版晚期癌症患者舒缓护理问题和需求问卷简表的心理计量学评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Aug 6;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0450-5.
9
Development and Validation of a Malay Version Questionnaire to Evaluate Remote Health Monitoring of COVID-19 via Telehealth Applications: Navigating Telehealth Evolution.通过远程医疗应用评估 COVID-19 远程健康监测的马来语版本问卷的开发与验证:驾驭远程医疗的发展
Cureus. 2024 Aug 23;16(8):e67579. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67579. eCollection 2024 Aug.
10
Measurement properties of the Iranian version of the breast cancer perception scale (BCPS) according to the COSMIN checklist.根据 COSMIN 清单评估伊朗版乳腺癌感知量表 (BCPS) 的测量特性。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jun 18;24(1):743. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12493-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-efficacy-kinesiophobia correlation in postoperative patients with primary liver cancer: the chain-mediating effect of postoperative fatigue and negative emotions.原发性肝癌术后患者自我效能感与运动恐惧的相关性:术后疲劳和消极情绪的链式中介作用
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 26;16:1597999. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1597999. eCollection 2025.
2
The Italian Version of the New General Self-Efficacy Scale (NGSES): Structural Validity, Psychometric Properties, and Measurement Invariance.新版一般自我效能感量表(NGSES)的意大利语版本:结构效度、心理测量特性及测量不变性
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 14;14(6):1988. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061988.

本文引用的文献

1
A causal model of health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer patients post-surgery.结直肠癌患者手术后健康相关生活质量的因果模型。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Oct;72:102691. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102691. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
2
Relationship between self-efficacy and physical activity among colorectal cancer patients: A cross-sectional study.结直肠癌患者自我效能与身体活动的关系:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Open. 2023 Jun;10(6):3613-3621. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1608. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
3
Quality of Life and Its Influencing Factors Among Chinese Patients With Permanent Colostomy in the Early Postoperative Stage: A Longitudinal Study.
中国永久性结肠造口术后早期患者的生活质量及其影响因素:一项纵向研究
Cancer Nurs. 2022;45(1):E153-E161. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000893.
4
Medical, social, and personal factors as correlates of quality of life among older cancer patients with permanent stoma.医疗、社会和个人因素与永久性造口老年癌症患者生活质量的相关性。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Feb;38:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.11.010. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
5
Describing Self-Care Self-Efficacy: Definition, Measurement, Outcomes, and Implications.描述自我护理自我效能感:定义、测量、结果及意义。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2018 Jan;29(1):38-48. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12143. Epub 2016 May 31.
6
Affect as a mediator between self-efficacy and quality of life among Chinese cancer survivors in China.在中国癌症幸存者中,情感作为自我效能感与生活质量之间的中介因素。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2014 Jan;23(1):149-55. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12123. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
7
Psychometric properties of Chen, Gully, and Eden's "New General Self-efficacy Scale" in a Greek sample.陈、古利和伊登的“新一般自我效能量表”在希腊样本中的心理测量特性。
Psychol Rep. 2009 Aug;105(1):245-54. doi: 10.2466/PR0.105.1.245-254.
8
Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.CVI(内容效度指数)是内容效度的可接受指标吗?评估与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2007 Aug;30(4):459-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199.
9
Self-efficacy and quality of life among stoma patients in Hong Kong.香港造口患者的自我效能感与生活质量
Cancer Nurs. 2007 May-Jun;30(3):186-93. doi: 10.1097/01.NCC.0000270704.34296.86.