Strang Christianne E
Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 2;15:1484481. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1484481. eCollection 2024.
The evidence base for the effectiveness of art therapy continues to grow, even as a mechanistic understanding of how art therapy works remains limited. One promising avenue for increasing our understanding of how and why art therapy works is through the lens of neuroscience. A neuroscience-based approach to art therapy provides opportunities for improving understanding of the neural processes that underlie the complex interaction between perception, cognition, emotion and behavior that play out in the art therapy process. Understanding how therapeutic change occurs can result in improved treatment and better outcomes for clients. However, it can be tricky to connect art therapy and psychological theory directly to neural responses. The purposes of this perspective are to provide an overview of the current evidence and limits of neurobiological concepts of neuroplasticity, mirror systems, and interoception as applied to art therapy practice, and to provide updated information about outdated concepts that are still actively used in clinical practice. Critical analysis and understanding of the current scientific knowledge base can then be used to guide art therapy practice and support the development of hypothesis-based research to determine the primary mechanisms that drive the observed effects of art therapy interventions.
艺术疗法有效性的证据基础在不断扩大,即便对艺术疗法如何起作用的机制性理解仍然有限。增进我们对艺术疗法如何及为何起作用的理解的一个有前景的途径是通过神经科学的视角。基于神经科学的艺术疗法方法为增进对神经过程的理解提供了机会,这些神经过程是艺术疗法过程中感知、认知、情感和行为之间复杂相互作用的基础。理解治疗性改变如何发生可以带来更好的治疗效果和为来访者带来更好的结果。然而,将艺术疗法和心理学理论直接与神经反应联系起来可能会很棘手。本文的目的是概述神经可塑性、镜像系统和内感受等神经生物学概念应用于艺术疗法实践的当前证据和局限性,并提供有关仍在临床实践中积极使用的过时概念的最新信息。对当前科学知识库的批判性分析和理解随后可用于指导艺术疗法实践,并支持开展基于假设的研究以确定驱动艺术疗法干预所观察到的效果的主要机制。