• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Morality through the lens of Confucian heritage countries: collective self variations and moral worldviews.透过儒家传统国家视角看道德:集体自我差异与道德世界观
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 2;15:1454425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1454425. eCollection 2024.
2
WEIRD-Confucian comparisons: Ongoing cultural biases in psychology's evidence base and some recommendations for improving global representation.怪异与儒家的比较:心理学证据基础中持续存在的文化偏见以及改善全球代表性的一些建议。
Am Psychol. 2025 Feb-Mar;80(2):247-263. doi: 10.1037/amp0001298. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
3
Understanding the culture and behaviour of East Asians--a Confucian perspective.从儒家视角理解东亚人的文化与行为。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1990 Dec;24(4):510-5. doi: 10.3109/00048679009062907.
4
Engineers' Moral Responsibility: A Confucian Perspective.工程师的道德责任:儒家视角。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Feb;26(1):233-253. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00093-4. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
5
Confucian virtues and Chinese adolescent development: a conceptual review.儒家美德与中国青少年发展:概念性综述
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2013;25(4):335-44. doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2013-0031.
6
The summit of a moral pilgrimage: Confucianism on healthy ageing and social eldercare.道德之旅的高峰:儒家思想与健康老龄化和社会养老
Nurs Ethics. 2021 May;28(3):316-326. doi: 10.1177/0969733020944446. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
7
How does traditional Confucian culture influence adolescents' sexual behavior in three Asian cities?传统儒家文化如何影响三个亚洲城市青少年的性行为?
J Adolesc Health. 2012 Mar;50(3 Suppl):S12-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.002.
8
Adopting global perspectives in school psychology.采用全球视角的学校心理学。
Sch Psychol. 2024 Mar;39(2):119-121. doi: 10.1037/spq0000631.
9
Chinese culture and fertility decline.中国文化与生育率下降。
Chin J Popul Sci. 1992;4(2):95-103.
10
Qualitative Study定性研究

本文引用的文献

1
WEIRD-Confucian comparisons: Ongoing cultural biases in psychology's evidence base and some recommendations for improving global representation.怪异与儒家的比较:心理学证据基础中持续存在的文化偏见以及改善全球代表性的一些建议。
Am Psychol. 2025 Feb-Mar;80(2):247-263. doi: 10.1037/amp0001298. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
2
Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures.超越西方、受过良好教育、工业化、富裕和民主(WEIRD)人群的道德:道德的法则网络如何在不同文化中变化。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Nov;125(5):1157-1188. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000470. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
3
The neglected 95% revisited: Is American psychology becoming less American?被忽视的 95% 再探讨:美国心理学是否正在变得不那么“美国”?
Am Psychol. 2021 Jan;76(1):116-129. doi: 10.1037/amp0000622. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
4
The Psychology of Morality: A Review and Analysis of Empirical Studies Published From 1940 Through 2017.《道德心理学:对 1940 年至 2017 年发表的实证研究的综述与分析》。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2019 Sep/Oct;23(4):332-366. doi: 10.1177/1088868318811759. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
5
Culture and Family Process: Measures of Familism for Filipino and Korean American Parents.文化与家庭进程:菲律宾裔和韩裔美国家长的家族主义度量。
Fam Process. 2018 Dec;57(4):1029-1048. doi: 10.1111/famp.12322. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
6
How Moral Perceptions Influence Intergroup Tolerance: Evidence From Lebanon, Morocco, and the United States.道德观念如何影响群体间的容忍度:来自黎巴嫩、摩洛哥和美国的证据。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Mar;43(3):381-391. doi: 10.1177/0146167216686560.
7
A Systematic Review of the Relationship between Familism and Mental Health Outcomes in Latino Population.拉丁裔人群中家庭主义与心理健康结果关系的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 25;7:1632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01632. eCollection 2016.
8
Cultural Variability in the Link Between Environmental Concern and Support for Environmental Action.环境关注与支持环境行动之间的联系存在文化变异性。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Oct;27(10):1331-1339. doi: 10.1177/0956797616660078. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
9
The moral foundations hypothesis does not replicate well in Black samples.道德基础假说在黑人样本中不能很好地重复验证。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Apr;110(4):e23-30. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000056. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
10
Morality.道德
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Jan;3(1):65-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00063.x.

透过儒家传统国家视角看道德:集体自我差异与道德世界观

Morality through the lens of Confucian heritage countries: collective self variations and moral worldviews.

作者信息

Takamatsu Reina, Park Joonha, Matsuo Akiko

机构信息

Faculty of Policy Studies, Aichi Gakuin University, Nisshin, Japan.

Graduate School of Education, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 2;15:1454425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1454425. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1454425
PMID:39417031
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11479964/
Abstract

The issue of Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) samples dominating research has been ongoing for decades, and now the emerging trend is to turn to theoretical perspectives from the Majority World. Adopting Western-centric methods based on reductionism can overlook important details and differences between similar cultures, particularly in East Asian cultures, where the Confucian values of relational harmony take many forms. We discuss a novel theoretical perspective on moral constitutions in Confucian heritage cultures. Our central tenet is that divergent moral concepts and ideals are present in Confucian cultures because each culture emphasizes a specific pillar and the self is situated differently in the social relationships that define the scope of interpersonal moral obligations. We consider three Confucian countries: China, Japan, and South Korea as examples. Despite geographical proximity and conventional categorization in cultural psychology, each Confucian country manifests distinct patterns of the self, moral ideals, and behavior in socio-moral contexts. To understand how and why moral worldviews vary within a region, we need to examine how the self in socio-cultural contexts differs and guides interpersonal norms and behaviors across sociocultural contexts. We conclude this paper by offering methodological recommendations for including indigenous moral concepts outside the WEIRD context.

摘要

西方、受过教育、工业化、富裕和民主(WEIRD)样本主导研究的问题已经持续了几十年,现在的新兴趋势是转向多数世界的理论视角。采用基于还原论的以西方为中心的方法可能会忽略相似文化之间的重要细节和差异,尤其是在东亚文化中,儒家的关系和谐价值观有多种表现形式。我们讨论了儒家传统文化中道德构成的一种新的理论视角。我们的核心宗旨是,儒家文化中存在不同的道德观念和理想,因为每种文化都强调一个特定的支柱,并且自我在界定人际道德义务范围的社会关系中的定位不同。我们以三个儒家国家:中国、日本和韩国为例。尽管在文化心理学中地理位置相近且有传统分类,但每个儒家国家在社会道德背景下都表现出独特的自我模式、道德理想和行为。为了理解一个地区内道德世界观如何以及为何不同,我们需要研究社会文化背景下的自我如何不同,并指导跨社会文化背景的人际规范和行为。我们通过提供关于在WEIRD背景之外纳入本土道德观念的方法建议来结束本文。