Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC (Location VUmc), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mult Scler. 2024 Nov;30(13):1620-1629. doi: 10.1177/13524585241277044. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
Serum neurofilament light (sNfL) is a biomarker for neuro-axonal damage in multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical implementation remains limited. We investigated the impact of implementation on clinical decisions using questionnaires at the MS Center Amsterdam, a tertiary outpatient clinic.
sNfL assessments were added to routine clinical practice (August 2021-December 2022). Before and after the results, clinicians filled in questionnaires on context of testing, clinical decisions, certainty herein, expectation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, urgency, and motivation to receive the sNfL result and perceived value of sNfL.
sNfL was assessed in 166 cases (age 41 ± 12 years, 68% female, 64% disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use) for the following contexts: "DMT monitoring" (55%), "new symptoms" (18%), "differential diagnosis" (17%), and "DMT baseline" (11%). Clinical decisions changed in 19.3% of cases post-disclosure, particularly in context "new symptoms" (38%) and with higher sNfL levels (β = 0.03, = 0.04). Certainty increased ( = 0.004), while expectation of MRI activity decreased with disclosure of low sNfL levels ( = 0.01). Motivation was highest in context "differential diagnosis" ( < 0.001); perceived value and urgency were highest in context "new symptoms" ( = 0.02).
In this study, sNfL implementation had considerable impact on clinical decision-making and certainty herein. Standard implementation may complement patient care but warrants caution and more exploration in diverse clinical settings.
血清神经丝轻链(sNfL)是多发性硬化症(MS)神经轴突损伤的生物标志物。其临床应用仍然有限。我们在阿姆斯特丹 MS 中心(一家三级门诊诊所)使用问卷调查了实施 sNfL 检测对临床决策的影响。
sNfL 检测于 2021 年 8 月至 2022 年 12 月添加到常规临床实践中。在检测前后,临床医生填写了有关检测背景、临床决策、在此基础上的确定性、对磁共振成像(MRI)活动的预期、紧迫性以及接受 sNfL 结果的动机,以及对 sNfL 价值的感知的问卷。
共对 166 例患者(年龄 41 ± 12 岁,68%为女性,64%使用疾病修正治疗(DMT))进行了 sNfL 评估,用于以下情况:“DMT 监测”(55%)、“新症状”(18%)、“鉴别诊断”(17%)和“DMT 基线”(11%)。在披露后,19.3%的病例的临床决策发生了变化,特别是在“新症状”的情况下(38%),并且 sNfL 水平较高(β=0.03, = 0.04)。随着低 sNfL 水平的披露,确定性增加( = 0.004),而对 MRI 活动的预期则降低( = 0.01)。在“鉴别诊断”的情况下,动机最高( < 0.001);在“新症状”的情况下,感知价值和紧迫性最高( = 0.02)。
在这项研究中,sNfL 的实施对临床决策及其确定性产生了重大影响。标准实施可能会补充患者护理,但在不同的临床环境中需要谨慎并进一步探索。