Suppr超能文献

肠溶包衣阿司匹林颗粒与普通阿司匹林及缓冲阿司匹林的比较:两项研究报告

A comparison of enteric-coated aspirin granules with plain and buffered aspirin: a report of two studies.

作者信息

Petroski D

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 1986 Jan;81(1):26-8.

PMID:3942122
Abstract

Reported herein are two endoscopic studies performed to compare the gastrointestinal mucosal effects of encapsulated enteric-coated aspirin granules with several other well-known aspirin products. The first study compared the effects of Ascriptin A/D, Bayer, Bufferin, and 325 mg enteric-coated aspirin granules (325 mg Ecotrin capsules); the second study compared Anacin Arthritis Pain Formula, Arthritis Strength Bufferin, Ascriptin A/D, Bayer, and 500 mg enteric-coated aspirin granules (500 mg Ecotrin capsule). In both of these studies the Ecotrin capsule induced less stomach damage than did any of the other aspirin products tested. The Ecotrin capsule was also shown to cause less damage to the proximal duodenum than did Bayer.

摘要

本文报道了两项内镜研究,旨在比较肠溶包衣阿司匹林颗粒与其他几种知名阿司匹林产品对胃肠道黏膜的影响。第一项研究比较了阿西丁A/D、拜耳、百服宁和325毫克肠溶包衣阿司匹林颗粒(325毫克益普生胶囊)的效果;第二项研究比较了安纳辛关节炎止痛配方、强效百服宁、阿西丁A/D、拜耳和500毫克肠溶包衣阿司匹林颗粒(500毫克益普生胶囊)的效果。在这两项研究中,益普生胶囊对胃造成的损伤均小于所测试的其他任何一种阿司匹林产品。研究还表明,益普生胶囊对十二指肠近端造成的损伤也小于拜耳。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验